Catholic Social Teachings Are To Be Taken Together As One

Last updated on: April 22, 2017 at 8:45 pm by Henry Karlson

Catholic Social Teachings Are To Be Taken Together As One 2017-04-22T20:45:13-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When discussing Christian doctrine, Cardinal Newman made it quite clear, we cannot set different teachings of the faith against one another; rather, we must understand how they relate to each other and form from them one holistic truth. To do otherwise leads to error, and that error, if held firmly to against the pleas of the Church to reconsider, leads to heresy. “We must have a whole doctrine stated by a whole Church. The Catholic Truth in question is made up of a number of separate propositions, each of which, if maintained to the exclusion of the rest, is a heresy.”[1] This might seem strange to some people: if I hold a particular proposition to be true, and the Church teaches it, how can it be a heresy? The point is not that it is a heresy, but that it becomes a heresy if it is used to reject and ignore what the Church sees as being related to it. Thus one can believe Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary, but if you use that to say he is not God because God cannot be born, you have entered into heresy. While many who have studied theology have come across this understanding of heresy and have seen its applicability in areas such as Christology, Eschatology, or Ecclesiology, it seems to be rare for people to consider how true it is when dealing with Social Doctrine.

In the area of Catholic Social Doctrine, there is a tendency for Catholics to focus on a favored proposition (or two) while ignoring the rest. They explain political activity only under the auspices of that proposition, and thus ratify those political parties or traditions which seem to be tied to it and it alone (suggesting this is how we determine which political affiliations a “true believer” can have). Because they ignore the fullness of Catholic Social Teaching (CST), they don’t really understand the proposition they claim to hold to; to truly appreciate any specific doctrine, it must be seen in the light of the rest, and not entirely on its own. For those who know the authentic teaching of the Church, any one-sided approach ends up appearing unconvincing. Sadly, most people are not too familiar with CST, and they are capable of being led astray by ideologues who, knowing one or two elements of CST, trumpet those aspects, making it appear that their ideology as a whole is acceptable because of how it connects to those aspects of CST. In this fashion, CST is quickly turned upside down and used for the sake of partisan politics. Catholics should be careful when they hear CST used to justify adherence to one party and one party alone, because it is likely only a part of CST and not its fullness is being used to make such a suggestion.[2]

We cannot expect successful political parties, made up of people of different backgrounds and beliefs, to represent all the interests of CST. Political associations expect compromise by its affiliates. But this does not mean one has to accept the results of such compromise. Christians can never be satisfied with such a political approach to society. They must be pragmatic, to be sure, and through their prudential judgments, figure out what is possible in a given time and place, and work to make sure it happens, and this includes working with political associates who may or may not share all that a Christian looks for in society. Nonetheless, they must also work to change society by changing the hearts and minds of the people, and not just through politics.[3] Because political activity is but one means by which Christians are to engage the secular world, Christians need to consider what other means and methods they have at their disposal to bring change to society, and see if those other means might not, in the end, be more capable of producing a better society than political or legal means.

For this reason, people who focus, say, on subsidiarity alone and look at political parties in relation to how it follows their understanding of subsidiarity tend to do more harm than good to society as a whole. Subsidiarity is only one aspect of CST, and, as has been said above, when separated from the rest of CST, it can quickly lead to erroneous political and moral ideologies. Subsidiarity teaches us that social action should be taken on the lowest level of social interaction necessary to obtain a proper end. It does not, however, define what that proper end is. Taken to the exclusion of all other aspects of CST, subsidiarity would logically lead us to pure individualism. Every individual would claim their own ability to make decisions for themselves and demand the freedom to follow them out without interference from others, declaring any other level of social interaction unnecessary. We can see how the application of this, without any other teaching beside it, would allow for abortion. Subsidiarity by itself says the lowest unit of society possible, which would be the individual, should be allowed to make the decision for themselves; since there is nothing to balance this out to show why any decision cannot be made purely on the individual level, the answer then will say – the individual has the right to make that decision for themselves unhindered by society. So what if an individual kills someone else; to reflect upon the impact of a group of people (more than one individual) is to move beyond the lowest possible unit of decision, and into other categories of social thought, and would therefore be outside the dictates of pure subsidiarity. The child in the womb is also free to make decisions, but if it doesn’t decide to move out of the womb before it is killed, it is its own fault. Since there is nothing to balance out subsidiarity, the individual will always have the right to decide as they see fit; there could never be any higher authority to tell them not to act in such a way, because such an authority would suggest the individual cannot make decisions for themselves. What has been about abortion could be said about other societal ills (abortion was used as an example, because the right to life is another social doctrine, and would not need to be addressed in a society run on extreme subsidiarity). Pure libertarian political systems which desire political activity to be based upon subsidiarity alone must be rejected because, in the end, they end up being relativistic, individualistic, and provide no reason for one to be concerned about the common good.

