Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
The contradictions of “redneck rhetoric,” or why Palin does not represent “rural culture”

The contradictions of “redneck rhetoric,” or why Palin does not represent “rural culture”

Last updated on: September 17, 2008 at 2:29 pm by Iafrate Michael

The contradictions of “redneck rhetoric,” or why Palin does not represent “rural culture” 2008-09-17T14:29:53-05:00 Iafrate Michael

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Morning’s Minion is right to contest the rhetoric surrounding Sarah Palin’s supposed representation of “normal, white, rural” (er — “average,” whatever word you choose) america from the perspective of those who do not identify with that culture. Such talk obscures the power relationships involved in defining who is “normal” in the united states.

One thing he misses — and some of our commenters who take issue with his post have pointed this out — is that all the talk about “normal, white rural” culture, for or against, also obscures the fact that there simply is no one “white rural culture,” not matter how much as some commentators continually insist that there is. Rather than being a simple matter of drawing a line between “big city” folks and “the rest of the country” (“real people,” “rednecks”), the images of “normal america” are a social construction, as I have discussed here before. Appalachian scholars, for example, have shown how much of what passes for “redneck” culture (the images exalted on contemporary “I’m a redneck and proud of it” country radio) is actually an embrace of a completely fabricated image of the hillbilly, an image that was created with political and economic ends in view. Discourse about what is considered “normal” in rural america involves a historically-traceable process of political, economic, and cultural colonization by elites very much like the colonial processes of the Global South.

Colonization? Really? Today? Yes. Think about it: It is interesting, isn’t it, that most of the time when we hear rhetoric about “normal rural” values it is coming from media pundits, CNN reports about Obama’s “Appalachia problem,” politicians, and Catholic right-wing blogging lawyers. Who truly speaks for “normal, rural” america and of its values? Catholic bloggers? Seriously?!?! The rhetoric of Sarah Palin, the corporate media, and “proud to be an upper class redneck” Catholic bloggers is simply the latest attempt to reinscribe rural stereotypes through a process of colonization for the sake of political gain.

The “redneck” construct has been used historically for various political goals, and because of this it is fraught with contradictions. Late nineteenth and early twentieth century local color writers, sociologists, and historians described rural people as both romanticized traditional folk and lawless barbaric savages, depending on the goals they aimed to facilitate. Today, rednecks are often described as a minority who preserve a rapidly-disappearing “traditional” way of life, and who are the targets of america’s “last acceptable prejudice” (except of course, by self-described Catholic rednecks who then suddenly have an appreciation for the concept of “multiple oppressions,” being the victims of BOTH of america’s “last acceptable prejudices!”). On the other hand, when it suits them, “redneck” culture is proclaimed as being “real american culture,” the “normal” or “average” culture whose interests are finally being “represented” by politicians such as Sarah Palin. (Note, too, how Palin’s “regular redneck” supporters boast that she is “one of them,” and then object when she is actually called a redneck.)

The “redneck rhetoric’s” equation of “rural, redneck” culture and “middle-class” is also incredibly contradictory. Middle class, country radio redneck culture is not the same as “rural” culture. Appalachian scholars have shown how traditional Appalachian rural culture was colonized precisely by the forces of the american middle class for the sake of “lifting” Appalachia into mainstream american capitalist society. The result was the weakening and near-death of non-capitalist rural tradition and the commodification of a rural, hillbilly image that survives in the form of pop country music and an atrocious set of political options that supposedly represent the perspectives of “true” americans.

In reality, “rural” american values are much more complex than FOX News and Catholic bloggers make it out to be. “Redneck rhetoric” obscures the fact that incredibly important progressive social, political movements have originated in the South, in Appalachia, and in other marginalized communities in the united states. Appalachia, for example, has a tremendous radical history of labor movements which could be described as anti-capitalist. Despite the insistence that the republican party is the party of “normal redneck americans,” consider that West Virginia was, until the first (s)election of George W. Bush (in which about 50% of our country went a little bit crazy), a solidly democratic state. (For an account of Appalachia’s radical political tradition, see the collection Fighting Back in Appalachia: Traditions of Resistance and Change edited by Stephen L. Fisher.) Appalachia’s tradition of radical politics — a politics that has nothing in common with those of Gov. Palin — continues today in eco-justice movements, most visibly against the practice of mountaintop removal mining. Countless groups exist today that give expression to alternative rural american values that demolish essentialized descriptions of what “real rednecks” believe and that complexify the picture of rural america. Consider, from the Appalachian context alone:

