Man At The Crossroads: Some Further Investigations 1 of 2

Last updated on: April 22, 2009 at 6:58 am by Henry Karlson

Man At The Crossroads: Some Further Investigations 1 of 2 2009-04-22T06:58:36-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“I’ve seen things that should never be seen,

Too sick to mention, if you know what I mean.”[1]

“Liberal-capitalistic cultures inevitably give birth to ills which undermine their own values.”[2]

Anyone who turns on a television can easily find examples of the moral rot which underlies our culture. Perhaps no better example of this is “reality” television, with some of the worst of it being talk shows with guests who air our their complaints with one another to the public.[3] While there is an artificial disconnect between the audience and the panelist, so that the audience will feel “superior” to the guests, many of the shows, such as the Jerry Springer Show, encourage the audience to participate in the nonsense, demonstrating that the difference between the two is more often than not artificial.[4] Even shows, such as the Jerry Springer spin-off, the Steve Wilkos Show, where the host represents an aggregate moral synthesis of the audience giving criticism to those on stage, the panelists affect the audience and taints them as they watch. To verify this, all one needs to do is see how the audience cheers Steve Wilkos on as he crudely interacts with his guests, showing how united the two really are.[5] Connected as the audience is with the shows they watch, possibly more now than ever before, it is not surprising that societies change and undergo moral decay parallel to what is found on the shows they watch. Societies do not want to watch “reality shows” which demonstrate to them their immorality, they want to see something worse in order to feel they aren’t not really so bad after all. This means networks produce more sensationalistic shows in order to keep up with the demand. Such is as to be expected when television is produced merely to reflect the desires of the viewing audience (which, of course, is how the free market works).

But there is also more going on. These programs not only show the base elements of society, but they often work, subtly or not, to justify their behavior and to question those who would otherwise condemn their actions. The Maury Povich show is a prime example of this. One day you will find shows about cheaters being caught in the act of cheating on their loved ones, the next day you will find a show about cheaters having children needing to know who is or is not the father of a given baby (without any criticism offered to the cheaters themselves for what they have done), and then for the encore, you will have a show about gender-bending where the audience is expected to praise those who have undergone sex-changes to fulfill their sexual fantasies. As long someone goes out to fulfill their desires, one should cheer them on, so why not cheer on the adulterer as well?

On the screen we are shown that everything and everyone have a role in our society. Everyone has desires, and they should be free to fulfill their dreams. Choice is the key. If a particular moral position doesn’t seem to satisfy one’s desires, they should be free throw it out and find another. Morality in a consumerist society will be treated as any other consumer good; when it is seen as old and outdated it will be tossed out so one can make way for something new and exciting. Instead of having one’s character determined by their morals, we are shown that one should determine morality by desires. Nothing else matters. Anything else is an unjust imposition. We are told that we live in a free society, and to keep it free, we can’t have allow anything, even morality, to have any final say upon the free market of ideas. It should be the choices people make, and nothing else, which determines the outcomes of society. Such at least is the system which we have created for ourselves.

It’s quite easy to see how the defeat of communism (as it was called) has furthered this moral decay. Anyone who suggests that the government should enforce market regulations based upon moral considerations are named “socialists” and “communists,” that is, people holding to old, outdated positions which the market has already rejected. Of course, this response comes from the false belief that there are only “communist” and “capitalistic” responses to world problems. Indeed, there is a false assumption going on that if socialism is to be rejected, then we must accept the triumph of capitalism. Pope John Paul II was right in saying that this was unacceptable.[6] Thus, as he points out, capitalism, just as much as socialism, reduces the world to economics:

Another kind of response, practical in nature, is represented by the affluent society or the consumer society. It seeks to defeat Marxism on the level of pure materialism by showing how a free-market society can achieve a greater satisfaction of material human needs than Communism, while equally excluding spiritual values. In reality, while on the one hand it is true that this social model shows the failure of Marxism to contribute to a humane and better society, on the other hand, insofar as it denies an autonomous existence and value to morality, law, culture and religion, it agrees with Marxism, in the sense that it totally reduces man to the sphere of economics and the satisfaction of material needs.[7]

