Liberalism is a Destructive Force on American Catholics

Last updated on: December 4, 2009 at 7:41 am by Henry Karlson

Liberalism is a Destructive Force on American Catholics 2009-12-04T07:41:13-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Liberalism has had a powerful, and yet destructive, influence on the average American Catholic. There is no doubt about it. Culturally, Catholics have embraced liberalism as a political doctrine, and in doing so, they have brought their politics back into the Church, causing great doctrinal confusion. If we want to repair the harm that has been done, we must be willing to look at liberalism and see how it has hurt our Catholic sensibility.

Liberalism is the creed of individualism; it is the belief that the individual should be free from external coercion, such as from the state, in order to pursue their own private interests (a classical example of this is laissez–faire economics). All individuals are seen as equal (leading to a disregard for hierarchies).

While one might point out that there is a truth involved with liberalism, it is the exaggeration of that truth which is dangerous and yet is the norm of our society. Individualism has led to a disregard to traditional forms of respect. For example, because people are equal, no one should bow before another person (if you do, you indicate some sort of subservience and therefore you present yourself as less than equal to the rightful liberal individual). This has led further to a denigration of honor, so that we have a very limited perspective in how to show it to another, and if you go beyond it, your excessiveness is seen as idolatrous (the range of honor you can show to someone else has decreased through the years, so that anyone who is said to be a follower of someone else is looked upon as a cultist giving adoration to someone who does not deserve it*).*

If we look to the criticism surrounding President Obama, we see classical liberalism making its case: when President Obama is seen as bowing to someone else, the liberal will cry out in disgust. How dare he bow? Doesn’t he know what that means, that he has lowered himself (and the reputation of the United States) because of it? How can he be seen as a leader if he acts like a servant? Yet – this is exactly the kind of activity that a Catholic should expect from our leaders. A quick look through Holy Scripture shows that the great Patriarchs were among the first to bow before others, even to those who were their own inferiors (as when Jacob bowed to Esau – the one whose birthright Jacob possessed).[1]

Perhaps the greatest criticism has been to Obama’s supporters. Here, liberal have said that his supporters were idolaters worshiping the president. What have they done to get this designation? Have they formed a religious cult around the president? No. All they have done is shown enthusiasm to the man. They know that he cannot solve all the problems of the world, and they also know they disagree with him a great deal on many issues; but they saw in him the potential to change the course of the United States, hoping it would be for the better. Their enthusiasm, their praises, does not, however, get anywhere near the level of a cult; indeed, conservatives laugh at the notion that what we see is anywhere near excessive, when we have a history of courtly honor and praise which makes what happens around the president pale in comparison (compare, for example, the courts of Constantine, Justinian, Charlemagne, Louis IX, or Louis XVI with what we see around president Obama, and we will see Obama’s followers hardly show him much honor, and indeed, they do so in rather limited circumstances).

At the heart of this liberalism is the deadly vice of pride; the ego likes to be lifted up and think itself above everyone else, and never having to give honor or respect to anyone else. While there is a limited form of respect left in our society, it is a kind of respect which is being lost, the more and more this individualism and its ways are encouraged. Road rage, for example, comes about because of the lack of respect people show towards each other while driving. But why would anyone have to show that respect, if everyone is equal and everyone should be free to do as they will? Clearly society is falling apart, and it is this liberal core which is destroying it, rotting us from the inside out. There can be no society based upon individualism, because there is no connection between the individuals themselves to make for such a society. They have become Leibniz’s monads. They believe there is no one else for them to follow than themselves; they have become slaves of their own ego and its pride.

Catholics, once again, should know better. The way to salvation is humility; the one who wants to be greatest will become the servant of all. We must die to the self, if we want to enter real, eternal life. Inordinate passions such as lust can never be satisfied, and so the libertine pursuit for pleasure (which is what they understand happiness to be) can never end. Society holds a common bond because we are not mere individuals. We are connected one with another because of our common nature.