These examples could be multiplied, of course, and I encourage readers to contribute examples from your own context in the combox. The existence of these groups prove that there is no one “normal, white, rural” culture, and that “rural folks” hardly unanimously subscribe to the McCain-Palin program. Far from it. I’m sorry, but where I come from, global imperialism is not a “rural value.” But the media, of course, prefers simple definitions of “rural,” “Southern,” “Appalachian,” “Alaskan,” “redneck,” and “traditional.” The media, of course, will not report the fact that more people turned out for an Alaska Women Reject Palin rally than for the down-home “Welcome Home Sarah” rally held on the very same day. Such realities do not jive with the master “redneck narrative” that the media seeks to preserve.

Even if the dominant image of the “normal rural american” were true and unfabricated, Republican upper middle-class “rednecks” who attempt to promote their values through the cipher of “rural america” reveal yet another contradiction embedded in their tactics: since when is it true that just because something is supposedly “normal” in the wider culture that that phenomenon should be glorified and assumed to be right? The same people who glorify their “normal rural america” construct are the same people who denounce the increasing “normalization” of homosexuality, for example, even within supposedly “traditional, rural” populations, and the same people who denounce our over sexualized american culture, insisting that this “normal” cultural trait should be resisted. Which is it? Is “normal” to be resisted, or is it to be glorified? Shall we glorify every aspect of what is called “normal, white, rural” america, including alcoholism and domestic abuse? Rather than mindlessly romanticize “normal, white, rural” culture, shouldn’t we nurture the ability to think critically about which aspects of that, or any other, culture are healthy and in keeping with the Gospel, and which are not?

And again, assuming the constructed image of the middle-class redneck is true, why should Christians be clamoring for a political candidate that represents “middle-class” america when our Catholic faith explicitly teaches us that our political candidates and our political life together should primarily represent the poor? Vatican II and subsequent Catholic social thought has taught us that we are to be a Church of the poor and that the measure of the moral health of any society is the poor. As Jon Sobrino reminds us, the poor should be at the very center of our political and ecclesial life. We are not a Church that makes an option for “middle-class normal white america,” but a Church that opts for the poor. Republican insistence that good Catholics should embrace Palin’s “normal, middle-class” values obscures the radical challenge of discipleship that the option for the poor demands of Catholics.

So in addition to thinking about non-white cultures in america that rightly represent excluded voices, one could also think about white rural voices who do not simply parrot the imposed narrative of what “rural” means. In addition to the friends Morning’s Minion listed who do not fit the “normal white” description, we could also call to mind our rural family and friends (whose who are “white” and those who are not) who, for example, may “love” their guns but who would never in a million years vote for the McCain-Palin ticket. More and more “country folk” that I know personally never ever had such hateful politics, or if they did, they’re quickly learning the contradictions and dangers of Republican ideology.

In this election, and in our national and local political life, we cannot allow colonizing forces to speak for “normal” americans, whether they are “rural” or from any other culture. Those of us from peripheral regions of the united states, regions that should obviously have a say about what “rural values” are, must not allow republican elites to define “rural america” according to their politics of fear and hate. History is not on their side, nor is the present existence of progressive counter-traditions among rural folks. We need to remind ourselves of these counter-traditions and keep them visible, talking back to those who continually tell us what our values are.

And if we keep contesting the empire’s definitions, I’m willing to bet that “rural america” surprises everyone this time around by clearly shouting that they — that we — can see through the bullshit.

America

Appalachia

Catholic Social Teaching

Previous Post

September 17, 2008

Scruton: An Attitude of Friendship

Next Post

September 18, 2008 Jay Anderson's example

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which animal did Jesus ride into Jerusalem on, fulfilling prophecy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Camel Horse Donkey Ox