A Surprising Voice Against Abortion

Last updated on: January 8, 2009 at 9:03 am by Henry Karlson

A Surprising Voice Against Abortion 2009-01-08T09:03:28-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“How does one fashion a book of resistance, a book of truth in an empire of falsehood, or a book of rectitude in an empire of vicious lies? How does one do this right in front of the enemy?”

— Philip K. Dick, 1974 Interview, Only Apparently Real.

PKD – Philip K. Dick – is more than a little bit of an enigma. He was an expert at ideas, with some (above average but not exceptional) talent in writing. He found his niche with science fiction, where he could explore “what ifs” in order to deal with the two questions which haunted him the most: what is real and what does it mean to be human? His brilliant mind allowed him to fashion and refashion these questions time and again – some in not-so-straightforward (and neglected) fiction, but mostly in science fiction stories which focused on a couple key issues based upon a change he brought to reality (one he believed was at least possible, if not likely), seeing how that change affected the people involved with it. As readers of his later stories know, he was one of his own best characters, and his own sense of reality was unstable at best because of his history with drugs and his continuous religious quest which ended only with his life. He was many things at once, making for a complex, and controversial, figure: anti-Nixonite communist sympathizer, gnostic prophet, struggling author, and semi-insane paranoid lunatic. Yet, because of his insanity (however deep it went, and however reinforced it became from his drug use), he was able to see and understand things differently, and ask the right kinds of questions (even if he didn’t find the right answers), making him one of the most beloved authors of many post-modern philosophers (such as Baudrillard and Žižek). In him one could find truth to the ancient notion that the “gods” touched the lunatic, and revealed, through them, hidden mysteries which only the crazy could properly relate to. This is not to say he is an ordinary kind of lunatic – he would appear for the most part sane, and probably was; but there was that layer, deep within him, which was never stabilized and which is what led him from religious experience to religious experience, gnosis to gnosis, and to make him in reality what Timothy Leary could only dream about. And it didn’t seem to do Dick any good. Yet – for his reader, there is much to gain, even if one has to sift through what PKD left behind, and there are some gems which should be on any mandatory reading list. One of them is his short story from 1974, “The Pre-Persons.” It was as insightful as the best of his works, and, sadly, appears to be a terrifying prophecy of where the world is going unless someone steps up to the plate and stops it before it is too late.

The future in the story is bleak. The world is crowded – over-crowded (or at least, at one point, it was). In the United States, abortion laws have become quite liberalized, with the concept of person so radically changed, that it was decided that one became a full person at the age of twelve, when one can theoretically do “algebra,” showing that one was fully “ensouled.” Anyone before twelve can be “aborted”; all parents have to do is send in for an abortion truck, and the child is taken in to a center, where they have thirty days to be adopted or else put to sleep. Children under twelve have to carry on their person a “D” card, a “Desirability Card” which shows the child is desired by the parents, otherwise, if found unattended, they are seen as strays and taken in to the center – and its parents, if they want the child back, must pay a $500 fine, otherwise the child would be adopted out or put to sleep.

There are two main characters in the story, a fourteen year old kid, Walter, who is terrified about the abortion truck, even though he is beyond the age when children can be taken in (he doesn’t feel like he changed at twelve, and he had friends who had been killed), and Ed Gantro, a thirty-five year old man whose son, Tim, does not have a D card because Ed could not afford the processing fee. When Tim is to be taken in by the authorities, he challenges them by saying he doesn’t know algebra either and so he must not have a soul (perhaps he lost it). He forces the local truck driver to take him him with the children he has already collected (as if taking the children to the pound). Ed is an embarrassment to the system, while Walter is pondering what action he and his friends can take against it (he is thinking of firebombing the trucks which take in the kids). Ultimately, Walter’s father helps Ed out, and they ponder moving to Canada where the laws are different.

The story is, in many ways quite simple, and, as a literary value, it is not one of Dick’s best or most complex stories. But he didn’t write it to be such. He wrote it after he heard what happened at Roe Versus Wade, and wrote it as a “what if” piece to show why he thought the logic of abortion was flawed. And it is here where Dick shines in this story -he sees the connection between the abortion industry with modern society, and how sick the whole system has become. More than once, when we see shown what is going on in the mind of Walter or Ed, we are given glimpses to Dick’s own thoughts on the matter, and they are as relevant now (if not moreso) than whan Dick wrote the story.

“This is a con game by which the established, those who already hold all the key economic and political posts, keep the youngsters out of it – murder them if necessary.”[1] Dick, in his anti-authoritarian mode, saw a part of the problem was that abortion was an industry aimed for monetary and political gain. Its justification was a sham, based upon arbitrary notions of personhood:

The whole mistake of the pro-abortion people from the start, he said to himself was the arbitrary line they drew. An embryo is not entitled to American Constitutional rights and can be killed, legally, by a doctor. But a fetus was a “person,” with rights, at least for a while; and then the pro-abortion crowd decided that even a seven-month fetus was not “human” and could be killed, legally, by a licensed doctor. And, one day, a newborn baby – it is a vegetable; it can’t focus its eyes, it understands nothing, nor talks … the pro-abortion lobby argued in court, and won, with their contention that a newborn baby was only a fetus expelled by accident or organic processes from the womb. But, even then, where was the line to be drawn finally? When the baby smiled its first smile? When it spoke its first word or reached for its initial time for a toy it enjoyed? The legal line was relentlessly pushed back and back.[2]

One of the ironic sidelines in the story happens between Walter’s father, Ian, and mother, Cynthia. “‘Let’s have an abortion!’ Cynthia declared excitedly as she entered her house with an armload of synthogroceries. ‘Wouldn’t that be neat? Doesn’t that turn you on?‘”[3] Not only had abortion become a possibility, it became, as it were, the “in thing” to do. Ian was firmly opposed to the idea (finding his wife to be inhuman in the process):

Where did the motherly virtues go to? he asked himself. When mothers especially protected what was small and weak and defenseless?
Our competitive society, he decided. The survival of the strong. Not the fit, he thought; just those who hold the power. And are not going to surrender it to the next generation; it is the powerful and evil old against the helpless and gentle new.[4]

It should not be surprising to hear that Dick got a lot of hate mail over this story – some more than a little threatening, to be sure. But he held on to his view, and indeed, found it ironic – he was more than a little used to opposition, sometimes from the government itself:

In this I incurred the absolute hate of Joanna Russ who wrote me the nastiest letter I’ve ever received; at one point she said she usually offered to beat up people (she didn’t use the word ‘people’) who expressed opinions such as this. I admit that this story amounts to special pleading, and I am sorry to offend those who disagree with me about abortion on demand. I also got unsigned hate mail, some of it not from individuals but from organizations promoting abortion on demand. Well, I have always managed to get myself into hot water. Sorry, people. But for the pre-person’s sake, I am not sorry. I stand where I stand…[5]

On behalf of the pre-persons you might have saved, I want to say, thank you, PKD!

Footnotes

[1] Philip K. Dick, “The Pre-Persons,” pgs. 275 – 296 in The Eye of the Sibyl and Other Classic Stories (New York: Citadel Press, 1992), 290.
[2] Ibid., 291.
[3] Ibid., 285.
[4] Ibid., 289.
[5] In his notes to the story, ibid., 393.

Abortion

Henry Karlson

Literature

Previous Post

January 7, 2009

Prayers Needed for Fr. Richard John Neuhaus

Next Post

January 8, 2009 A Response to Blackadder's "Schindler's Sweatshops"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Solomon Moses Paul