Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
McCain’s record on abortion not so pristine

McCain’s record on abortion not so pristine

Last updated on: June 25, 2008 at 8:00 am by Policraticus

McCain’s record on abortion not so pristine 2008-06-25T08:00:16-05:00 Policraticus

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Gerard Bradley says he has “an unmatchable record on life issues.” Deal Hudson proclaims: “McCain IS pro-life!” Oswald Sobrino one-ups Hudson, declaring McCain “extremely” pro-life. Maybe these three men are not very informed on McCain’s record on life. Would it be charitable to borrow a term that Christopher Blosser slings at Doug Kmiec and call them suckers? Perhaps ideologues is a bit kinder and more accurate.

Before I get into this, a brief caveat is in order: I am not interested in comparing McCain’s record on life to that of Obama. They’re both dreadful, and I believe that when Catholics get into the business of trying to determine who is “better” on life they are promoting a concessional and cowardly rather than prudent and principled exercise. That said, this post, like the one I wrote on Obama, ought to be read as a freestanding critique.

We know that McCain has a checkered record on life issues, having fully supported federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. That’s an issue that the pandering Hudson once deemed non-negotiable. Truth is, Bradley, Sobrino, and Hudson (among many, many others) either deliberately marginalize the ESCR issue or they leave it out of the discussion altogether in order boast of McCain’s pro-life cred. Candor has never been the strong suit of the ideologue. When it comes to partisan politics, it appears some will overcompensate by sacrificing honesty and Catholic perspective for the good of the party, using terms like “IS” and “unmatchable” and “extremely” in order to quell any would-be objections from those of us who live in reality and think with our faith.

Really, there is no where for them to abscond when it comes to the ESCR quandry, and I have discussed this specifically at length. No candidate for office deserves to be dubbed “pro-life” when they have consistently supported ESCR at the federal level. But let’s take a closer look at McCain’s record on abortion in order to test the claims made by what Hudson calls the “Catholic Right.” Is McCain’s record on abortion impeccable from the Catholic standpoint? Are there any reasons for a Catholic to be leery of McCain on abortion? Let’s look.

In terms of legislative action, McCain has a sterling voting record on abortion to which both Republicans and Democrats can attest. Whether it was the Partial Birth Abortion Ban or freedom to access to the entrance of abortion clinics, McCain’s voting has mirrored, I believe, the ideal Catholic image of legislative participation with regard to abortion when he has decided to vote. This is all to McCain’s credit. Of course, there were those times when McCain decided not to vote on certain abortion bills, such as in 1999 when he did not vote on the Harkin Amendment to S. 1692, which intended to “To express the sense of Congress in support of the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade.” The amendment passed 51-47. Strangely enough, McCain did vote later that same day on other amendments to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2000. Omitting to vote on particular amendments to this crucial piece of legislation certainly raises some questions as to the level of McCain’s commitment to voting pro-life.

Supporters of McCain like to point out the fact that he received a 0% NARAL rating. But I’ve always found learning about someone from friends is generally more helpful and accurate than taking the word of someone’s foes. The National Right to Life Committee rates McCain as 75% (the highest rating being 100%), indicating that NRLC considers McCain’s record on abortion to be “mixed.”

How does McCain’s campaign rhetoric match up with his voting record and does it leave us as confident as his legislative actions may? It shouldn’t. McCain has not been consistent in how he speaks about abortion, and this ought to give us due pause. McCain is no longer campaigning to be a U.S. legislator; he is running for President of the United States. His ability to affect abortion in the U.S. broadens beyond his Senate record if he takes the Oval Office.

Think back to the 2000 Republican primaries. John McCain, George W. Bush, and Alan Keyes were engaged in a debate on abortion which got rather tense. Both McCain and Bush were committed to exceptions to abortion restrictions in the cases of rape, incest, and the health of the mother. While Bush did not desire to push his view into the Republican Party’s platform, McCain wanted the party’s position on abortion to soften to permit the exceptions. Keyes jumps into the debate with a rather insightful lead:

One individual who doesn’t really accept the pro-life position of the party [McCain] and another who says he accepts it, but then takes positions that are inconsistent with it so that when push comes to shave he won’t be able to defend it [Bush], and both willing to take at the personal life a position that will destroy you in debate against the Democrats.

Keyes’ familiarity with McCain’s personal position on abortion led him to declare in a February 2000 interview: “John McCain is not pro-life. Anyone who votes for John McCain betrays pro-life proponents.”

If elected to the presidency, McCain’s position on Roe v. Wade would become all the more important. The problem is, can we trust McCain? In 1999, McCain told the San Francisco Chronicle:

I’d love to see a point where it is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.

Two days later, McCain made a remark on CNN that sounded straight out of a Ted Kennedy or Barbara Boxer script:

We all know, and it’s obvious, that if we repeal Roe v. Wade tomorrow, thousands of young American women would be performing illegal and dangerous operations.

In January 2000, McCain drew fire from the American Life League. Reporters in New Hampshire, likely aware that McCain’s platform on abortion conflicted with that of the Republican Party, asked him whether or not he would permit his fifteen year-old daughter to have an abortion. His answer implicitly invoked the “right” accorded to women by Roe v. Wade:

The final decision would be made by Meghan with our advice and counsel. I would discuss this issue with Cindy and Meghan, and this would be a private decision that we would share within our family and not with anyone else. Obviously I would encourage her to bring, to know that baby would be brought up in a warm and loving family, but the final decision would be made by Meghan with our advice and counsel.

