How Voodoo Became Mainstream

Last updated on: September 5, 2007 at 7:30 pm by Morning's Minion

How Voodoo Became Mainstream 2007-09-05T19:30:18-05:00 Morning's Minion

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The always reliable Jonathan Chait has a new book, provocatively titled The Big Con: The True Story of How Washington Got Hoodwinked and Hijacked by Crackpot Economics. His focus is on supply-side economics, and how it went from a fringe crackpot theory to the dominant mode of thinking on the American right. Of course, the theory never ceased to be a crackpot theory, and the elder Bush’s castigation of “voodoo economics” holds true today as much as yesterday. What happened was that the core interest group in the Republican party– the monied interests, the corporate donors, the rich– favored tax cuts. But the party could not very well advertize tax cuts for the rich because Enron would gain, or because Steve Forbes would dramatically increase his wealth. No, they needed a theory claiming that everybody would benefit.

Before getting to the theory itself, we should pause for a second and consider what really drives the Republican party. As Kevin Drum’s review of Chait’s book notes succinctly, it’s not the “neocons” or the “theocons”, but the “moneycons”. Just follow the money. After the 2004 election, Bush abruptly stopped talking about abortion and gay marriage and started talking about privatizing social security and making his tax cuts permanent. David Kuo, the former second-in-command at the White House Faith-Based Office, has said that the faith-based initiatives were there to serve a political end, and that Rove’s office viewed them as “nuts”. Tucker Carlson also confirmed this last year, appealing to his personal knowledge, declaring that the “deep truth is that the elites in the Republican Party have pure contempt for the evangelicals who put their party in power.” Keep following the money…

So what is supply side economics? It is basically the notion that tax cuts are a panacea for all the evils in the world. If I exaggerate, it is slight. One of the architects, Jude Wanniski, once explained the belligerence of nazi Germany from the fact that Hitler insisted on keeping taxes high. The idea germinated in the mind of Arthur Laffer, and it is underpinned by a trivial observation: incentives matter. If the tax rate is zero, your revenue will be zero. If you set the marginal tax rate at 100 percent, you can be sure be observe a large diminution in effort, with knock-on effects for revenue. Hence, Laffer claimed, by cutting taxes, you actually increase revenue because of positive incentive effects. Growth will be higher, inflation will be lower, and the coffers will be overflowing. The economy will be swimming in so much bounty that nobody will even notice that the rich are making out like bandits.

Of course, as Chait notes, this idea is ludicrous. For a start, how can you be certain that you are on the downward sloping part of the Laffer curve, assuming this portion even exists? You can’t. No reputable economist ever bought this idea. Laffer remained an isolated figure and his acolytes who sold the theory had no economics training whatsoever. Note that it is a perfectly reputable argument to claim that incentives matter for growth and that cutting taxes can add to the growth rate at the margin. The crackpot element comes in when somebody argues that this effect is so great, so enormously powerful, that it reverses the revenue loss from the tax cut.

Of course, this hypothesis should be easy to verify, and unfortunately for the supply-siders, history is not on their side. As Chait notes, the top marginal tax rate from 1947-64 was 91 percent, and 70 percent from 1964-73. Yet during this entire period, the economy grew at an impressive 4 percent a year, and the benefits of growth were shared widely. The boom took place in spite of the high taxes. As we all know, Reagan lowered the top marginal rate dramatically, and it reached 28 percent in 1986. In 1991, Bush raised the top marginal rate to 31 percent. Despite this marginal increase, relative to what came before, the supply-siders screamed bloody murder. The economy was on the verge of tanking, they cried. And yet nothing happened. Instead, on the back of Bush’s tax increase and Clinton’s balanced-budget measures, the economy rose precipitously throughout the 1990s, and everybody gained. The world did not end.