The social doctrine which gives the greatest balance to subsidiarity is solidarity. Here, the group is emphasized over the individual, and the group is where decisions are to be made based upon objectives and standards established by that group as a whole. While subsidiarity pushes for an individualistic approach to society, solidarity pushes for collectivism. Pure solidarity, with its collectivism, ends up squashing the human person, for they will never equal the group: a person will always be a minority in comparison to the group they are affiliated with, and so they must heed to what the group decides for them rather than what they would decide if given the opportunity to do so. There is no justification one can have for overriding the group, because it is the group which reigns supreme. If the group decides someone should die, that person must die, for the group has the final say in the matter. Freedom is overridden, because the group speaks as a whole, and as a whole, there is no room for personal liberty except that which the group offers. The society based upon this ideal alone, as manifested in 20th century communism, is unbearable to live in; it is tyrannical, and the human person feels trapped and unable to do anything that would have any lasting significance or value. The person vanishes from view similar to the way a drop of water would vanish once it is put into an ocean. Moreover, just like pure subsidiarity, without any other social doctrine to balance it out, solidarity would have no means of overcoming the problems of relativism, just the relativistic morality would be established by a group instead of by an individual.

In this way, it should be clear that neither subsidiarity nor solidarity can be raised as the sole focus of Christian action in the world. The same can be said for other teachings of CST.[4] Each proposition of CST is meant to work together;[5] when united together, they present the way the Church understands the way a Christian is to live out Christ’s words, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets” (Matt. 22:37 – 40). For CST must be understood as explaining what it means to love one’s neighbor. Love is capable of bringing subsidiarity and solidarity together for the sake of the common good, instead of being separated apart and used as political talking points for the sake of partisan politics. Love is what affirms the dignity of the human person. We love them for themselves, but also we love them in our love for God. And it is love which brings people together, allowing them to be one in a qualified, non-monistic sense, even as the persons of the Trinity are united and yet distinct. “The solidarity that binds the human family, and the subsidiary levels reinforcing it from within, must however always be placed within the horizon of the mysterious life of the Triune God (cf. Jn 5:26; 6:57), in whom we perceive an ineffable love shared by equal, though nonetheless distinct, persons (cf. Summa Theologiae, I, q. 42).”[6] Since God is love, the human person, made in the image and likeness of God, is meant to manifest that love in their activity. Because of sin, the dictates of love are hard to know and follow in concrete situations; to help us, the Church provides CST as a guide so that, when we find ourselves in a difficult moral quandary, we have a way to deliberate upon what is expected of us, until that time when, purified from sin, we can live by its dictates naturally, without confusion, without deliberation.

Footnotes

[1] John Henry Cardinal Newman, An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989), 14.
[2] Obviously, it is theoretically possible that a successful party or a candidate might actually embrace the fullness of CST and to be able to bring the fullness of CST into the secular sphere, but because of the way politics works, it is in reality unlikely unless society as a whole already has come to embrace the basics of CST.
[3] Nor must they believe the way to change society is merely through the change of positive law; while it can be an effective means, positive law can only be enforced either by a society which, for the most part, already agrees to its dictates or by a tyrannical state which enforces its law through disproportionate amounts of force.
[4] Different sources present various characteristics of CST, but none of them should be seen as exhaustive. The Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church brings out four of them: the dignity of the human person, the common good, subsidiarity and solidarity (CSD 160). Sharing Catholic Social Teaching: Challenges and Directions, published by the USCCB, brings out seven different aspects of CST: Life and Dignity of the Human Person; Call to Family, Community and Participation; Rights and Responsibilities; Option for the Poor and Vulnerable; The Dignity of Work and the Rights of Workers; Solidarity; The Care for God’s Creation. No one discussion of CST should be seen as representing the fullness of the tradition; rather, each indicate concerns which the Church find it important to remind us in a given time and place, either because the issue is central to authentic Christian livelihood, or because it has been neglected and Christians need to be reminded of its importance.
[5] The problem is that, because people so often take a piecemeal approach to CST, they can back up what they say with authentic teachings, but do so with an exaggerated importance, creating a presentation of what is expected of us which, while not really false, is not really true: at best, it is a half-truth. If the person knows they are rejecting elements of CST and still try to present their explanation as representative of CST, one can even point out that what they have said is a lie. The distortion of CST is what creates the lie, but, sadly, rhetoric can be used to hide that fact – such a person often quotes many sources to show that they are speaking the truth, and suggest that anyone who rejects their teaching must therefore be rejecting an authentic truth of CST. In such a fashion, they divert the attention away from the fact that the sources need to be read in a greater context, and the interpretation being given to them is what is in question, not the sources themselves.
[6] Pope Benedict XVI. “Address To the Participants in the 14th Session of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences,” May 3, 2008. If one considers how subsidiarity and solidarity must be joined together to understand how human society reflects the communio between the persons of the Holy Trinity, one could suggest that an undue attention to one or the other will end up with an erroneous Trinitarian theology. Subsidiarity alone would end up turning the Trinity into three gods, while solidarity alone would end up creating a modalistic interpretation of the Trinity.

Catholic Social Teaching

Church Doctrine

Henry Karlson

Politics

Previous Post

October 18, 2008

Recruiters are child predators

Next Post

October 19, 2008 Escaping From Cuba

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who stopped the sun from setting during a battle?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samuel Joshua Moses Elijah