More On the Morality of Funding

Last updated on: February 5, 2009 at 3:13 pm by Morning's Minion

More On the Morality of Funding 2009-02-05T15:13:15-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here is the basic question: should Catholics oppose all collective funding of activities that are deemed immoral? I use the term collective funding rather than public funding to take into account things like privately-provided health insurance which is typically paid for by an implicit tax on earnings. In a previous post, a commentor argued that Catholics should oppose the provision of non-abortion contraceptive funding through either public or private insurance, on the grounds that the funded activities are intrinsically evil. I don’t intend this post to focus on contraception, but rather to use this example as a springboard toward some broader questions, such as whether such a maximalist approach is justified and why there is not a greater element of consistency.

For sure, there are certain funding decisions that we should oppose. And yes, abortion is one of them. There are others too in this category, but I’ll get to that. But for now: what about benefits provided to same-sex couples, for example? I do not see any obligation to oppose this, under certain conditions, and indeed, the church has tacitly accepted this solution since then-archbishop Levada’s agreement with the City of San Francisco in the mid-1990s. In his landmark decision, Levada declared his willingness to allow Catholic organizations pay such benefits, as long as they were not deemed same-sex benefits, and could encompass any person living at the same address as the beneficiary. Note that we are not just talking about mere tacit acceptance of public funding here– in this particular case, the Church was undoubtedly paying same-sex benefits to some people. But it was a valid compromise.

A similar argument could probably be made in relation to contraception, appealing to John Courtney Murray’s masterly reasoning. In particular, Murray argued that the coercive function of law should be restricted to narrow circumstances, and should focus exclusively on safeguarding “public peace, public morality, and justice”, addressing threats that “seriously undermine the foundations of society or gravely threaten the moral life of the community”. He argued against using coercive law to deal with issues of private morality, and be placed artificial contraceptive technology in this category. While it may have public consequences, he felt that these consequences would be difficult to control by law, and anyway, using coercive law might backfire and cause other social ills. He also appealed to the notion of religious liberty, noting in particular that it would be difficult for Catholics to oppose it when many religious leaders saw it as morally right. Even people like George Weigel seem to accept this reasoning, stressing the difference between the fifth commandment status of abortion and the sixth commandment status of contraceptive use (“conjugal morality”). For sure, there is a difference between decriminalization and active collective funding, but I think the same arguments can be employed. And if not, are not the debates over the Mexico City policy moot? For if we are to oppose all non-abortion contraceptive funding, does that not pretty much rule out most family planning services?

But there are other collective funding decisions that are far more important, even up there with abortion, and I believe these should also be opposed. American Catholics tend not to talk too loudly about these issues. I’m talking largely about the enormous military budget. In a recent post, I criticized the differing reaction to US funds going to aid agencies abroad that cooperate in abortion and US funds going to the Israel military to commit war crimes in Gaza. Outrage over one, silence (worse, even tacit approval) over the other. Now, the church does allow for a legitimate defense, but not if these funds are used (or intended to be used) in ways that are intrinsically evil, which the direct targeting of civilians.

Let me focus on a huge elephant in the room: the continued possession and funding of nuclear weapons. As noted by a triumvirate of esteemed moral theologians, all highly orthodox natural law theorists– John Finnis, Joseph Boyle and Germain Grisez — nuclear deterrence is morally unjustifiable, as it is based on the credible threat that these weapons will be used to kill innocents. If nuclear deterrence is morally unjustifiable, then public funding must also be so. There is a small wrinkle: the church (including Pope John Paul) taught that holding a nuclear deterrent could be morally justifiable only as an interim measure on a path toward disarmament. This condition has clearly not been met. Why do American Catholics not speak out more about this subject, especially since many take maximalist positions on funding immoral activities in other areas?

Let me finish with this very issue of consistency. The real problem I have is that while many Catholics take a maximalist stance on some issues (typically related to sexual morality), they take a minimalist stance on other issues of justice, including war and violence. The stereotype in the secular culture is that Catholics and other Christians are obsessed with sex, and nothing else. It’s not true: we oppose abortion because it is a life issue, not a sexual morality issue (Weigel’s distinction between fifth and sixth commandment morality). And yet, when all Catholics get excited about besides abortion is gays and condoms, well, it’s difficult to disabuse the secular culture of its preconceptions. This feeds into an issue I keep bringing up: if we are to persuade the “moderate middle” (who do not believe that abortion is a “good” and hence to be supported in unlimited quantities) of the virtues of imposing legal restrictions on abortion, that can only be done if we are consistent in our approach to life. In other words, if we give more emphasis to the really important life issues, and not so much to the secondary sexual ones.

Previous Post

February 5, 2009

A Failure of Imagination

Next Post

February 6, 2009 More Failure of Imagination

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Ebenezer" mean, as in the stone Samuel set up?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Stone of David Stone of help Stone of God Stone of Law