The supply-side industry was undaunted by facts. But one of the traits of the modern pseudo-conservative movement is that ideology matters more than evidence. In a sense, they have embraced the most cynical form of postmodernism in that they believe they can mold facts to conform to a pre-existing ideology. As many have noted, there is an almost complete disregard for policy analysis in the current regime. It is ideology above all. With this in mind, it is no real surprise that the first politician Laffer converted to the cause (using his infamous napkin) was Dick Cheney.

But still, the Republican party at the time was cautious and sober. It believed in things like balanced budgets and fiscal prudence. The transformation was complete when Bob Dole, one of the last remaining of the old guard, capitulated completely and endorsed the supply side theory in 1996. And now, the theory is treated as basic truth. Nobody raises an eyebrow when Bush the younger touts tax cuts as the answer to everything and says things like “the deficit would have been bigger without the tax-relief package”.

Let’s address the Bush tax cuts for a second. The consensus is that they stimulated the economy during the downturn of 2001 as private investment collapsed. The manner was typically Keynesian, as consumers responded positively to a higher disposable income. Even here, many economists dispute the “bang for buck” effect as most of the tax cuts were directly toward the rich who tended to consume a smaller percentage of their income. Also, as we are now coming to grips with, a flush of global liquidity and lax regulations contributed to an housing price bubble that (more than any tax cuts) kept the economy afloat (for a while, at least). But I don’t want to digress. Nobody really believes the growth in the past few years came from incentive effects on the supply side. Nobody seriously believes that the deficit would have been higher without the tax cuts (many confuse base and policy effects here). That is not to say the tax cuts were a bad idea at the time; it’s just that their efficacy had nothing to do with the supply-side ideology.

It’s all about spin. As Chait notes, the Bush tax cuts were not even sold on supply-side grounds. First it was returning the surplus to the people, then it was fighting a recession, then fairness. They played down the argument that cutting taxes on the rich would lift all boats and pay for itself. Why? Because it still sounds a little… voodoo. Any excuse will do. The attempt to avoid talking about the subject takes on a strangely Orwellian tone. The estate tax on the ultra-wealthy becomes a tax on death. Senator Jeff Sessions even tried to find somebody who had died in Hurricane Katrina that was suffering from the estate tax. Remember, ideology above all! (he didn’t find anyone, by the way). Similarly, pro-business environmental policies are given innocuous-sounding names like “Healthy Forests” and “Clear Skies.” Medicare legislation written by drug companies designed to send a huge subsidy to drug companies is sold as a boon to the elderly.

This is all clearly in the domain of prudential judgment, which we know concerns the application of Catholic teaching to changing concrete facts and circumstances. In terms of the economy, we need to be guided by notions like solidarity and the preferential option for the poor. This means we must do out best to sift through the evidence, and not be blinded by ideology. For example, many people used to believe that boosting government spending was the best way to fulfill our duty to the poor. Others argued that balancing the budget must come first, as the Clinton boom was the first tide to rise all boats since 1974. These are useful debates. But what we cannot do is simply ignore and twist the facts to favor a chosen ideology, especially when a preferential option for the rich lies behind this ideology. Supporting policies on these terms is a gross abuse of the term “prudential judgment”.

Let me end with the great unspoken word in the debate: inequality. Since the 1970s, the share of income going to the top 1 percent has doubled, while for the top 0.1 percent, it has trplied, and quadrupled for the top 0.01 percent. It seems obvious that the post-tax redistribution toward the rich bears some blame here, as does the continuous process of de-unionization, shifting bargaining power away from workers. Rising inequality is something we need to address, but the frame of the current debate is such that it is completely frozen out. I’ll leave the last word with Chait: “The conservatives of today … have redefined conservatism as an expression of their material self-interest, defined in the narrowest and most short-sighted terms.” Indeed.

Economy

Morning's Minion

Previous Post

September 5, 2007

Universality of God's Creation

Next Post

September 6, 2007 Usury

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Roman centurion was the first Gentile baptized in Acts?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Felix Cornelius Julius Agrippa