On Lying: A Moral Guide Based Upon Lombard’s Sentences. Part V: Definitions

Last updated on: March 9, 2009 at 5:00 am by Henry Karlson

On Lying: A Moral Guide Based Upon Lombard’s Sentences. Part V: Definitions 2009-03-09T05:00:02-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Part I

Part II
Part III
Part IV

Rather surprisingly, it is only after Lombard explains different ways in which we can lie that he actually presents us with his understanding of what it means to lie.[1] This shows us that Lombard, while he tries to be comprehensive, sometimes puts things out of the order we ourselves might. This should serve to warn the reader that he has the potential to write upon matters out of order, and even write something in one section which could impact what he wrote in an earlier one.[2]

Clearly Lombard expected the reader to have a basic notion of what it means to lie; the reason why a lie is important for his discussion is because he wants to understand what a lie does more than what a lie is (that is, he wanted to see the lie within the context of a discussion on morality, and not write a separate treatise on lies themselves). Yet, he could only go so far without actually defining the thing in itself, otherwise presumption might lead his reader to use his words equivocally when addressing the matter with others.

Augustine’s Against Lying gives us Lombard’s initial definition of the lie: “A lie, namely, is a false signification with will of deceiving.”[3] Two things immediately come out of this definition: first, for one to lie, one must intend to go against the truth (an actual will to deceive). The second is, which is an important point, is that one has to have attempted to communicate this falsehood (usually this is done through words, but it could be done by other means, such as would be the case of someone who doctored photographic evidence).[4] From this, we can say one’s opinion, even if it is in error, will not be a lie, because, when one gives it, it is said not as a presentation of absolute truth, but rather, as an interpretation of one or more facts. Nonetheless, this leave open the question, how are we to understand a deliberate misrepresentation of one’s own opinion? Lombard’s next definition of what it means to lie would lead us to say it would be a lie: “But to lie is to speak against what one feels in one’s soul, whether what one says is true or not.”[5] That is, the focus of the lie is in the deliberate attempt to willfully distort what one believes to be the case, whether or not what is being discussed is something they know about, or just an opinion they hold about it.[6] To be mistaken and tell what one believes would not be a lie, while, if one attempts to present something which they didn’t believe, even if it turns out to be correct, they would have lied, because they deliberately attempted to mislead their audience. Lombard confirms this by a quote from St. Augustine’s Enchiridion, “No one, of course, is to be condemned as a liar who says what is false, believing it to be true, because such an one does not consciously deceive, but rather is himself deceived. And, on the same principle, a man is not to be accused of lying, though he may sometimes be open to the charge of rashness, if through carelessness he takes up what is false and holds it as true; but, on the other hand, the man who says what is true, believing it to be false, is, so far as his own consciousness is concerned, a liar.”[7]

After saying this, Lombard raises a question, like he does from time to time, which challenges what he has written. This question is interesting, and deserves a study by itself, not because of what it raises about the issue of lies, but because of what it says about Christians in his day and how they treated Jews. He asks, what should one say about a Jew who, for the sake of acceptance, says Jesus is God, while they do not actually believe it? Did the Jew lie?

Obviously, the reason why a Jew would say Jesus is God is to hide the fact that they are not a Christian because they fear an interrogator who do them harm if they were to say no.[8] Anti-Semitism had made many Jews fear for their lives, and so they pretended to either be a Christian, or to convert to Christianity, to keep free from harm. Clearly, this was and is a great evil, not only because it violates religious liberty, but, even more fundamental, the violence shown to them violated their human dignity. Now, it must be said, having raised an interesting question, Lombard gives us a rather confusing answer: “What he says is not a lie, because, even though he holds otherwise in his soul, nonetheless, what he says is true, and it is not a lie; and yet he lies by saying what is true.”[9] What seems to happen here is that Lombard wants to say that what is said here is so absolutely true, because it is a significant truth about God, the source of all truth, and no correct statement about God can be said to be a lie. But the act would remain, in the act itself, lying, because it would be an attempt to misrepresent one’s own beliefs. That act, however, is not aimed against God, but oneself. For in this situation, it is not an attempt to deceive people about God, but about one’s belief in God. Thus, if one were to say this is a lie, it would be as one of the four minor kinds of lies described by Augustine (protecting someone from bodily harm or death, even if that someone is themselves). On the other hand, the one who would ask a Jew this, if their intent is to find an excuse to harm him or her, would be guilty of a far greater sin. But, we might suggest, if this is the case here, this should also be the case for many other lies; how many times do we lie just to avoid arguments over disagreement, and so tell someone we agree with them when we do not? Clearly the lie is about oneself, and not about what it is being discussed, and so should be seen as something minor, even if no lie is good.

