Ethno-Catholicism and the Mexican American Community (Part 1 of 3)

Last updated on: July 1, 2008 at 2:12 pm by voxnovablog

Ethno-Catholicism and the Mexican American Community (Part 1 of 3) 2008-07-01T14:12:23-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In his book, The Church in the Barrio, Robert Treviño traces the history of the relationship between the Mexican and Mexican American community and the Catholic Church in Houston from the 1910s to the 1970s. In so doing, Treviño explores the customs and traditions of the nascent Mexican community in the city and how its self-understanding as a group defined its Catholicism and its relationship with the Church hierarchy. The chief point of Treviño’s book stems from the concept of the “ethno-Catholicism” expressed by the Mexican community in Houston. He calls ethno-Catholicism “a religious style that blurred the line between the sacred and the secular and gave singular expression to the people’s identity.” [1]The thrust of his argument is that this “brand” of Catholicism, so to speak, of the Mexican American community maintained and nourished its identity in a foreign land in the midst of economic hardships and discrimination. Also, Treviño is heavily concerned with how this ethno-Catholicism was received by the Church hierarchy and how it ultimately shaped the relationship between the Church and the Mexican faithful. My concern in this essay is to use Treviño’s historical survey to explore four aspects of the ecclesial reality he describes, the first of which is the experience of the Mexican community in Houston based on their condition as migrants and how its collective understanding and identity developed overtime given its changing social and economic backdrop. Second, I will look at the Church hierarchy in Houston and how it progressively changed its attitude towards the Mexican community. Third, I will bring these two communities together—the Mexicans and the Church hierarchy—along with their parallel self-understandings, and I will make some remarks about the nature of their confluence. Finally, I will provide some closing arguments in support of a constant renewal in the Church’s ministry to different groups that have special needs.

Memory and Identity of the Mexican American Community

When we speak of the Mexican community in Houston and some of the aspects of its ethno-Catholicism, it is incumbent on us first to understand its condition as migrant. Only in this proper framework that can we gain a clearer understanding of the reasons that prompted the Mexican community to constantly preserve its identity through its religious expression, which was just one of the ways to achieve that end. The effect one’s self-understanding caused by the experience of migrating from one’s homeland to another place cannot be understated. The migrant assumes the role of an exile and a foreigner in a strange land. He departs and leaves behind all that is familiar and partly constitutes his existential circumstance. The migrant leaves behind familiar places, smells, sounds, tastes, and people that shaped his personality, which, in turn, shaped his understanding of himself. Thus, when the context changes, and what used to be familiar and bring comfort no longer exists, the migrant may find himself lost, perhaps confused by an urgent need to adapt to the new context and redefine himself within that framework. He feels the need to reform his identity and to answer the fundamental question: “Who am I now?” I believe that it is essential to understand this crisis of identity and security in order to appreciate the particular characteristics of ethno-Catholicism that arise in the Mexican community.

The ethno-Catholicism lived by Mexican immigrants and Mexican Americans in Houston was mainly characterized by a strong sense of community with tightly knit family and communal relationships that extended beyond the boundaries of their churches and parish buildings. In addition, there was no dividing line between the secular and the sacred for them. Rather, their religion flowed continuously out from the confines of the church into their daily lives; there was no real separation of religion from politics or other spheres of activity. To cause such a break, as a parishioner noted, would mean for them to “stop being who [they] are.” [2]At first glance, this aspect of ethno-Catholicism may come across as a positive element. After all, the Second Vatican Council points out that “one of the gravest errors of our time is the dichotomy between the faith which many profess and the practice of their daily lives.” [3] However, precisely because there was no differentiation between faith and other aspects of life within the Mexican community, some were led to believe that because they were leading relatively good lives they were fairly “good” Catholics. Not surprisingly, Sunday Mass attendance and the importance of sacraments, such as Confirmation, became secondary within ethno-Catholicism. [4] The strong sense of community in the Mexican and Mexican American communities was expressed in their religious festivities that served not only to raise funds for their parishes or to commemorate a popular biblical story. These occasions also facilitated the strengthening of the family and communal ties. These expressions of faith carried within themselves customs and traditions from Mexico, which constituted the memory of the Mexican community. Thus, these events served another function: they renewed their identity as Mexicans living away from their homeland. These were opportunities for the community members to remember who they were and from where they came from.

