The Sunday of the Prodigal Son

Last updated on: February 7, 2009 at 5:00 pm by Henry Karlson

The Sunday of the Prodigal Son 2009-02-07T17:00:45-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

prodigalson Having foolishly abandoned Thy paternal glory, I squandered on vices the wealth which Thou gavest me. Wherefore, I cry unto Thee with the voice of the Prodigal: I have sinned before Thee, O compassionate Father. Receive me as one repentant, and make me as one of Thy hired servants. (Kontakion Of The Sunday of The Prodigal Son).

This Sunday, that of the Prodigal Son (or, as it is now sometimes called, the Forgiving Father), the Byzantine Calendar highlights the theme of the forgiving love of God to counter the necessary penance and self-judgment established the week before. The two go hand in hand. They tell us two sides of the same eschatological story: mercy can be attained only through judgment, but if one does not accept such judgment and repent, there is no room left for that mercy. When dealing with sin, the focus should always be on our own; when dealing with mercy, the focus should be on the universal love of God for all. Yet you cannot have one without the other, and so you cannot describe God’s love without describing how we have wounded it, and you cannot describe sin without explaining the hope of restoration which God offers to those who repent.[1]

There are three major characters within the story of the Prodigal Son: that of the father and his two sons, one who seemingly abandoned him for a life of luxury, and one which stayed with him, both with a sense of duty towards him, but also, apparently, with the hope that he will be well rewarded for that loyalty. As with the Publican and the Pharisee, most of us know examples where we have experienced the feelings of each within the context of each, although the liturgical focus, as with the moral of the story itself, is primarily upon the similarity between our lives with the prodigal son, and the similarity between God with the father. But it is because we can and do experience all three aspects of this story in our relationship with others (it doesn’t have to be a family relationship), we can understand the motivation of each, and so learn not only the lesson of the prodigal son, but also of the elder child, so as not to fall for his mistake (and we can, of course, learn a lesson from the loving father as well, so as to be like him, and rejoice when we find people coming back to us after having abandoned us in the past).

And he said, ‘There was a man who had two sons; and the younger of them said to his father, ‘Father, give me the share of property that falls to me.’ And he divided his living between them. Not many days later, the younger son gathered all he had and took his journey into a far country, and there he squandered his property in loose living.

And when he had spent everything, a great famine arose in that country, and he began to be in want. So he went and joined himself to one of the citizens of that country, who sent him into his fields to feed swine. And he would gladly have fed on the pods that the swine ate; and no one gave him anything. But when he came to himself he said, ‘How many of my father’s hired servants have bread enough and to spare, but I perish here with hunger! I will arise and go to my father, and I will say to him, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to be called your son; treat me as one of your hired servants.”‘ (Lk 15:11- 19)

All three characters of the parable are introduced, although for the most part, we are shown the prodigal son, and introduced to his attitude in life. Before his father is even dead, he asks for his legacy; in this way, one can see that the prodigal son is telling his father, “I don’t care about you. All I want is to enjoy my life, and that’s not possible as long as you are still here. If you had died, I would be having a good life. But you can help me out. Give me everything I am going to get, and I will leave; you won’t have to see me again, and I won’t have to see you again. It will be, for me, as if you had died. I promise I won’t stay around here and cause you any more grief. Indeed, it will be for you that I am the one who is dead.” The father, who loves his son, gives that which he was asked, although one can only guess the sorrow he must have for being put in such a situation.

Of course, this story is one with a meaning, and it is one with a meaning for ourselves and our own lives. We are to see ourselves in the position of the prodigal son. How, exactly, can we do this? In many ways, three of which we will pursue here. The primary, and normative interpretation, is that this story is about us personally, showing us how our sins, which come out of inordinate desire, lead us to seek pleasure in the world only for ourselves, and ourselves alone. We will contend against anyone who gets in our way, anyone who prevents us from doing that which we think will bring us happiness. This was expressed here by the son’s reaction to his father (which would be a great shock to Jesus’ listeners, where family had greater prominence in one’s life than we find today). But, following St Paul’s understanding of the relationship between Israel and the Gentiles (cf. Rom 9:1-13), we could look at it as a story of the Gentiles, and how they fell away from God in a way their elder brother, Israel, did not (or, in reverse, how the Gentiles are now with Christ, and the Jews, who should have known their messiah, abandoned him). Finally, we could look at this as the story of all humanity, and the elder brother would be God’s angels. In all three cases, it is important to see how Jesus presents the outcome such that it would be true of individual or communal sin: we might, for a time, experienced great pleasure, and feel as if our way of life has been validated, but, as we have probably already have experienced in part, that the outcome of such an egoistical approach to life can only end in our own suffering. The promises our inordinate desires give to us do not pan out. And, look at how Jesus portrayed the fall from grace that such livelihood produces: the prodigal son is treated worse than swine, which, for Jesus’ listeners, would have had a far greater shock value than it does to us, because of how Jewish purity laws led the Jews to view pigs. The prodigal son had become the lowest of the low, a slave to the needs of swine, the impurity of his way of life made manifest by this; and so we, in our sins, can see the sins themselves to be our swine, whether or not we look at this story personally or collectively. Seeing the horror of the situation and how he got there, the prodigal in his heart repents, and wants to return to his father, not as a son, but as a hired servant, feeling not worthy of any other status.

