The U.S. Government and Brutal Dictators

Last updated on: September 11, 2007 at 8:46 pm by Policraticus

The U.S. Government and Brutal Dictators 2007-09-11T20:46:05-05:00 Policraticus

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the comment box of Nate’s meditation on the U.S. response to 9/11, our own Alexham asked the following questions with regard to the motivating factors that led to President George W. Bush’s orders for the invasion, conquering and occupation of Iraq:

Could it be that the United States also took into consideration that Iraq was being ruled by a brutal dictator who had (and still was) committing genocide against his own people? And what are we to do in those circumstances? Turn a blind eye?

Christopher Blosser wrote sardonically of Alexham’s comment with seeming approval:

Come now, that’s crazy talk.

Since the invasion of Iraq, and especially since our government has come to the realization that no discernible link between Saddham Hussein’s regime and al-Qaeda and no trace of weapons of mass destruction other than the chemical weapons (of which we already aware) were found, the apologists of the Iraq War have made continual reference to the removal of a “brutal dictator” who continuously committed “genocide against his own people” both to support the the U.S. invasion and to bolster the image of the benevolence and global conscience of the Bush administration. And while the brutality of Saddham was frequently mentioned by Bush in the months and weeks leading up to the invasion and was listed as one of many justifications for that invasion, it was never cited as a definitive reason for war. Indeed, if we take a brief look at U.S. foreign policy since World War II, Bush’s alleged compassion for the Iraqi people can hardly be taken as anything more than mere tokenism.

The U.S. government over the past sixty years has quite a track record for political, economic and military support for the “brutal dictator” who commits “genocide against his own people.” This is an undeniable historical fact of American foreign policy, and to deny this fact is to delve into delusion. The government of the post-World World II United States has never been moved to remove a brutal dictator on account of his brutality, genocide and oppressive rule. Quite the contrary, in fact. The U.S. government has on a number of occasions supported and strengthened brutal dictators in whom it has discerned an political ally or with whom it has projected economic gain.

A few examples should illustrate this trend:

In 1933, U.S. Special Envoy to Cuba, Sumner Welles, who would later become Under Secretary of State under Franklin D. Roosevelt, supported the violent “Sergeants’ Revolt” that ousted Carlos Manuel de Céspedes. Fulgencio Batista was the leader of this revolt. The U.S. had been actively involved in deposing President Gerardo Machado since the late 1920’s in order to stabilize the Cuban political situation and open up economic lines between the two countries. The U.S. increased trade with Cuba when Fulgencio Batista was elected president in 1940. Batista held the presidential office until 1944, when he was defeated by Ramón Grau. However, in 1952 he ran for president again but trailed significantly in the polls. He staged a violent military coup in order to take over power, and U.S. President Harry Truman, despite the undemocratic and violent power snatching, formally recognized Batista as the President of Cuba. The U.S. supported Batista for economic reasons until 1958 when it was apparent that Batista’s lack of popularity among Cubans weakened economic viability. Only then was an arms embargo put into place. During its time of power, Batista’s regime was a violent and paranoid one. Many political prisoners were systematically executed for their opposition to Batista, and inmates of Cuban prisoners were tortured for information on any suspected insurrections. Batista’s was a gangster-run government; he used hired help to settle debts and to muscle business and he used the military to create an ambiance of fear and violence through street patrol, round-ups of those suspected of dissent and censorship of the press. Yet, despite Batista’s violence, murdering and suppression of human rights, the U.S. government supported his rule, even providing haven to him during and after his time in office. Not only did Batista represent an improvement in trade with Cuba for the U.S., he also ensured that the Soviets would have no hand in shaping the economic and political identity in Cuba (hence, the later vehement U.S. opposition to Castro).