Within an hour a panicked McCain campaign issued a brief clarification:

What I intended to say is that this is a family decision. This family decision would be made by the family and not Meghan alone.

In other words, whether the decision would be made by Meghan alone or by the whole family, McCain struggled to provide a genuinely pro-life answer by actually falling back on legalized abortion. The question, which Keyes raised in a debate, is: If McCain claims the “right” to abortion for his daughter, is he not implicitly supporting the right for all women? It certainly seemed so to the American Life League.

What about the 2008 campaign? I mean, a lot can change in eight years, right? Well, after emerging as the Republican nominee from out of a rather lackluster crew of Republican candidates, McCain is getting pressure on abortion like he never has before. His commitment to exceptions for rape, incest, and the health of the mother is as strong as ever, but it appears that he may flip-flop on his official campaign position and not push for a change in the Republican platform. If he ends up choosing not to pursue a softening of the Republican stance on abortion, then he will become a political hypocrite, having slammed Bush for making that very concession in 2000.

McCain has already flip-flopped, so it seems, on Roe v. Wade. It’s really difficult to tell in which direction the “Straight Talk Express” is heading. Media Matters puts it succinctly:

As Media Matters noted, McCain said in 1999 that he “would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade,” but then issued a “clarification” several days later, reportedly saying: “I have always believed in the importance of the repeal of Roe vs. Wade, and as president, I would work toward its repeal.” In 2005, he adopted yet another position, saying that he agreed “to some degree” that Roe v. Wade should be overturned. In 2006, McCain also issued a statement indicating that if he were the governor of South Dakota, he “would have signed” a controversial bill outlawing all abortions except when the life of the woman is threatened, but that he “would also take the appropriate steps under state law — in whatever state — to ensure that the exceptions of rape, incest or life of the mother were included.

When asked by Tim Russert in 2005 whether or not agrees with Justice Antonin Scalia’s statement that Roe was incorrectly decided, this happened:

MR. RUSSERT: Now, [Supreme Court] Justice [Antonin] Scalia, as you know, believes that Roe v. Wade, which made abortion legal in this country, was incorrectly decided. Do you agree with him?

McCAIN: Yeah, I certainly do to some degree because it was based on medical knowledge and technology at the time that indicated that babies are, children are not viable at its earliest stage as they are today. So it certainly wasn’t based on sound, up-to-date medical technology. We save babies every day that are premature at a very early stage. Thank God.

So McCain says that Roe v. Wade should not be overturned in the short term, and that Roe v. Wade should be repealed, and that he agrees somewhat that Roe was incorrectly decided. However you slice it, McCain’s not consistent. Perhaps he’s trying to please all sides? Why so vague on how and when Roe is to be overturned?

Here’s McCain’s long answer in 2000:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Trbaufpok8″

Here’s McCain’s short answer in 2008 (note how eager he is to get to the next question):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQU0TF18ZfI&feature=related”

At least he’ll appoint pro-life judges, right? No way to know for certain. In 2000, McCain explicitly stated that, as president, he would have no pro-life “litmus” test for nominating Supreme Court justices. Last May, McCain promised to nominate justices in the mold of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, yet he failed to mention abortion within this context, remaining quite vague:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7bQdEiZLK4″

Not once during his 2008 campaign has McCain indicated that a goal of his presidency is to see Roe v. Wade overturned. Nor has he indicated that his Supreme Court nominations will blaze that trail. What we do have to go on is his comment that there is no pro-life “litmus” test for justices.

This deeply disconcerting problem in McCain’s campaign rhetoric is compounded by recent comments he made to Hillary Clinton supporters in Virginia this month. The event was closed to the public and media, and Will Bower, founder of PUMA and present at the meeting, revealed the possible reason why. When Bower asked McCain about judges, McCain “pointed out that he supported Bill Clinton with both Ginsburg and Breyer.”

So on Supreme Court justices, McCain goes on record stating he has no pro-life criterion for judges, yet he plans on supporting constructionists (sounds a lot like Rudy Giuliani). Off the record, he’s reminding the Clinton faithful the he “supported Bill Clinton” with pro-Roe Ginsburg and Breyer. The silence here is deafening: McCain has never once stated that he plans to nominate judges to overturn Roe v. Wade. In fact, the collective remarks he has been willing to made seem to indicate that he has no plan in this regard.

The inconsistencies, flip-flopping, pandering to Republicans and Democrats, and reluctance to speak frankly on abortion, at best, shows that no one really knows the full scope of McCain’s position on legalized abortion. While his Senate record bespeaks of a desire to restrict access to abortion, his presidential intentions are unpredictable in terms of how he would use executive power to affect abortion in the United States. Moreover, what convoluted material McCain does give us does not inculcate confidence in the Catholic voter. Only naivete could lead one to pronounce McCain a truly “pro-life” candidate.

No, dear Catholics, McCain is not “extremely pro-life.” No, dear Catholics, McCain does not have an “unmatchable record” on abortion. Rather, McCain has a very ambiguous, opaque, turbid, and inconsistent platform on abortion. McCain is not our pro-life candidate. But I suppose as long as he’s got Bradley, Sobrino, and Hudson in his corner making the case that he is, there’s going to be at least some duped Catholics. Just try not to be one of them.

Abortion

Election

Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Policraticus

Politics

Pro-Life

Previous Post

June 25, 2008

Culture as Popular Culture

Next Post

June 25, 2008 Voting and Nolo Contendere

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where did David spare Saul's life when he found him in a cave?

Select your answer to see how you score.

En Gedi Hebron Bethlehem Gilgal