And he arose and came to his father. But while he was yet at a distance, his father saw him and had compassion, and ran and embraced him and kissed him. And the son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to be called your son.’ But the father said to his servants, ‘Bring quickly the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet; and bring the fatted calf and kill it, and let us eat and make merry; for this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found.’ And they began to make merry. (Luke 15:20 – 24).

What real joy and merriment we see here instead of the pseudo-joy we initially find when we embrace sin. Whether we examine this story primarily as the story of an individual soul as it returns to God, or that of the restoration of the Gentiles to God’s graces, or as the return of the human race to God in the Second Adam, Christ, we must see the attitude of the father in each as the what analogous to what God “feels” when we return to him. We exalted ourselves and became spiritually dead through sin; God bring us back to life, restores us to our spiritual wellbeing, when we overcome ourselves and approach him in all humility (which is the only way we can be if we feel any sorrow or grief over our sins). “For every one who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted” (Lk. 14:11). “But the consummation of grief resembles the moment when the heavenly Father runs out to meet him and embrace him. And when the son finds himself accepted with such inexpressible compassion and on account of it is filled with great joy and boldness, he receives the Father’s embrace and embraces Him in return.”[2] What Palamas shows us must not be forgotten: it is not merely the son’s humility, but love of the father for his son which allows the son to return to him, and to know true love in that embrace from his father. Once he humbled himself enough to approach his father, he was able to receive the love which his father wanted for him. Thus, the soul, the Gentile (or the Jew), and humanity, all, if they humble themselves enough to properly approach God, they will find God’s everlasting love embracing them, which will bring them into the family of God.

“Now his elder son was in the field; and as he came and drew near to the house, he heard music and dancing. And he called one of the servants and asked what this meant. And he said to him, ‘Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fatted calf, because he has received him safe and sound.’ But he was angry and refused to go in. His father came out and entreated him, but he answered his father, ‘Lo, these many years I have served you, and I never disobeyed your command; yet you never gave me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends. But when this son of yours came, who has devoured your living with harlots, you killed for him the fatted calf!’ And he said to him, ‘Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours. It was fitting to make merry and be glad, for this your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found.’ (Luke 15:25-32)

Having established the way we have abandoned God, and the loving embrace God is willing to have for us if we return to him, we are now given another lesson: the error of envy. We should rejoice with the salvation of others, of God’s embrace of them, of whatever gifts he bestows upon them, and never look at it as an affront to ourselves. Humanly speaking, it is understandable why people would feel upset if they see someone who, apparently left and did all kinds of evil things comes back to God and apparently gets rewarded by him: we feel we much has been asked of us by God, and, despite our desires, we did as God asked. Why, then, do we apparently get nothing for our loyalty? Why do we see someone else, someone who was so far away from God, get that which we feel should be ours? Indeed, they seem to have a double-reward. They did what we wanted to do, they got to enjoy themselves, and then, at their point of return, they got to enjoy God’s good graces, some which we never experienced for ourselves. It’s one thing to welcome them but, but it is another to see them rewarded while we remain – unchanged. But, if we explore this further, we should see that the problem is that here, our heart is the one which is wicked. It should rejoice in the fact that God, in his abundant bounty, has much he can share with all; we should not want it all for ourselves. Thus, we feel, if we couldn’t enjoy the luxuries of the world like the prodigal son, we should at least enjoy the graces of God in a special way. But here is the question: have we, with such an attitude, really been different from the prodigal son? Our actions might be right, but they are right for the wrong reason: it is not out of love. And in such a situation, while seemingly close to God in action, our heart is ever so distant from him. When we find this attitude in our heart, we also need to repent and return to God, just as one could say, the prodigal son’s brother needs to in this story. “To the extent that this brother, too sure of himself and his own good qualities, jealous and haughty, full of bitterness and anger, is not converted and is not reconciled with his father and brother, the banquet is not yet fully the celebration of a reunion and rediscovery.”[3]

It is envy, mixed with pride, which must be addressed and countered whenever we find these thoughts within ourselves; otherwise, such envy will fester and end up destroying our souls. “What could be more fatal than this disease? It ruins our life, perverts our nature, arouses hatred of the goods bestowed on us by God, and places us in a hostile relation toward Him. Who drove the Devil, the author of evils, to wage furious war upon mankind? Was it not envy? Because of envy, too, he was guilty even of open conflict with God.”[4] In all probability, most, if not all of us, have to deal not only with the temptation of envy, but envy itself, because, from time to time, we will be the “good son” whose heart is not yet entirely pure.

