Weigel and Islam

Last updated on: February 28, 2008 at 5:23 pm by Morning's Minion

Weigel and Islam 2008-02-28T17:23:27-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

William Cavanaugh has a review of George Weigel’s Faith, Reason, and the War Against Jihadism. From simply reading Cavanaugh’s review, Weigel’s treatise on Islam and “jihadism” seems shockingly ignorant. It is little more than a justification for the “war on terror” promoted by the Bush administration and cheered on by a coterie of fellow-travelers, whereby all Muslims with a beef against the United States are lumped into one big nasty group of “jihadists”, regardless of context. Weigel’s chief ontribution is basically to say that it all stems from faulty theology. The problem, as pointed out by Cavanaugh, is that “privileging theological ideas as the cause behind jihadism seems to license Weigel to ignore material history”. For Weigel, it is all about the defects within Islam itself that leads to this irrevocable conflict with the west. The implication is pellucid: this enemy must be beaten at all costs.

Weigel is following the example of many associated with the Bush administration (and wannabes like Mitt Romney) who try to lump together every Muslim with a gripe against the United States and the west into a broad nefarious conspiracy intent on restoring the caliphate and destroying modern civilization in the process. He seems to forget that the true believers here number no more than a few thousand, and most of them are holed up in caves in inhospitable mountainous regions, lacking state support. Of course, Weigel’s vision of jihadism encompasses a diverse group of Sunni and Shia Muslims, from Hamas to Hezbollah to Baathists to the Muslim Brotherhood. But to make this story work, to use the words of Daniel Larison, “these diverse and disparate groups must be brought together under a single, frightening label and they must be made out to be enemies of America, whether or not these descriptions are plausible, true or reasonable.” When Romney tried to gain traction by pumping up the “worldwide jihadist effort” he was roundly mocked by citizens of the reality-based community. As Spencer Ackerman noted “there is no caliphate on heaven or earth that will simultaneously satisfy Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, which goes a long way toward explaining why there is no concerted worldwide jihadist effort by these groups to establish one”. But that doesn’t stop George.

What Weigel misses is nuance. What he essentially tries to do is put a theological gloss on the faux-machismo of the Mitt Romneys of the world. As Cavanaugh demonstrates, Weigel simply refuses to accept that Muslims might have legitimate beefs with the west. For Weigel, economic factors are not relevant, colonialism and imperialism represented “a great flanking movement in response to Islamic advances into the continent of Europe ” (leading Cavanaugh to conclude that he even blames European colonialism on the Muslims), and the west is guilty of no evil. Weigel has a lot of say about the Iranian revolution of 1979, but is silent on the western overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953 (prompted by oil interests) and the subsequent support for the murderous regime of Reza Pahlavi. The US lop-sided support for Israel has nothing to do with it, neither does its penchant for talking about democracy while simultaneously backing despots and cracking down on outbreaks of democracy that have the audacity to elect Islamists. Nothing to do with invasions, occupations, and torture either. No, it’s all because they love death and are indeed (I’m not making this up) the “party of death”. In Cavanaugh’s words:

“They do not hate us because of the coup in 1953; or because we used to support Saddam and the Shah; or because we currently support repressive regimes in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Indonesia; or because UNESCO said that our sanctions against Saddam’s Iraq were causing a half-million children to die each year and Madeline Albright said it was “worth it” (she later called that “a mistake”); or because our military occupies two Muslim countries; or because we give carte blanche to Israeli occupation and settlement of Palestinian territory; or because of Abu Ghraib or Halliburton or Guantánamo Bay or “extraordinary rendition.” No. They hate us because they hate life. Such self-serving hogwash ironically reproduces the worldview of jihadism: the binary division of the world into good and evil, the dehumanization of the enemy, and the inability to engage in self-criticism.”

The problem is, there are important theological points that must come to the fore in any debate between Christians and Muslims. Here, Weigel thinks he is directly following Pope Benedict. But he isn’t. The pope raised the issue, very subtly, of the link between voluntarism and Islam. Catholics believe that God is reasonable, and even though the mind of God is vastly beyond our comprehension, the way we think is close enough to the way that God thinks to allow us to claim that God is an infinite and eternal intellect. Voluntarists, on the other hand, believe that God should be conceived as pure will, not pure reason and intellect, on the grounds that God transcends all human ways of thinking about Him. The pope was trying to point out some problems with voluntarism, noting that it might “lead to the image of a capricious God, who is not even bound to truth and goodness.” This is an important theological debate, and it is important to note that there have been strains of voluntarism in Christianity just as there have Muslims who worship a God of reason. We should not forget the debt that Thomas Aquinas owes to prominent Muslim intellectuals such as Averroes and Avicenna. This is a debate we need to have, as it relates to the crucial point of compulsion in religion, and there is evidence that Islamic scholars are ready for this debate. But we need to move away from the cartoon creations of George Weigel.

As noted by Rita Ferrone, a group of 138 Muslims scholars penned an unprecedented open letter last year, entitled A Common Word between Us and You, calling for earnest dialogue with Christianity. The signatories hail from forty-two countries, and represent “a wide diversity of Islamic thought, practice, spirituality, and schools of jurisprudence.” This truly historic. And yet, despite being welcomed by the Vatican, Weigel has publicly attacked the initiative, even voicing suspicions about some of the signatories.

Ironically, while Weigel hones in on what he sees as the flawed theology of Islam, he is embracing some really bad theology himself, veering in the direction of Calvinism. I’ve talked about this many times, as it pertains to foreign policy. Basically, this manifests as an inherent dualism, whereby the world is seen as divided between the good guys and the bad guys, the saved and the damned, the virtuous and the undeserving. There is no role for grace and redempti0n, no conception of “there but for the grace of God go I”. Instead of a theology based on the unity of the human race, where dis-unity results from sin, we have a theology that widens division. There is an obsessive need to vindicated as virtuous, as otherwise the guaranteed salvation might be in jeopardy. And how else you do validate your status as one of the elect if not by scapegoating others? That is why Weigel needs to blame the Muslims for all of their problems, and let the west completely off the hook. This is atrocious theology, and not very Catholic. Plus, as Cavanaugh points out, this level of caricatured certainty is being propounded by a man who opposed the Church on the Iraq war (same theology) and turned out to be disastrously wrong. The fact that he can so blandly use a term associated with the evangelical right in the US such as “party of death” is telling.

So while Weigel claims the Vatican mantle in the debate with Islam, his theology is very different. Think of a key example. The essence of Pope Benedict’s thought is that the Enlightenment, to the extent that it ignores the law of God, can lead to moral dead ends. As Catholics therefore, we need to tread carefully in addressing modernity, taking what is good, discarding what is bad, but always remaining open to reason. But I do not see that nuance with Weigel. For him, the problem with Islam is simply that it cannot address modernity, or science, or democracy, or freedom; and where God is seen as “distant and cold-an absolute power whose requirement of obedience rules out pluralism or any division between sacred and secular”. As with the evangelical right in the United States, we have a fusion between a Calvinist foreign policy and the liberal values that emanate from the Enlightenment. In the final analysis, Weigel is closer to Christopher Hitchens than Pope Benedict.

Previous Post

February 28, 2008

Vatican Emissary Condemns Cuban Embargo

Next Post

February 28, 2008 Myth of Free Trade

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul say is the greatest of faith, hope, and love?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hope Faith Love Strength