Thoughts on Fiscal Stimulus

Last updated on: December 9, 2008 at 2:46 pm by Morning's Minion

Thoughts on Fiscal Stimulus 2008-12-09T14:46:08-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Should the United States and other countries on the brink of severe recession try a fiscal stimulus, or a ramping up of deficit spending by the government? Given the conventional wisdom from the 1990s– that the Clinton-Rubin-Summers pitch to lower the deficit led to lower long-term interest rates and paved the way for higher growth– it seems strange to be making such a pitch. It seems even stranger when we look at some of the misadventures from the 1970s, which saw debt in countries like Belgium, Ireland, and Italy exceed 100 percent of GDP, leading to great suffering in the aftermath. What happened to the stability mantra?

The answer is simple: we do not live in normal times. We do not have the luxury of worrying about such things at this moment. There are those, inspired by a Calvinist tradition, who see austerity as a mark of virtue, and call for the government to tighten its belt when its income falls, just like a family. But this analogy is so flawed that it gets it backwards: the great insight of John Maynard Keynes (other than his warnings– along with Pope Benedict XV– about the dangers lurking the Treaty of Versailles) was that economies can become trapped in recessions because aggregate demand is too low. If nobody buys, nobody will produce, and if production falls, employment falls– which again affects spending in a vicious cycle. In such a situation, often brought about by massive uncertainty and loss of confidence, only the government is in a position to step in.

The first line of defense is usually monetary policy: the central bank lowers short-term benchmark interest rates which determine all other interest rates in the economy. Lower interest rates encourage people and corporations to borrow afresh, and break out of the slump. The problem is that the ammunition in this monetary cannon is all but exhausted. When interest rates are close to zero, there’s not much more that can be done. Complicating the picture is that (to put it rather technically) the financial crisis is impairing the monetary transmission mechanism. What this means is that the key interest rates that determine lending and borrowing in the economy are increasingly sundered from the official rate. The reason is that banks do not want to lend to each other, or to customers. There is a lack of trust, owing to the toxic assets on their own balance sheets and uncertainty about what is on their counterparty’s balance sheets. Thus a bank will hoard cash both to guard against future losses on its own books, and because it doesn’t trust other banks. In such a situation, there is severe credit rationing, and the only borrowing comes at high interest rates. In other words, cutting official rates is limited. It gets a lot worse when interest rates approach zero, as a full-scale liquidity trap can arise: all money is simply hoarded as the return it lending it out is simply not worth the effort. In this situation, monetary policy becomes completely impotent.

In such situations, the usual retort becomes fiscal policy: the government can stimulate demand by increasing spending or cutting taxes. What matters is the size of the multiplier, or how the initial increase in demand ultimately feeds through to growth. One thing is clear: spending multiplers are larger than tax multipliers since spending has a direct a direct impact on aggregate demand, whereas a chunk of the tax cut will be saved. Beyond this, the evidence is rather murky. Evidence across various countries and times suggest that fiscal multipliers are actually very low. This could lead to the worst of all worlds, whereby the deficit mushrooms with no payoff.

Why might this be the case? The basic answer is crowding out. As the deficit expands, interest rates rise as the government issues debt to finance it, and this crowds out other lending, and thus consumption and investment. In an open economy, moreover, there will be leakage through imports, as the stimulus benefits the economies of other countries. There is also a more fundamental objection to the Keynesian hypothesis that consumption depends exclusively on current income. Economists like Milton Friedman and Franco Modigliani instead postulated that people think more longer-term, and that expected future income matters too. People like some stability and like to smooth consumption over their lifetime, and achieve this by borrowing and saving. Hence people will borrow while young, save when middle-aged, and draw down savings when old. What does this have to do with fiscal stimulus? Well, if you believe this story, it says that people will not bother spending if they think they will have to pay for today’s party tomorrow. One extreme version of this story says that if taxes are cut today, absent any change to the pattern of spending, people will just assume taxes will rise again tomorrow (not even governments can run deficits forever) making them no worse off in the long term. What do they do? They save the entire tax cut, in anticipation of being worse off tomorrow. Hence there is no effect at all from the tax cut. This case is known as Ricardian equivalence. Although nobody believes it holds in reality (the assumptions are too extreme), it is the case that people do think ahead, and pay attention to things like the long-term sustainability of the government finances.

Does all of this neutralize the case for a fiscal stimulus right now? Not all all. A good case can be made that all of these caveats are less important in today’s environment. Higher deficits are unlikely to translate into higher interest rates given the low yield on treasuries brought about by the flight to safety. In other words, since everybody wants treasuries, financing should not prove difficult. The open economy leakage can be mitigated by a broad-based stimulus across major trading partners, as is occurring in the United States, the European Union, and China. And given impaired financial markets makes smoothing consumption across time more difficult, people are more likely to base spending decisions on current income, just as Keynes said they would.

The bottom line is not at all comforting. Fiscal stimulus is one of the last weapons left to avert disaster, and yet we have no clue if it will actually work. I think it will, but we don’t actually know. The way to increase the chance of it working is to target it properly. That means spending rather than tax cuts. That means something that can get off the ground pretty quickly. I agree with many that large-scale capital spending could have a high bang-for-buck ratio. This has the added benefits of offering jobs immediately, since people must always come first, and developing infrastructure that will benefit future growth. My personal preference would be for public transportation systems, such as high-speed trains, as this would also support a further goal of reducing carbon emissions. Leading health care expert Jonthan Gruber argued recently that spending on health care reform could also serve as a fiscal stimulus. He points to technology jobs from computerized medical records and health care jobs from increased primary care provision, as well as more indirectly from allowing families to spend some of the money held in store for medical expenses. So Obama does not have to sacrifice any energy or health care goals to achieve this stimulus. Many of the goals are complements, not substitutes. The key is to be bold, and do it now.

What about tax cuts? Republicans prefer this route, usually on more ideological than economic grounds since tax multipliers are smaller than spending multipliers. If part of the package, tax cuts must be targeted to those most likely to spend the extra dollar in their pocket, and this means people towards the bottom of the income scale. In other words, it does not mean cutting taxes for the rich, or cutting capital gains tax (the latter is especially silly, given the dearth of capital gains in the current financial environment). So here too, the goal of a more even distribution of income, so important in Catholic social teaching, gels nicely with the need for stimulus.

Let’s hope and pray this works. This is more than an intellectual debate. Real people are suffering here.

Previous Post

December 9, 2008

Quote of the Week: Vladimir Solovyov

Next Post

December 10, 2008 A Moment of Grace

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the villain plotting to destroy the Jews in Esther?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sanballat Ben-Hadad Haman Tobiah