Nicholas of Cusa: His Example for Inter-Religious Dialogue

Last updated on: May 26, 2009 at 10:47 am by Henry Karlson

Nicholas of Cusa: His Example for Inter-Religious Dialogue 2009-05-26T10:47:31-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

While Nicholas of Cusa was known in his time as one of the great defenders of Pope Eugene IV,[1] it is clear that this is not all that he was, and it is for his other, more speculative work, that he is now considered by many as one of the greatest thinkers of all time. Although we cannot say he fits perfectly with the modern world, his works still have much to offer which could interest and inspire us today. Indeed, his was very far reaching in his ideas, and for some of them, we might not have got to a time when they can be fully appreciated.[2] His brilliance can be seen from many perspectives, such as his interest in the science and mathematics, where he was able to speculate upon the universe in a rather unique way (suggesting for example, that the earth is not the center of the universe,[3] and the universe is filled with other life forms).[4] Even more remarkable than his scientific theories, especially for his time, are his inter-religious theories; while he agreed with Pope Eugene IV (and that includes the role the Church has in salvation), he was able to look beyond the Christian faith, and to see other religious traditions as being representations of the same basic religious truth, with each religion pointing in various ways to the one truth known and possessed by Christians.[5] This is not to say each religion is of equal value or worth; he believed that the founders of world religions were inspired by God, but the human equation got in the way, and led to various imperfections which need to be purified in order for the members of those religions to see how their faith and tradition ultimately points to what is found in the Christian faith. While he could be said to be an inclusivist, this is not exactly the best way to describe him. He believed that world religions had elements of value within them which could be brought into the Church itself (he believed world religions could become the foundations for many different religious rites within the Church, allowing the people of those different rites to develop their own ways of praise and worship, as friendly rivals, each trying to outdo each other in their devotion to God).[6]

Yet, Nicholas was also a man of his times, and we must not forget that. What he experienced and saw often influenced the development of his ideas. In part because of the role of Islam in his world, he wanted to have a dialogue with Islam, one which was open and honest, able to present criticism and yet one which could appreciate what was good in the religion as well. Others around him wanted something else: they wanted a crusade. But he saw the horror of this. Nicholas had written with sorrow on the way religion is used for war. If religion is meant to inspire what is best within us, why does it also inspire some of our worst passions as well? Does it have to be that way? For Nicholas, he did not think so. Instead of fighting each other, causing even the best us to become like beasts and hurt so innocents in our rage, he wondered why we do not try to get to know those of other faiths, and actually try to find a way to work together, and see if we can overcome our diversity through charity.[7]

It is important to realize that dialogue is not necessarily irenic. There will be disputes. There will be disagreements. One shouldn’t try to paint over differences, rather, one should understand why they exist, and this will allow one to know if the difference is necessary or accidental. And this mean one must be willingness to hear the criticism of others about their faith, and the willingness to engage that criticism (and that means there might be the possibility of some change which comes as a result of the dialogue, though it depends upon many factors, including whether or not the issue at hand is definitive in the faith in question or not). By dialogue, we appreciate more what is truly important about our faith, what is peripheral, and what really doesn’t belong. We are not expected, nor should we be expected, to give up what is important; but we need to know what is important and why it is necessary for our faith. Often that is difficult when we only talk amongst ourselves, but when we dialogue with others, we really get to understand ourselves and our faith better. An unreflective faith is a dead faith (of course, different people will reflect upon it in different levels; the point is that if we don’t reflect at all on our faith it is because we don’t find our faith that important, and that, of course, is the death knoll for faith). Thus, we see that for Nicholas, he believed dialogue required him to discuss Christ and his role in salvation, and to show how those who ignore Christ end up having something deficient in their faith.

