When All Else Fails, Play the Abortion Card

Last updated on: September 28, 2007 at 10:52 pm by Morning's Minion

When All Else Fails, Play the Abortion Card 2007-09-28T22:52:08-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Bush has been saying quite clearly that he would veto the bipartisan S-CHIP re-authorization bill on the grounds that it went too far, and would divert some children from private to public insurance. But, according to the National Catholic Register (NCR), Bush was really trying to stop S-CHIP from opening the abortion floodgates. Funny, if that were truly the case, you would think Bush would be trumpeting this loudly. Does the NCR know something we don’t?

Eh, no. Here’s NCR’s story: S-CHIP was founded in 1997 to provide health care to poor children, but the current re-authorization is “taking dollars from U.S. taxpayers’ paychecks and using them to pay for abortions”. In its words:

“So why is it being vetoed now? Because when the Congress changed hands in 2005, new legislators were put in charge, and they decided to make two significant changes in the S-CHIP program. First, lawmakers changed the definition of “children.” Republicans had made sure the previous S-CHIP program defined children as anyone “from conception to age 19.” That meant that pre-natal care was available to pregnant woman — for the sake of the children. The new Congress removed that definition. Second, lawmakers added “pregnancy services” to the bill. Through this program, money withheld from your paycheck for taxes could now end up in the paycheck of an abortionist living in one of 17 states.”

Conclusion: “it shows how crucially important it is that we have a pro-life president.” I kid you not, that’s the language used. A president proves his pro-life credentials by vetoing a bill to provide heath care to uninsured children.

Needless to say, the NCR is hopelessly off the mark. Here’s the real story: after S-CHIP was implemented, it became clear that, although a child born to low-income parents would receive care after birth, the mother would not receive any prenatal care. As as result, there were numerous proposals to extend S-CHIP funds to pregnant women. In 2002, the Bush administration circumvented the issue by defining a child from the moment of conception. To be sure, the pro-life lobby saw this as a direct challenge. But for others too, there were more practical considerations, the most important one being the distinction created between mother and child. The professional organizations (including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics) all favored treating the mother and the unborn child together. The were some serious grey areas: what about anesthesia during delivery? What if the mother required care after birth? It was quite clear that women were not covered for postpartum care “because they are not services for an eligible child”.

The key issue for the NCR is the proposed change in the definition of “child”, reverting to the pre-2002 standard while covering pregnant women. And since even the most ardent pro-abortion supporters acknowledged that the 2002 change has no impact on abortion, it is hard to see how undoing that change will have any effect either. For sure, both sides are playing charged political games with the definition of “child”. I will not deny that the changing definition has a political intent: it would not be difficult to retain the definition of child from conception and also provide care for the mother. But that is largely a side show, a diversion from the issue at hand. As regards abortion, the S-CHIP rules seem particularly explicit: only “to save the life of the mother, or to terminate a pregnancy resulting from an act of rape or incest”.

It’s one thing to argue, as Richard Doerflinger did, that S-CHIP should be re-authorized, but that members of Congress should try to retain the unborn child clause. It’s another thing altogether to obfuscate and claim that a re-authorized S-CHIP would lead to a flurry of abortions, and that Bush is vetoing on these grounds. Shame on NCR for taking such liberties with the facts.

What are the Catholic organizations saying? Well, Catholic Charities is urging passage of the bill, with Fr. Larry Snyder noting that:

“It would be unconscionable if the White House and Congress weakened this valuable program- leaving millions of children without health coverage- when everyone agrees that the program works– that is wrong, and it sends the wrong message about our nation’s values… We are extremely disappointed that the president-just last week-reiterated his intent to veto this bi-partisan bill. Mr. President, we call on you to keep your promise to America’s children and sign this bill into law “

The Catholic Health Association also threw its weight behind the bipartisan compromise and urged Bush to change his mind and sign. And the Washington State Catholic Conferencealso called for the bill to be supported, as the bipartisan compromise included “many, but not all” of the components in the USCCB and Catholic Charities’ priorities.

So what’s going on here? This is an attempt to derail an important piece of social legislation by playing the abortion card. Sadly, many in the organized pro-life movement serve the role of “useful idiots” in a broader political movement more concerned with keeping the grubby hands of government away from private wealth than with supporting respect for life and human dignity. This movement seems to enjoy great success in convincing the pro-life lobby to oppose the role of the state in universal health care provision. For example, many fear single payer systems because they think it will mandate abortion. Other examples abound.

As for the most ludicrous example of all: as I noted before, the National Right to Life Committee lists opposition to government negotiation with drug companies to bring down the price of medicine as one of the main items on its agenda. They claim that the rationing of health care may foster euthanasia. I’m glad they are worried about rationing. But they have little to say about the 47 million without health insurance, the 40 percent of Americans who stayed away from a doctor in the past few years based on cost, or the fact that waiting lists are no shorter in America that in countries with universal health care. They do not seem to be aware that all insurance providers negotiate with drug companies, and the use of monopsony power to attain lower prices is standard market practice. It has nothing to do with rationing. It has everything to do with subsidizing the drug companies (it’s no surprise that person who pushed the Medicare part D bill– forbidding any such negotiation– through Congress, Billy Tauzin, resigned immediately after the passage of the bill to become head of the major trade group for pharmaceutical companies). Useful idiots, indeed.

What’s next, I wonder? Reducing carbon emissions will cause people to abort their children and kill their grandparents. Ending the war in Iraq means Al Qaeda will target American unborn children? Gun control stops a woman from protecting the child in her womb? If these examples sound ridiculous, well, that is exactly the point.

Previous Post

September 28, 2007

The Connecticut Bishops and Plan B

Next Post

September 29, 2007 What American Papist isn't telling you about Plan B

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian tradition refers to its pastors as "elders"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Presbyterian Anglican Orthodox Catholic