Unregulated capitalism dehumanizes the human person just as much as socialism. Economics, while important, should not be seen as the primary foundation by which a society is to be regulated, especially because economic interests remain abstract and impersonal. Instead, society should be guided by a higher principle, that of love. “Love for others, and in the first place love for the poor, in whom the Church sees Christ himself, is made concrete in the promotion of justice. Justice will never be fully attained unless people see in the poor person, who is asking for help in order to survive, not an annoyance or a burden, but an opportunity for showing kindness and a chance for greater enrichment.”[8] Economics should help us understand how we can manage the world, but the world suffers when economics becomes the sole means of management, and everything is read in the heuristic light of its methodologies. It should be readily apparent that a free-market system cannot be the foundation for society, because its grounding and desires is for the production of capital, not justice. Its ethics is the ethics of production; whatever produces the most and best will be the most acceptable. “Modern market societies tend to be secular, relativist, pragmatic, and materialistic. They are this by virtue of what they do, not just of what they believe. As far as these attitudes go, they do not have much of a choice.”[9] Anything which gets in the way of production, such as moral quandaries, need to be dispensed, and dispensed they are – through pragmatic and consequentialistic means. Whatever is best at production will be given a chance, and if anyone questions how production is achieved, they will be shown the outcome and be asked, “Isn’t that good enough for you?” Terry Eagleton is right in saying that agnosticism and atheism are the products of the later stages of capitalism.[10] This is because anyone who tries to limit their capitalism through morality will find themselves being beaten by those who forgo such limitations. It is not hard to see that it is nihilism, not religious belief, which allows for this. Nonetheless, this is not to say capitalists will ignore religion and religious faith; rather, it will work as a parasite, turning religion into another consumer good, to be taken in one day, junked the next when something better comes along.

Footnotes

[1] Die Happy, Talk (Speak Your Mind).
[2] Terry Eagleton, Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), 74.
[3] When talking about reality television, I mean anything which purports to show or discuss people in real world situations, and so can be anything from talk shows, court room television, or the news. Reality television is contrived. The best examples of the genre are edited in such a way as to give the illusion of “being there” with those on the screen. But what gets edited out are factors which can change the overall impression of what one has viewed. The editor controls what is broadcast, and in this way, manipulates how we see and interact with the “reality.” Often as a consequence of this, how people view things on the virtual world of the screen becomes the means by which they interact with the actual world they live in. Reality television in this way might begin as an illusion, but it certainly can end up becoming real.
[4] In many ways the audience on Jerry Springer is the show, and not the guests. Just passing by the show and stopping to watch it for a few minutes, one will notice the audience cheers on some panelists, fights with others, and some – seek to divert Jerry’s attention by flashing their body on the screen, to get Jerry’s greatest reward, a set of “Jerry beads.” The audience, and with it, the “normal” people of the world, are encouraged in this way to lower themselves to the level of the panelists, instead of encouraging the panelists to raise themselves up to a higher standard.
[5] Steve chooses something so fundamentally flawed as lie detector tests as the means by which he can level out his moral outrage to the panelist, encouraging the audience to join in with him with his dehumanizing attitude towards his guests. But one wonders how real the outrage is: if the person on the show is guilty of the charges leveled at them, one wonders why Steve would give them a platform to defend such behavior on television?
[6] Cf. John Paul II. Centesimus Annus. Vatican Translation, par 35.
[7] Ibid., par. 19.
[8] Ibid., par. 58.
[9] Terry Eagleton, Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate, 143.
[10] “The advanced capitalist system is inherently atheistic. It is godless in its actual material practices, and in the values and beliefs implicit in them, whatever some of its apologists might piously aver. As such, it is atheistic in all the wrong ways, whereas Marx and Nietzsche are atheistic in what are by and large the right kinds of ways. A society of packaged fulfillment, administered desire, managerialized politics, and consumerist economics is unlikely to cut to the kind of depth where theological questions can even be properly raised, just as it rules out political and moral questions of a certain profundity. What on each would be the point of God in such a setup, other than as ideological legitimation, spiritual nostalgia, or a means of private extrication from a valueless world?” Terry Eagleton, Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate, 39-40.

For the original series, Man At the Crossroads, click on the following:

Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV

Previous Post

April 22, 2009

On Being Cranky With No "Real" Solutions

Next Post

April 22, 2009 Vox Nova at the Movies: The End of the Affair

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal did David protect his sheep from as a young shepherd?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Horse and boar Lion and bear Wolf and fox Eagle and serpent