Man At The Crossroads II: The Modern Crisis

Last updated on: July 15, 2008 at 8:44 am by Henry Karlson

Man At The Crossroads II: The Modern Crisis 2008-07-15T08:44:35-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Part I

Our modern, practical atheism, can be understood if we see it as the end of a long line of theological, philosophical, and social development. The debate between actual atheism and theism has, for the time being, ended in a stalemate. Society does not feel that the God question has any relevance. While people may believe in God, that belief hardly changes the way they live or act. Others don’t believe in God, but that also seems to make little difference in how they act. There are good and bad people, heroes and villains, in both camps. That has made it seem that the question of God just does not matter. Christians, of course, are partly to blame for this, because they have failed to live out the Gospel and its dictates of love. They have failed to let God live in and through them. But this is not the whole picture. Actual atheism has held significant sway on the world, and it has often taken a warlike stand against all kinds of religion, theistic or non-theistic alike (thus, communism in Russia attacked Christians while communism in China attacked the Buddhists). Militant atheism has provided a significant hermeneutical lens by which many not so militant in their atheism live out their life. It reaches down, to be sure, to the practical atheists, even if they are nominal theists. This lens, as we shall see, comes as the end product of a theological construct, found both in Protestantism and in Catholicism, which established a two-tier cosmology, separating the natural world from the supernatural, allowing a complete divorce between the two.[1] Philosophical atheism is the logical end of this construct, while practical atheism can only be seen as its typical result.

To be sure, there has always been an atheistic element in society since the beginning of time. The Psalms could not say, “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.’ They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none that does good,” (Ps. 14:1) if no one questioned the existence of God until modern times.[2] But there is something significant in modern atheism which makes it quite different in quality from all previous forms of atheism. For the Christian, the explanation is simple: it is because God has revealed himself to us as man, giving to us the ability for an absolute affirmation or absolute denial of God. “Only after God has uttered his absolute Yes to man can man utter his absolute No to God: genuine atheism is a post-Christian phenomenon.“[3] But this cannot be used to explain all kinds of atheism; not even all kinds of post-Christian atheism are actually absolute, hate-filled denials of God. Only in its most extreme form is this true.

There seems to be three major streams of thought, connected to one another to be sure, from which we can find most kinds of actual atheism emerging in individuals. The first comes from the fact that our notions of God are, ultimately, unsound. This allows for someone to come around, challenge our idea of God, and confound us when we have no answer to them. Instead of seeing how this could help us purify our ideas about God and grasp God better, many of us end up denying God once our thoughts about God are shown to be faulty.[4] This can explain why so many deists became atheists.[5] A second reason many people use to abandon God is because of the evil done in God’s name. We should all agree with them that such a corruption of religion needs purification. The sad fact, however, is that such corruption often goes unnoticed and is too ingrained to be rooted out easily. But even when this is the case, people should not give up faith in God. It’s ultimately an ad hominem. Truth is truth, whether the followers of truth do evil or not. But doubters, following this line of thought, should see it for what it is: another reason to question humanity, not God.[6] Indeed, it is ironically saying that, because people have done evil, I can’t believe in God, so I will believe in myself (despite the fact that I am also human). Finally, even when God’s followers are not actively promoting evil, that does not mean evil itself has been dealt with. The existence of evil in itself is the third, and probably most significant, challenge to the world and to any believer, as Walter Kasper points out, “From an existential point of view wickedness and evil are far more decisive for many people than are theoretical and ideological denials of God.“[7] Yet even here, a partial solution can be found (beyond the sleight of hand which reminds us that, properly speaking, evil does not exist). It goes back to the fact that our notions of God need purification. We try to create a God who is not God. We want God to be some sort of magic trick who will save the day for us whenever we desire him to do so. We don’t really want to see God as having free will and engaging us with our free will. Moreover, we don’t really want to see God as imposing himself upon us. Yet, God commands things for us for our own good. When we fail to follow his dictates, it is clear something bad will happen, not because God causes the bad, but because it is the direct result of what has been done. The law of karma, to that extent, is a universal law which no one should deny.[8] Suffering in the world, evil in the world, is the result of our failing to follow God’s guidance. It is not because God fails to follow ours.