Throughout his life, Nicholas tried to figure out the best way to engage others. Does one build upon what one holds in common with the other, and show how Christian doctrines can be implicitly found in the faith of non-Christians? This he certainly tried to show in his De Pace Fidei. But what does one do when that fails? His encounter with Islam might give us some answer. His irenic De Pace Fidei was written before his Cribratio Alkorani, and the tone and approach he takes within them can, at times, be seen as the difference between night and day*.* While offering an original and thorough criticism of the Koran, he still tried to be as irenic about it as possible. He tried to give every benefit of the doubt to the Muslim faith, and indeed, he points out how many Christian interpretations of the Koran are merely polemical and false. He pointed out that Christians should give a reading of the Koran following the same rules and allowances they have for their own Scripture. Not everything need be seen as literal, as for example, the description of paradise in the Koran (here Nicholas points out that this description was clearly written for the Arab people, and the text is metaphorical, using the kind of images which were needed to attract and inspire Muslims to do that which was good). Yet, he is also quite harsh when he discusses Muhammad and one can find many of the previous Christian indictments against him. Even then, he still allows for the possibility that Muhammad had some valid religious inspiration as well. In this way, while being critical of others, even harsh as he tries to show their errors, this does not mean he went against the insight1s which inspired the De Pace Fidei. One can read his later criticism of Muhammad as a validation of the general principles established in the De Pace Fidei. Recognizing the inspiration of God in the religious faith of others should inspire Christians even more to work for their clarification, to purify their faith and to show them the fullness of truth in Christ. This can mean, as Nicholas does here, one should look at the human element in the other religions and how they pervert the truth and can be a cause of scandal.[8] We must have the spirit of charity and a willingness to learn from others, but in the same way, they need to be able to learn from us. Dialogue goes two ways, and only when it is open, and honest, allowing for the good and the bad to be discussed, can it offer any real fruit. When we discuss too much of the good or the bad, without a proper balance, then dialogue ends, and something else, something worse, takes its place (syncretism or hostility). And this perhaps is why Nicholas’ criticism of Islam ends up being one of his inferior works.

Footnotes

[1] See Nicholas of Cusa, Writings on Church and Reform. trans. Thomas M. Izbicki (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008) for a selection of his ecclesial writings which help explain why he got this title.
[2] We have yet to appreciate the revolution in mathematics, a revolution which we can see in his own works, and how it should apply to theology, although Nicholas has given us the foundation by which we can and should reorient ourselves even here. For example, his notion of God in De Li Non Aliud (on God as not other) as it unites to his ideas of the infinite should provide new ways to understand the relationship between God and creation, and perhaps change our views on what creation is and is not, and how everything in creation can be said, in relative degree, to be in the image of God (with humanity having a special way in which they represent God).
[3] De Docta Ignorantia II-11.
[4] De Docta Ignorantia II-12.
[5] He affirms this by having the Word say, “You will |all| find to be everywhere presupposed not a faith that is other but a faith that is one and the same,” Nicholas of Cusa, “De Pace Fidei,” in Nicholas of Cusa’s De Pace Fidei and Cribratio Alkorani. Trans. Jasper Hopkins (Minneapolis: Arthur J Banning Press, 1994), 38 (Chapter IV).
[6] This is proposes by having St Paul say, “Where conformity of mode cannot be had, nations are entitled to their own devotions and ceremonies, provided faith and peace be maintained. Perhaps as a result of a certain diversity of devotion will even be increased, since each nation will endeavor with zeal and diligence to make its own rite more splendid, in order that in this respect it may excel some other |nation| and thereby obtain greater merit with God and |greater| praise in the word,” ibid., 70 (Chapter XIX).
[7] This was what caused him to write De Pace Fidei; he saw the way religion has been used for conflict, but thought, because of their commonality, they could be and should be used for peace. Recently others have followed his example, such as Cardinal Arinze in his Religions for Peace.
[8] Although I think Nicholas is too harsh in his criticism; it is good that he did take the time to read a translation of the Koran, but beyond that, he still relied too much on legends about Islam, and he didn’t take the time and effort to study Islamic sources to make sure his interpretations were valid. In this way his later work reads as a continuation of the polemical tradition, but nonetheless, one can still see sparks and insights in it which differ from other Western sources on Islam.

Previous Post

May 25, 2009

Vox Nova at the Library: The Servile State

Next Post

May 27, 2009 Musical Interlude: Magnificent

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do for the ten lepers who called out to Him?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sent them away Fed them Healed them Made them rich