Lack of Commitment: The Fundamental Myth Behind Cohabitation

Last updated on: January 4, 2008 at 3:54 pm by voxnovablog

Lack of Commitment: The Fundamental Myth Behind Cohabitation 2008-01-04T15:54:08-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Recently, I was talking to one of my friends about men, relationships and marriage. She is currently single and is actively looking so she suddenly told me that she perhaps did not want to get married, because “marriage is just a paper” and it is such a long “commitment.” She may consider “living together” as an option instead in case that she finds the right person.

My friend is neither Catholic nor Christian but I still see the same thought process taking place with regard to marriage in believers and non-believers alike. The high rate of divorce in this country takes place in marriages inside and outside the Church alike. I’m not really sure how the number of Catholic couples who choose to live together before marriage compares to the number of non-Catholics or non-Christians. I can say, nonetheless, that I have sadly seen how Catholic acquaintances, friends, and the young people I worked with in my parish have gone down the route of living together and “skipping marriage for a while” or altogether.

In my own experience, the common response to justify cohabitation instead of getting married beforehand is the same one that my friend gave me: no “permanent” ties to the other person. In other words, living together is more convenient because there is no “permanent commitment” attaching a person to the other. So, what does that mean? That by living together either one of the parties can just walk out whenever they don’t like something or don’t feel like arguing? Is that the sole benefit of cohabitation? No “paper” tying down the two together? I’m asking, because I honestly do not understand it.

I cannot explain my friend what marriage means as a Sacrament and why it is necessary, because as I have said she is not a Christian. I do not pretend to talk about the many social factors that make a person choose cohabitation over marriage, because this post will soon prove itself too short. I do not pretend here either to discuss the differences about how the institution of marriage is seen by the State and the Catholic Church. I have chosen instead to approach marriage by simply talking about commitment in terms of why it is necessary in our lives as human beings.

Our actions and relationships are all either based or safeguarded through commitments or contracts that are either nonverbal or exist in some kind of written form. Commitment, therefore, means stability. Think of learning, for instance. Learning is a process that is achieved successfully through practice, constancy and perseverance. Thus, children, teenagers, young adults and even adults are expected to commit to go to school or respective classes every day and discouraged from missing a certain number of days. If the student misses too many classes, the teaching and learning process ceases to be effective and results in a waste of time and resources for the teachers and even other students.

Another practical example: work. Most individuals strive for a full-time job instead of having one or several part-time jobs with hourly wages that do not represent a stable income. Full-time jobs are of a more permanent character than part-time positions and they may offer many benefits while part-time jobs do not. However, regardless of whether we are talking about a full-time or part-time position, any kind of work we perform has its requirements and it is governed by a contract (a paper!) that we sign. When we sign our contract, we are committed to our employer to come to work every day, to show up on time and to perform our duties effectively. The worker who does not fulfill his or her commitment affects the whole working environment: the tasks are delayed or unfinished, other coworkers have to wait for information, and so forth.

I can think of numerous examples in our daily lives that are governed by a “contract” (paper) or, in other words, by a commitment from all the parties involved: credit purchases, loans, leases, insurance policies, and many more. In the previous examples, one can talk about “rights” and “duties.” There are very few instances in our lives in which we do not have any duties towards someone or something: our employer, teachers, friends, family, etc. We have to pay bills, go to work, go to school, attend family functions, etc. These are requirements for our tasks and relationships to be fruitful. But because we fulfill these duties, we have a right to enjoy our house or apartment, to spend our hard-earned salary as we deem appropriate, or to enjoy the company of friends and family. We all know how much it bothers us when friends or family members do not return our calls and we don’t hear from them for a while but only when they need something from us: “They are just not seriously committed to us,” we think.

Can you think of tasks we perform or relationships we have in which we do not have any duties whatsoever, but we just do as we choose? If we go to a store and pick something up and do not commit to pay for it at the cashier, then we would be stealing. Of course this specific example of commitment can be taken in a negative sense, because of its corrective motive: the seller wants an immediate payment instead of trusting that the buyer would eventually pay for the item (because most likely it will not happen!). This is definitely not how I think of marriage or relationships by any means, but it is important to underline that the so-called “benefit” that cohabitation brings and marriage does not is thought to be exactly that: the lack of commitment.

As I have shortly sketched, if “commitment” has proven itself as fruitful in every other human task or relationship, why would the lack thereof not be fruitful and beneficial in a relationship between a man and a woman? I realize that the problem of cohabitation is much more complex that I’m portraying it here, but think about it. What is the “essential bond” uniting two people who live together? A mere roof over their heads? It seems to me that the fundamental “bond” that unites two people who choose to “live together” (i.e. lack of commitment) is in itself a fallacy—a myth believed and lived by many. It simply does not make any sense: “I want you to live with me, but without getting married yet. Let’s just try this out and see if we want to get married or not.” This sounds like test-driving a car, but not buying it in the end. In other words, just as we treat a car we can say to that person: “Come and let me try you out, but keep in mind that I don’t have any contract saying that I need to take you in the end. I can just walk out of the lot without you and I can still shop around.”

Are these non-committal relationships successful? No. Let us look at the numbers (H/T: J. Lee Lagers, PhD Blog):

Are those who chose to move in together simply giving the relationship a trial run to ensure that the marriage that follows will be lasting? Statistics show that this doesn’t seem to work. More than half of the marriages that originate with cohabiting couples end within five years.

Are they thinking that a relationship free of obligations or commitment will be stronger? Again, the facts say no. Half of cohabiting relationships end within one year. However, rather than judging these people, I wish we in the married community would work harder to create authentic harmony and deeply rooted stability so that we could be a model to follow.

I think if we would surrender ourselves to one another, keeping our focus on God’s design and purpose for marriage, reasonable people would ask “How can I build a good marriage like that?” rather than “How can I find relational fulfillment in some way other than marriage?”

Emphasis mine. I think that Dr. Lager’s words are very wise. Cohabitation is not only a problem of young or single people, but very much a problem that should worry those who are married. We need to show as people of faith and as self-emptying people that marriage can work and that it can bring the most beautiful things out of these two people who united themselves in love and commitment for each other.

Previous Post

January 4, 2008

Iowa in Review

Next Post

January 4, 2008 "Huck's win and the Revenge of the SoCons"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal spoke to Balaam?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A dove A lamb A lion A donkey