Gnosticism. Some of Its Beliefs, Practices, and its Continued Influence in the World. Part II

Last updated on: December 30, 2007 at 5:45 pm by Henry Karlson

Gnosticism. Some of Its Beliefs, Practices, and its Continued Influence in the World. Part II 2007-12-30T17:45:03-05:00 Henry Karlson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Part I.

The opponents of Gnosticism did not deny the idea that some could have better knowledge than others in the world. Nor did they reject the idea that God could and would reveal himself to the world. Indeed, they would not deny the superiority of Christian revelation over any other religious tradition. They knew that God could and did show himself to the world, that revelation was not only possible but that it had been given, and God’s revelation was what made Christianity superior to all other religions.

But they emphasized that it is not merely a belief in some exclusive knowledge that saved; rather, it was the work of God. Because people are different, one from another, certainly some will understand the doctrines and teachings of the Christian faith better than others. But, in theory at least, people are free to explore their faith, and to learn all that is possible for one to learn without restrictions upon that learning; the teachings of the Christian faith are open to all who are willing to engage them and put them into practice. One does not need any special initiation paved by simony to learn the fullness of the faith. It has always been clear that one’s salvation and place in the kingdom of God is not based upon how well one understands the great mysteries of the faith, but how well one lives out that faith. Does one act as God wants them act? Does one heed the call of God in their life and follow him wherever he should lead? Some of the greatest, holiest exemplars of the Christian life came from those who were simple minded. What made them great is that they were so pure at heart that God wrought great things through them. This is not to say knowledge and wisdom should be ignored, or even worse, ridiculed. We are called to realize our vocation according to what God has given to us, and for some, this path takes them to study and to become scholars. Whatever standing one is to have in life, they should not look down upon those whose life and calling are different, rather, they should glorify all who properly live out the will of God in their lives.

The content of Gnostic theology was shown to be outright diabolical. This was especially true in regards to its proclamation of salvation where they taught that salvation was properly given to some “elite” alone. The Church had to reject this soteriology. Certainly, when examining their teachings , the Church realized that not everything the Gnostics said was wrong. Moreover, many questions they raised were legitimate. But their overarching system was dangerous and needed to be rejected. As to the secret tradition which the Gnostics claimed, Christianity replied with the teachings of the Apostolic tradition. There was no secondary, hidden tradition; there was only the open tradition of the faith founded by the Apostles and passed on down, in the open, to their successors. “It is within the power of all, therefore, in every Church, who may wish to see the truth, to contemplate clearly the tradition of the apostles manifested throughout the whole world; and we are in a position to reckon up those who were by the apostles instituted bishops in the Churches, and [to demonstrate] the succession of these men to our own times; those who neither taught nor knew of anything like what these [heretics] rave about. For if the apostles had known hidden mysteries, which they were in the habit of imparting to ‘the perfect’ apart and privily from the rest, they would have delivered them especially to those to whom they were also committing the Churches themselves. For they were desirous that these men should be very perfect and blameless in all things, whom also they were leaving behind as their successors, delivering up their own place of government to these men; which men, if they discharged their functions honestly, would be a great boon [to the Church], but if they should fall away, the direst calamity,” Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses. trans Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson. ANF1 (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdman’s Publishing), III-3.1.

One of the reasons why the Gnostics were a great threat to the Church is that they tried to claim the authority of Christianity, to be true Christianity, while teaching error upon error, thoughts and practices which openly contradicted the basic tenets of the Christian faith. The Gnostics wanted to have it both ways. They wanted to be seen as Christians, because this would attract other Christians into their sects; but they also wanted to be seen as superior to other Christians, and for people to believe that they were given a greater, fuller revelation, one which selected individuals were allowed to know only after they have been accepted into their elite Gnostic group (not unlike the later claims of many other secret societies such as the Freemasons or the Rosicrucians).

Unlike what many of the Gnostics said, Christ affirmed the validity of the Torah, and had seen no need for us to utterly reject the world. He was its creator and he had come into it for its own good. Of course Christians know that the world we live in is fallen world, and so we do not believe what we see is as good as it should be. But that means the world can be better, and through Christ will be made better. We are to work for its transformation and purification. We pray for the kingdom of God to be on earth as it is in heaven, not for God to annihilate it. Of course we must not have any hubris and think this is something we can do entirely by ourselves. But it is not to be done without our work and our cooperation with the will of God. Christ sends us out into the world. Christians are called to be mediators of God’s grace to the rest of creation. As grace perfects us, so it too will perfect the rest of nature.