When we look at the possible interpretations we have been using to understand this parable (personal, Jew/Gentile, angels/humanity), we can see how we experience both the position of the prodigal son and of his elder brother in our lives. Looked upon the situation personally, we are at times the one who has repented and feel our brethren has not properly welcomed us back, while at other times, we see someone else who has repented and we do not welcome them back, but instead, feel some hostility towards them for all the attention they are receiving. Looking at the relationship between Jews and Gentiles, we can see how both can apply, once again, to either the Jews or the Gentiles. In one instance, the Jews would be the “elder son” who preserved their standing with God (in the covenant with Moses), and the Gentiles, having only recently come to God, appear to be the ones who have taken all the gifts from God, including the ones some Jews thought were theirs alone.[5] But, the reverse can also be seen, from the view of ecclesial history, where the Gentiles for the most part are those who remained with God through Christ in the new covenant, while the Jews, having rejected Christ, can be said to have “sold their birth right;” but the Jews, it has been said, will come back and “all Israel will be saved.”[6] Neither the Jew nor the Gentile should feel either envy or superiority to each other; rather, both should see that God’s love is open to them, and gives to each a unique character, not only for their own good, but also for the manifestation of God’s greater glory. Such envy, of course, is not just found between Jews and Gentile, but among the fallen angels for humanity. As St Basil related, it was his envy of humanity and of God which caused Satan to wage war against both. For humanity, created lower than the angels, is given a great destiny because of the incarnation; Satan, the highest of the angels, could not understand or appreciate this – and so, in a fit of envy, fell from such great heights and became the pathetic entity he is today. Let us not, in turn, envy the angels for the glories given to them, but rather, let us glorify God for what he has given to them, not only for their good, but for his own glory, less we, too, shall fall like Satan and find ourselves in a never-ending pit of despair.

Footnotes

[1] Hans Urs von Balthasar puts this well in so many texts, such as what we find here, from the fourth volume of the Theo-Drama, when he points out we must, in our judgment, be crucified with Christ in order to experience the forgiving grace of the resurrection: “The sinner’s first decisive encounter with the all-penetrating light of Christ is both things at once: a crucifying light and a liberation summons to come forth from darkness. In the sacrament of penance, which places the sinner in the spotlight of judgment, the pain of exposure to the two-edged sword of God’s word, which ‘pierces to the division of soul and spirit’ (Heb 4:12f), is the precondition for the Easter absolution. Thus, in the penitential scene with the Samaritan woman, she is both humbled and liberated. Thus Paul is blinded and cast down by the light from heaven – heretofore all was error! – but at the same time he is pointed toward a new, risen existence as a ‘chosen vessel’ (Acts 9:3ff).” Hans Urs von Balthasar, Theo-Drama IV: The Action. trans. Graham Harrison (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1994), 386.
[2] St Gregory Palamas, “To the Most Reverend Nun Xenia,” pgs. 293 – 322 in The Philokalia: The Complete Text. Volume IV. Trans. G.E.H. Palmer, Phillip Sherrard and Kallistos Ware (London: Faber and Faber, 1995), 322.
[3] Pope John Paul II, Reconciliatio et paenitentia. Vatican Translation. (Rome, 1984), 6.
[4] St. Basil, “Concerning Envy,” pg. 463 – 474 of St. Basil: Ascetical Works. trans. Sister M. Monica Wagner (NY: Fathers of the Church, Inc., 1959), 465.
[5] Gentiles should remember, however, that even if the elder son was in error to be envious of his younger brother. the older was told he was the primary heir of the father.
[6] “Lest you be wise in your own conceits, I want you to understand this mystery, brethren: a hardening has come upon part of Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles come in, and so all Israel will be saved; as it is written, ‘The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob’; ‘and this will be my covenant with them when I take away their sins‘” (Rm. 11:25-27).

Henry Karlson

Liturgical Year

Previous Post

February 7, 2009

Darfur

Next Post

February 7, 2009 Song for the Economic Crisis

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian group traces its roots to John Calvin’s teachings?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptists Presbyterians Lutherans Methodists