I’ve mentioned before at this blog the “Dirty War” of Argentina, which lasted from 1976-1983. It was nearly a decade of violence carried out against Argentine citizens by presidents Jorge Rafael Videla, Roberto Eduardo Violaand, Leopoldo Galtieri and their successive military government. The government sought to obliterate all “leftist” resistance and influence within Argentine society. It is widely believed that up to 30,000 Argentine citizens and refugees from Chile and Uruguay disappeared during the Dirty War. They were arrested, tortured and killed, most of them being trade unionists and students. Seeing a neo-liberal and capitalist ally in the Argentine regimes, the U.S. was supportive of these military governments despite having knowledge of the systematic arrests and killings of civilians. Then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger wished to remain friendly and supportive of Argentina in the late 1970’s on account of Videla’s anti-communist leanings. Kissenger apparently felt that having a Cold War ally was more important than objecting to the wide-spread human rights violations being committed in Argentina by far-right organizations (read: death squads) such as the Argentine Anticommunist Alliance. One cannot forget that Republican administrations of the second half of the twentieth century especially have had a penchant for supporting violent and oppressive regimes out of politico-economic interests (e.g., Pinochet, Batista and Abdullah). The Argentine government was given the impression that Washington was supportive of its actions despite the protest of the U.S. embassy in Argentina. Under Jimmy Carter, the U.S. backed off from its support of Argentina, but Ronald Reagan reversed this trend when he sought Argentine assistance in training Contras for guerrilla warfare in Nicaragua. The Ford and Reagan administrations turned a blind eye to the injustices and murders in Argentina, perceiving a greater good in bolstering neo-liberal (i.e., democratic capitalist) interests in Latin America and subverting a burgeoning Marxism in various Latin American countries. In 2002, the U.S. State Department declassified more than 4,600 documents pertaining to the Dirty War and U.S. involvement with, and support of, the Argentine regimes. The U.S. chose several times to ally itself out of economic interest with some of the most violent and cruel regimes of Latin America rather than standing up for the human rights of the innocent civilians.

Though there are many other dictators I can mention who were supported by the U.S. government, I believe I can close with a reminder that the U.S. not only helped put Saddam into power in the first place, but also supported him economically and militarily while he was committing genocide against his own people. After the overthrow of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had U.S. support, the Ayatollah Khomeini took control of Iran, inciting Shi’ite backlash against Saddam in Iraq. While fighting in the Iran-Iraq War, Saddam murdered, executed, imprisoned and tortured tens of thousands of Iraqis who were plotting against him or who were suspected of insurrection. The worst of Saddam’s genocide occurred during the period of this war, which happened to be when Saddam had the vigilant and stalwart support of the U.S. government. Ronald Reagan, who simultaneously aided Latin American dictators, gave $40 billion in aid to Saddam’s regime to combat Iran. According to The National Security Archive at George Washington University, Reagan gave Saddam additional billions as a bribe to keep Iraq from becoming a Soviet ally. Iraq was the third largest recipient of U.S. aid under the Reagan administration. Even after Saddam had used chemical weapons on Iran and on the Kurds of Iraq, Reagan and then-National Security Advisor Colin Powell opposed leveling any sanctions on Iraq. Iraq was a strategic ally both economically and politically, as its modernization was well underway and the country was seen as potentially a U.S. touchstone for influence in the Middle East and the bolstering of Israel (of course, none of this unrolled until 2003).

So whenever I read about how benevolent the current U.S. administration was in removing a “brutal dictator” for the sake of freedom of the innocent, I admire the dream but scoff at the naivete. It is not in our political blood to remove dictators simply to protect the innocent. When the U.S. has removed regimes or has attempted to do so (e.g., Iran, Cuba, Peru, Nicaragua) , it was always with the goal of forwarding the economic and political goals of U.S. foreign policy. On the flip side, in the past sixty years, the U.S. government has actually provided economic and political support for brutal dictators in exchange for economic productivity and allied resistance to communism or whatever ideology is considered to be maliciously opposed to the liberal democratic model. In between these two actions rests the most common option of U.S. foreign intervention: apathy. The U.S. is not in the business of removing dictators–no matter how brutal or how evil–if it will not help in accomplishing the goals of foreign policy. And Saddam is no exception. Relations with Saddam cooled in the early 1990’s, and ever since he threatened the oil market in 1991, the U.S. has had an invested interest in seeing to his demise. 2003 just so happened to offer that golden opportunity to Bush.

Previous Post

September 11, 2007

"Pro-Life Group Passes IRS Exam After Pro-Abortion Groups File Complaints"

Next Post

September 11, 2007 Latest Iraqi Poll

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Romans teaches that we are justified by works of the law.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE