Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Preliminary Ramblings on Population and the Environment

Preliminary Ramblings on Population and the Environment

Last updated on: May 3, 2017 at 7:08 pm by Brett Salkeld

Preliminary Ramblings on Population and the Environment 2017-05-03T19:08:22-05:00 Brett Salkeld

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The past week Canada’s national newsweekly, Maclean’s, ran an article about the voluntarily childless. Later that same week, the University of Oregon produced a study on the negative impact that having children has on the environment. Conservative groups are firing back with their documentaries, Demographic Winter and Demographic Bomb. I also happened to come across Harvard historian Niall Ferguson’s interesting piece that, among other things, indicates the trouble with an aging population.

With all this circling my head, a few questions have emerged. I am not an expert on the environment, nor in demographics, and I have not worked on this long enough to make any iron-clad claims. I am, nevertheless, concerned with the presumptions behind the arguments of the would-be population limiters.

The basic claim of the Oregon study is that having a child vastly outweighs any tiny impact one’s environmentally-friendly habits (driving a hybrid, recycling, using energy-efficient bulbs and appliances) might have. I have not read the study, but the media coverage I have seen is suggesting that anyone having more than two children is being extremely selfish and causing untold harm. My first question is, “Why two?” Shouldn’t we encourage families to have one or zero?

Two seems rather arbitrary. It’s not like the third child is the one causing all the environmental damage. In fact, it seems to me that the biggest problem lies with having the first. Having Toby drastically changed my way of life. The sheer amount of things I needed made me much more sympathetic to the historical Catholic link between poverty and chastity. Having Oscar barely cost us a thing. Large families are vastly more efficient in their use of resources than smaller ones.

Now, part of the Oregon study’s conclusions are based on the environmental impact that the children of our children will have. Including this in the calculations ensures truly astronomical savings from not having a given child to start with. I am curious, though: “Why is the impact of having children who will presumably have children not simply infinite?” Where do they stop calculating? If I am to count the carbon footprint of all my potential descendants when weighing the environmental cost of having one child, surely I shouldn’t have any children.

The two-child suggestion in the media seems a mere concession to human sentimentality rather than a rational conclusion from the data. What’s more, it seems at least possible that, should this logic come to be politically in vogue, such a concession will quickly disappear. The real response to such a study is not that we should limit our families, but that we simply shouldn’t have them. (Of course, all of this presumes that humans are simply consumers and not producers. God forbid my kid grows up to be an engineer who builds public transit systems. Or an environmental scientist at the University of Oregon.)

The study notes, apparently, that it is we North Americans who are really the problem. Our children will leave roughly 7 times the carbon footprint of a child born in China. (One wonders about the child born in Sierra Leone.) So, while the rest of the world can breed with minimal impact, we need to stop. This opens up a whole new arena of questions.

I live in Canada where it is clear that we will support our economy and our social security by means of immigration. We don’t have enough babies to sustain the companies that want to sell us things, nor to pay for the retirements of the generations that came before us. We need to import the one resource that makes the economy work: people. (And we’re only taking the best and brightest, so the third world is going to have to do with a touch fewer doctors, engineers, and entrepreneurs.) But if we’re bringing in the kids born in China and Sierra Leone, don’t they start having the same environmental impact as the rest of us? Our economies demand people, whether they’re born here or not, and once they live here, they’re going to burn as much carbon as we do.

What seems entirely lacking is the recognition that the system is broken. The answer to using 7 times as many resources is to have 1/7 the children. We are told that all our recycling won’t get us anywhere near where we need to be in order to be sustainable. Surely that is true on an individual level. It is impossible for a North American to live on fewer resources than an African, but is that inevitable? Are there really no systematic changes we could make to cut down our resource consumption in a meaningful way? Are hybrids and blue bins the best we can do?

My brother is an architect. He says that we know with some certainty how to design cities so as to drastically cut down resource consumption but that it is politically impossible to do so. Developers who make more money from strip malls and suburbia than from efficient city living quickly dismantle any project that would work.

How does the average North American live? In a (relatively) huge house in suburbia with one or two children. We all have (relatively) huge yards that take literally tonnes of water and fertilizer and herbicide so that they can sit empty for at least 95% of the time. We spend hours a day burning fossil fuel in traffic because we all have cars and we all live a long way from where we work. Is this really inevitable?

I live in an apartment in downtown Toronto. I share a couple of on-site parks with the hundreds of other families that occupy student family housing. I don’t have a car. If I need one, I can rent it or join a car-sharing co-operative like zipcar. Many of the families in our building that do have a vehicle only use it when they go out of town. I share three walls, a ceiling and a floor with neighbours, so my heating and cooling costs are radically lower than those of a free-standing home. My sewage, garbage collection – yes, even my recycling – are looked after with a fraction of the resources that it would take in suburbia. I walk to school. My wife walks or takes public transit to work. My kids go to daycare in our building. I don’t have a lawn to water, but I have many potential green spaces to frequent. In short, if some suburbanite chastises me for having too many kids because of the environmental cost, he hasn’t a leg to stand on.

Nevertheless, it seems quite likely that I will one day be a suburbanite. I will have to move to where I can find work when I am done my doctorate, and chances of finding affordable housing that will hold my growing family (even if we have no more children, the lads are getting bigger) and function at the level of efficiency I currently enjoy are slim to none. This inevitability is one of those things taken for granted by the authors of the Oregon study. They presume that North Americans must continue to live the way they live now. (Of course I recognize that a scientific study that presumes no constants can never really conclude anything. Still, such a presumption could be acknowledged, even challenged, in the study’s conclusions.) It seems to them that convincing us to have fewer children is much easier than convincing us to organize our society more efficiently. I wonder if they even considered it as an alternative.

Perhaps the craziest part of it all is that, while we fight global warming, we are simultaneously trying to fight third-world poverty. And how do we do that? By exporting our economic model that has made this way of life a virtual necessity.

What we should be doing is building communities where families can live at peak efficiency, where people can walk to work and take advantage of public amenities, where the choice isn’t between a gas guzzler and a hybrid, but between transit, renting, and a car co-op.

What we’re doing instead is selling gas guzzlers and pre-packaged food and our whole throw-away lifestyle to the third world. They can have kids, for now. We need them to emigrate and pay for our retirements. But once their lifestyles have become as inefficient as ours, they’ll have to stop. We can always sell them the pill, right?

Brett Salkeld is a doctoral student in theology at Regis College in Toronto. He is a father of two (so far) and husband of one. He is the co-author of How Far Can We Go? A Catholic Guide to Sex and Dating.

Catholic Social Teaching

Previous Post

August 5, 2009

Obama, Afghanistan and the Conceit of American Power?

Next Post

August 7, 2009 I love my town...

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the correct chronological order of Paul's travels mentioned in his letters to the Corinthians?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Macedonia, Corinth, Jerusalem, Asia Jerusalem, Macedonia, Corinth, Asia Corinth, Jerusalem, Macedonia, Asia Asia, Jerusalem, Corinth, Macedonia