The Gnostics presented in their writings and speculations a profound rejection of the world. Since its origin lies with some ignorant or evil creator, it has no lasting significance. Clearly what the Gnostic taught was opposite of what Christianity believed: either God the creator was good or evil, either all-knowing or ignorant. Since Christianity had always taught a wise, benevolent, all-loving creator, this belief would become the means by which Christianity would be able to reject the so-called knowledge of the Gnostics. Instead of truth, they professed a lie; instead of wisdom, they provided folly. St Irenaeus would not accept their claim to knowledge, and would refer to them only as the “so-called” Gnostics. Around the same time, St Clement of Alexandria would point out that it was only the Christian, following all the teachings of Christ, who could be called a true Gnostic. “So, then, also the Gnostics who tread in the footsteps of the apostles ought to be sinless, and, out of love to the Lord, to love also their brother; so that, if occasion call, enduring without stumbling, afflictions for the Church, ‘they may drink the cup.’ Those who witness in their life by deed, and at the tribunal by word, whether entertaining hope or surmising fear, are better than those who confess salvation by their mouth alone. But if one ascend also to love, he is a really blessed and true martyr, having confessed perfectly both to the commandments and to God, by the Lord; whom having loved, he acknowledged a brother, giving himself up wholly for God, resigning pleasantly and lovingly the man when asked, like a deposit,” Clement of Alexandria, Stromata. Trans Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson. ANF2 (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdman’s Publishing) IV-IX. By following the faith as it is transmitted by the Church, a faith that is lived out in the flesh and through the sacraments sanctifies that flesh, one comes to know the true Lord of Salvation. “Faith itself builds true philosophy, that is, true conversion on the journey to take through life. Hence, authentic ‘gnosis’ is a development of faith inspired by Jesus Christ in the soul united with him, ” Pope Benedict XVI, General Audience, April 18, 2007.

Facing such a difficult opposition, Gnostics tried to justify themselves by creating books which claimed to be the real teachings of the Apostles. Some were easily seen by all for the forgeries they were, but, by the fact so many Gnostics attempted this kind of subterfuge, some books were more difficult to dismiss and challenged the authority of the Church. Looking at them, we can see that some, like the Gospel of Thomas, were closer in spirit and thought to true Christianity. This explains why even today some people consider them as authentic sources of Christian thought. Indeed, we can admit that some of them probably did mix in elements of the Apostolic tradition, known by all at the time but lost in the annals of history. For this reason, a scholar could use them to help understand the beliefs of ancient Christians. But the key here is that such a scholar must be careful, and not seduced by the Gnostics. Vladimir Solovyov, perhaps more than anyone else, showed us how difficult and valuable such an exploration can be, but even he, in the care he took to overcome the errors of the Gnostics, had problems overcoming their influences.

For most people, there is no need for such exploration, because the danger is ever present when one studies the writings of the Gnostics, and they can slowly affect the way we think of the world and our Christian faith by the power of suggestion. For example, Gnostic eschatology has had a profound influence on the history of Christian thought and especially on how many, if not most, Christians view salvation. How is eternal life presented to the public at large? We die and go to heaven, existing, as it were, as spirits or angels for all eternity. What role is there for the body here? What need is there for it? None. This popular understanding of eternal life does not show any comprehension or understanding that eternal life will begin with a universal resurrection of the dead and a restoration of the world to it ideal existence. “We know that the whole creation has been groaning in travail together until now; and not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies” (Rom 8:22-23).

One can but wonder how this popular vision of Christianity became the norm. People can hold this mistaken view and still find salvation. But it is clear that this view is dangerous, and many people start with it and use it to justify practices which can and do harm souls and bodies. For the Gnostics, this belief suggested one of two ways of life. Some Gnostics rejected the flesh so much that they became austere ascetics, condemning any and all who live normal lives within the world. The ways of the world were to be entirely rejected; severe fasting and sexual abstinence were required for salvation. By doing this one slowly freed oneself from the prison of the flesh. We can find examples of this kind of Gnosticism in the teachings of Saturninus, an early Gnostic, or with the later Encratites following Tatian. Saturninus’ followers, who were probably far more radical than the Encratites, said that “marriage and generation are from Satan,” and that many “who belong to his school, abstain from animal food, and draw away multitudes by a feigned temperance of this kind,” Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, I.XXIV.2 For other Gnostics, the response was libertine. Since the world is evil, its mores are also evil. Instead of abstinence, promiscuity became the norm. For Gnostics of this kind, such as the Carpocrates, many of their religious services were agape “love feasts” which were nothing else than gluttonous meals followed by wild, free-for-all orgies, the kind of which became quite famous in the Roman world (cf. Clement,StromataIII-II). They justified these actions by all kinds of strange theological explanations (the Carpocrates, for example, said that it was by experiencing all that is possible in the flesh we grow tired of the flesh and we will therefore be ready to experience the higher, spiritual realms when we die). Because these Gnostics were believed to be Christians by the non-Christians, we can understand why Roman officials often believed Christians were morally lax. “These men, even as the Gentiles, have been sent forth by Satan to bring dishonour upon the Church, so that, in one way or another, men hearing the things which they speak, and imagining that we all are such as they, may turn away their ears from the preaching of the truth; or, again, seeing the things they practise, may speak evil of us all, who have in fact no fellowship with them, either in doctrine or in morals, or in our daily conduct,”Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, I.XXV.3. While many might suggest that modern-day “spiritualists” who hold a similar eschatology do not follow such harmful and dishonorable teachings as these, if we just explore the situation further, we will see that this is not the case.

Previous Post

December 29, 2007

Meditation for Christmas Season

Next Post

December 30, 2007 The Holy Family, Refugees in a Strange Land

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Judas Iscariot Barabbas James