Footnotes

[1] We shall explore this in Part III
[2] The kinds of questions put to the divinity reflect the cultural situations in which the questions come from. Greek atheism denied the Homeric gods, but often allowed for a first principle, such as “the One” of Neo-Platonism, which is why Christianity was often confused with atheism by the Romans. Yet, there is much truth in what Alexander Men would suggest, that is, atheism in any form is a symptom of a greater problem, of a spiritual crisis that had been left unattended and let to fester. “Apologists of atheism attempt to represent their ideology as the result of intellectual progress, as the most ‘modern’ of ideologies. In reality, atheism existed long before the emergence of the major world religions and has always been a symptom of spiritual crisis, impoverishment and decay,” Alexander Men. Christianity For the Twenty First Century. Ed. Elizabeth Roberts and Ann Shukman (New York: Continuum, 1996), 59.
[3] Hans Urs von Balthasar. Theo-Drama II: Dramatis Personae: Man in God. Trans. Graham Harrison (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1990), 123
[4] It is quite easy to misconstrue our concepts for God as for God himself. At best they must be seen as imperfect pointers to the truth of God. They must never be seen as statements of absolute truth in themselves; they are merely about absolute truth. While they provide a way for us to understand something about that truth, they are never going to comprehend that truth. When that is forgotten, it is easy to see how many people try to reject God, not from what God is, but from false concepts of God which they can easily refute. To refute God in this way is not to refute God, but something which is not God. It’s a rejection of an abstraction, not a concrete reality. “Every concept involves those who think and what is thought, subject and object. But God is neither of those who think nor of what is thought for he is beyond them. Otherwise he would be limited if as a thinker he stood in need of the relationship to what was thought or as an object of thought he would naturally lapse to the level of the subject thinking through a relationship. Thus there remains only the rejoinder that God can neither conceive nor be conceived but is beyond conception and being conceived. To conceive and be conceived pertain by nature to those things which are secondary to him,” St. Maximus the Confessor. Selected Writings. Trans. George C. Berthold (New York: Paulist Press, 1985), 148 (Chapters on Knowledge II-2). In this way, Paul Evdokimov reminds us that the big problem with atheism is that it must define God in order to reject him, but in doing so, it creates a God which is not God, and so they are not refuting God despite their attempts to do so. “How does atheism define the complex ‘God’ before denying him? The whole question lies here. At most it is the negation of a certain type of theology, of an anthropomorphic and human conception of God. This in no way goes beyond the human and in no way does it touch God in himself,” Paul Evdokimov. Ages of the Spiritual Life. Trans. Sister Gertrude. Revised by Michael Plekon and Alexis Vinogradov (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002), 24.
[5] “We have witnessed, during the last few centuries, ‘the rationalistic evaporation of God.’ But it was the rationalist God. A single puff will disperse the vapor. We shall not be disturbed. We shall even breathe more comfortably. The true God, the God we continue to adore, is elsewhere. He is everywhere you think to find him. He is everywhere, even when you do not find him,” Henry de Lubac. The Discovery of God. Trans. Alexander Dru (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1996), 179.
[6] “To reject God because man has corrupted the idea of God, and religion because of the abuse of it, is the effect of a sort of clear-sightedness which is yet blind. For surely the holiest things are inevitably destined to be the victims of the worst abuses. Religion, which is its own source and origin, must continue to purify itself. Moreover, under one form or another man always turns back to adoration. It is not merely his first duty but his deepest need. It is something he cannot extirpate; he can only corrupt it. God is the plow that draws him, and even those who deny him in spite of feeling that attraction, bear witness to him,” ibid., 154.
[7] Walter Kasper. The God of Jesus Christ. Trans. Matthew J. O’Connell (New York: Crossroad, 2003), 19.
[8] Of course, how one interprets that law is significant. It must be a relative, not an absolute, norm, because God is capable of transcending it.

Henry Karlson

Philosophy

Theology

Previous Post

July 14, 2008

Seeking Redemption in the Age of Oprah

Next Post

July 15, 2008 The lobbying platform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What sign did Jesus compare to Jonah's three days in the fish?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The flood The creation His miracles His resurrection