Before proceeding further, it may be important to note some socio-economic factors that the Mexican community encountered when it first settled in Houston that endured in subsequent years during its establishment in the city. Mexicans, as well as blacks, were frequently victims of hostility during the times of racial segregation. They were denied entry to public places and even many Anglo American Catholic parishes refused to allow Mexicans to enter their churches. [5] In many instances, the Church in Houston seemed to go along with this relegation of the Mexican community, which drew strong criticism from the Mexicans themselves. They were also denied good education [6] and were, as a result, immersed in poverty and destitution that ultimately forced them to take jobs in which they were exploited by their employers. [7] Discrimination made them affirm their identity even more vehemently. This constant and strong affirmation of their identity found expressions in the practices of their Catholicism in ways mentioned above.

To understand better the reasons for this response on the part of the Mexican and Mexican American community, it may be worth outlining how individuals come to some self-understanding. As T. Howland Sanks observes, “the self-understanding of a human grouping is analogous to the self-understanding of an individual.” [8] The way a Mexican immigrant in Houston understands himself, therefore, is analogous to how the Mexican Catholic community in Houston understands itself. Sanks goes further and outlines three steps by which individuals develop their self-understanding. First, we come to know and understand who we are by differentiating ourselves from others. For example, “I am a female and not a male.” This differentiation can also take place based on how others treat us. If I am an actress or celebrity of some sort, I will come to understand who I am based on the expectations and criticisms others have of my performance, career, or personal life. When we apply these principles to the Mexican and Mexican American community in Houston, the factors that affect their self-understanding as a community may start to become self-evident. I have already mentioned how Mexicans defined themselves in the negative sense, especially given their minority status within the U.S. population: “I am Mexican not a native-born American.” In many respects, their condition as migrants in the United States was the same as that of European immigrants; however, the way Mexicans were treated by whites and even by some in the Church hierarchy in Houston forced them to understand themselves as second-class citizens. This understanding, in turn, deepened their need for ethnic solidarity within their community and delayed their process of assimilation to the American society in comparison to their European counterparts.

Another way we gain a deeper understanding of ourselves is based on our family history and ethnic background—where we come from and who we are. Consequently, the Mexican community in Houston not only understood itself as being subordinated to local social and economic structures, but at the same time, it understood itself as distinctively Mexican, based on its heritage—the customs and traditions that constituted their existence as a community. It is no surprise, then, that in order to counter the sense of subordination imposed by the social structures in place, the Mexican community felt the need to reinforce and strengthen their identity by recovering the traditions that made up their memory as a community. Accordingly, we come to an understanding of ourselves based on a vision, a future goal of who we want to be. In the case of the Mexican American community, this last step did not take place until perhaps the 1960s and 1970s in the midst of the Civil Rights Movement. The Mexican community had already established itself strongly in Houston with a younger generation that was born and raised in the United States. It was during this time, Treviño argues, that the Mexican-American community reached a climax of self-definition. [9] Catalyzed by the Civil Rights Movement, the community had come to the realization that its work conditions were not humane, that their wages were unjust, and that their schools were inadequate. In addition, the Mexican community had realized the important role it played in society and the local economy, which allowed it to form a vision of itself in realizing its own potential as a body and the executing power it had to change the surrounding circumstances. It was during this “climax of self-definition” that the Church hierarchy took more decisive steps to minister and serve the needs of the Mexican community, a process that had been developing since the first years of the Mexican community’s establishment in Houston.

[1] Robert Treviño, The Church in the Barrio: Mexican American Ethno-Catholicism in Houston. (Chapel Hilll: The University of North Carolina Press, 2006) 11.

[2] Treviño 77.

[3] Gaudium et Spes, 43

[4] Treviño 59.

[5] Treviño 86.

[6] Treviño 87.

[7] Treviño 93.

[8] T. Howland Sanks, Salt, Leaven and Light: the Community Called Church (New York: Herder & Herder, 1992) 25.

[9] Treviño 176.

Previous Post

July 1, 2008

President Bush Wants War With Iran

Next Post

July 1, 2008 "The challenges we face today...are simply too big for government to solve alone."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Whose daughter did Jesus raise from the dead in Capernaum?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jairus' daughter Mary's daughter Joseph's daughter Nicodemus' daughter