But, as we said earlier, Catholics have been influenced by liberalism. We can see this in the way their devotions have changed over the years. In the 19th century, the word worship was never seen as a word which was meant only for God. Worship, giving someone honor, could be done according to different grades, from relative honor to absolute adoration, with only absolute adoration being given to God. Even in the early 20th century this was understood. Thus, the 1912 Catholic Encyclopedia could say, “The word worship (Saxon weorthscipe, ‘honour’; from worth, meaning ‘value’, ‘dignity’, ‘price’, and the termination, ship; Latin cultus) in its most general sense is homage paid to a person or a thing. In this sense we may speak of hero-worship, worship of the emperor, of demons, of the angels, even of relics, and especially of the Cross.”[2] But within the 20th century, Catholics slowly accepted the liberal leveling of honors, so that the only worship could be that which is given to God. Now most Catholics if asked whether or not they worship the saints will say “no.” Of course, they are right in thinking we do not give adoration to the saints, but they have ignored the great diversity possible with worship, and have readily given in to the liberal interpretation of worship as being idolatrous if it is given to someone other than God. This has, however, has influenced our spirituality. Private Catholic devotions give far less reverence to the saints, with far less practices of traditional piety (kissing icons, incensing the statues, singing hymns to the saints, etc) because these forms of reverence are inherently recognized as being worship. Indeed, liberal Catholics will be among the first to agree that many forms of Catholic piety were excessive and idolatrous (with the only given defense being the people who performed such rituals were ignorant and therefore, worthy of pity not condemnation). What was said in public about public actions and rituals gets turned in on Catholicism and their rituals.

This difficult finds itself also in the way the ordinary American Catholic treats the bishops of the Church. While the conservative knows how to give respect, and understand the limitation implicit in a position of authority, they also know that authority is to be respected and given its due place. Bishops can indeed do wrong, just like anyone else. But they are to be respected, their position given due consideration, and the response given to them should be one which demonstrates this respect, showing that their words were contemplated and not just dismissed outright. Liberals, on the other hand, are quick to dismiss authority; the only authority they cite is one which agrees with the positions they already accept, and they are unwilling to follow an authority if there is any disagreement between them and that authority. Liberals use authority for their own gains, but without any actual desire to serve that authority themselves. Of course, the liberal will point out the history of abuse within the Church and use that to indicate why authority should be dismissed. But who is convinced by such an ad homimem? Even a conservative will recognize the need for reform and constant pursuit for excellence, and if there is an abuse in authority, they will agree that it needs to be rectified, but they will not agree that it means all authority is abuse and needs to be rejected (just as the presence of alcoholics in society does not mean alcohol should be forbidden to society).

It has once been said that liberalism is a sin; while I would not go that far, it is true that the principles of liberalism lead to sin. The solution, of course, must not be some extreme counter-reaction to liberalism. The solution is not an extreme authoritarian society which gives its citizens no personal freedom. There has to be, as with all virtues, a middle way, and for Catholics, the way forward and out of this quandary is to look towards the government of God over the earth. What freedoms does God give? What restrictions does God place on society? How and why are each given? That, not political liberalism, must become the framework of Catholic dialogue in the 21st century if we want true reform in the Church.

[1] “And Jacob lifted up his eyes and looked, and behold, Esau was coming, and four hundred men with him. So he divided the children among Leah and Rachel and the two maids. And he put the maids with their children in front, then Leah with her children, and Rachel and Joseph last of all. He himself went on before them, bowing himself to the ground seven times, until he came near to his brother” (Genesis 33:1 -3).

[2] F. Cabrol. “Christian Worship,” In The Catholic Encyclopedia (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1912). Retrieved December 4, 2009 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15710a.htm .

Henry Karlson

Liberalism

Previous Post

December 3, 2009

Health Reform Bill Lowers Premiums

Next Post

December 4, 2009 The Answer to Afghanistan

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What book comes after Proverbs?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalms Ecclesiastes Isaiah Daniel