Now, we should consider a different answer than that which Lombard gives, because, if we do, it will help us straighten out the question and the issue at hand better than what Lombard did with it. Should we not see that the Jew who says Jesus is God is doing so out of force? If that is, as it would appear to be, the case, then this would indicate why one could say the Jew would not be lying, since the answer given is given out of force, and not a deliberate attempt to deceive. The Jew is being forced to give a specific answer, and only it. They know what would happen if they did not answer the question with the words their interrogator wants to hear. This, then, allows us to look at the issue differently, without the stumbling around for an answer (like Lombard appears to be doing here). For if the Jew is expected, and being forced, to give only one answer, then the question is not a valid question, and their answer is not an answer to a legitimate question. They are being made to speak words, and so the words, and the intent behind them, are not their own. Free will is needed for a lie to be said.[10]

Footnotes

[1] Peter Lombard, Sentences. Book III, dist XXXVIII, c3.
[2] While it might be valid to take what he is going to say later and use it to help us interpret the section we are at, it is better to follow with his flow, so that one, interested in Lombard, can get a better sense of his thought processes. I think the problem we find in Lombard is he would write on an issue, and then come to see that he didn’t say everything which needed to be said, and so inserted what was needed into a place where he could make it fit, instead of going back and starting over (which, in his day, would certainly have been more agonizing than it is for us today, when we have word processors which help us to easily add to a text whenever we find the need).
[3] St. Augustine, “Against Lying,” NPNF1(3), c26.
[4] Interestingly enough, we do not see here the question of whether or not the person being lied to has the right to know the truth or not. While it does not come up here, one of the specific questions Lombard raises later would be easily answered if this were included in a definition of lying.
[5] Peter Lombard, Sentences. Book III, dist XXXVIII, c4.
[6] St Thomas Aquinas, keeping the definition to verbal statements alone, similarly says, “Now a lie is an evil in respect of its genus, since it is an action bearing an undue matter. For as words are naturally signs of intellectual acts, it is unnatural and undue for anyone to signify by words something that is not in his mind,” ST II-II, Q10, Art3.
[7] St. Augustine*, Enchiridion*, c18.
[8] One could ask whether or not the inquisitor has the right to ask the question; in all probability they do not. Perhaps Lombard is thinking of this when he gives his answer here, though, if so, he would have done well to point this out.
[9] Peter Lombard, Sentences. Book III, dist XXXVIII, c4.
[10] When one goes against force and dies a martyr, it is of course an exceptional virtue which is demonstrated, and it is grace which allows such people to become martyrs, and to overcome natural limitations. It is because they have gone beyond the norm that we can recognize the overwhelming work of God in their lives. But this does not tell us the status of those who falter, and whether or not they should be seen as guilty for that which they do under duress. We shall look more at this later, but the general understanding has been that when one acts against one’s own desires under torture, this removes the guilt involved with their action, because they no longer are in control.

Previous Post

March 8, 2009

Do You Know HOW Loved We Are?

Next Post

March 9, 2009 Obama overturns stem cell ban (UPDATED)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Boaz's kinsman-redeemer?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ruth Unnamed relative Elimelech Naomi