Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Romney on Abortion, The Mormon’s on Abortion, and Anything Else That Happens to Come Up Due to the Lack of an Unbiased vox-Editor

Romney on Abortion, The Mormon’s on Abortion, and Anything Else That Happens to Come Up Due to the Lack of an Unbiased vox-Editor

Last updated on: August 11, 2007 at 3:58 am by voxnovablog

Romney on Abortion, The Mormon’s on Abortion, and Anything Else That Happens to Come Up Due to the Lack of an Unbiased vox-Editor 2007-08-11T03:58:00-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Hat tip to Jimmy Akin (http://jimmyakin.typepad.com/defensor_fidei/2007/08/mitt-romney-on-.html) for posting a recent radio interview between a prominent Des Moines, Iowa radio talk show host and former Governor Mitt Romney (MA), presently leading many polls for the Republican representation in the 2008 Presidential Election, on his web blog (http://www.jimmyakin.typepad.com/, August 6, 2007).

The interview, running almost 20 minutes, includes some very revealing conversation concerning abortion and (implicitly) the manner in which a “man of faith” approaches “public service”, i.e. as the hypothetical President of the United States.

Roe v. Wade – Law of the Land… “now”

One of the more illuminating portions of the discussion was when the Host asked if “… Roe v. Wade is the law of the land”. Romney answered, “It is now”. Apparently Romney’s opinion is that the decision should be “overturned” and “left to the States”.

Romney’s personal view concerning abortion apparently changed during his tenure as Governor as Massachusetts. Describing his view when entering office, he said that he was Pro-Choice (though he did admit that he didn’t favor that misnomer at the time), then became “Pro-Life”[1] after having to deal with decisions as Governor[2].

Personal Faith in the Public Office

After describing the “change” to a “Pro-Life” position as Governor, the Host really shifted the discussion to Romney’s Mormon faith[3], its stance on abortion, how this plays out in his Public Service.

“…[T]he church’s official position… forever… states that…” a Mormon is uncompromisingly “Pro-Life”, says the host.

At first, Romney appeared to accept the host’s statement regarding the position of the Mormon church and chose to respond by reminding the listeners (like a good politician) that “…the great thing about this Country [is that] individuals who run for secular office are not implementing the policies of their church but … what they think is right for the Nation…”.

The Host “stirred the pot” when he brought up Kennedy as an example, who was criticized by many for segregating his personal faith from the public office. I found this interesting in that, to an extent, there is a truth in what Romney (and Kennedy) are saying: it is not the responsibility of a Mormon (or Catholic) politician to implement the dictates of their personal faith. However, there is an overarching Law that does indeed need implementation, regardless of what the “masses” say in a “democracy”: Natural Law.[4] Of course, the discussion never gets this far, but it is an extremely important “nuance” in the debate surrounding how a man of “faith” balances his personal and public responsibilities.

The Mormon Faith and “It’s Official Position” on Abortion

While Romney responds saying that “he is not going to have a conversation” about his church’s views, this is actually what ends up happening, both on and off the air, for the rest of the interview.[5]

Romney caves in, saying, “There are people in my church who are ‘pro-choice’…that is not against my church’s view…”.

The Host, who continually reads some ‘source’ that is never identified, again says that the Mormon’s official stance is unambiguously “Pro-Life”.

Romney emphatically reacts: “You happen to be incorrect on that…”!

Interestingly, Romney is the one that is (more) correct here.

While the Mormon church asserts that abortion is “one of the most…sinful practices of this day”[6], there seems to be a some official theological inconsistency. Isaiah Bennett, author of Inside Mormonism, says that the most apparent view of the Mormon church would leave outsiders (and, indeed, some insiders) to think that the church’s stance is crystal clear, but the reality is that the church is as “Pro-Life” as George W. Bush is, leaving room for abortion in “problem pregnancy” situations:[7]

…[T]he Mormon church opens itself to the charge of grave hypocrisy when it presents itself to the public as unabashedly pro-family and pro-life. There is an underside to this righteous self-portrait, and further examination… yields evidence of serious cracks in Mormonism’s pro-life foundation…

The Mormon church places itself in an untenable position: it opposes abortion because abortion takes the life of an innocent human child, a gift from the Lord, making abortion a selfish, cruel act, comparable to murder in gravity. Yet Mormon leadership consistently allows for exceptions. These exceptions are spelled out by the leaders [of the church]. Gospel Principles, a manual of belief and practice published by the Church of Jesus Christ of Ladder-day Saints, stated in its 1979 and 1988 editions, “There is no excuse for abortion unless the life of the mother is seriously threatened”[8] (243 and 241, respectively).[9]

Bennett adds that in the 1992 edition of the Gospel Principles (cf. 251), the following was added:

There is seldom any excuse for abortion. The only exceptions are when: 1. Pregnancy has resulted from incest or rape. 2. The life or health or the woman is in jeopardy in the opinion of competent medical authority; or 3. The fetus is known, by competent medical authority, to have severe defects that will not allow the baby to survive beyond birth.[10]

In other words, the unborn is an innocent human life and the taking of that life is gravely immoral—comparable to murder—except when the above mentioned situations come into play.

The first issue is circumstantial, i.e. the manner in which the child came into being was itself immoral (rape, incest) and, thus, it makes void the normative stance that abortion is gravely wrong. The second issue again is circumstantial, yet different from the first. This exception implicitly states that the life of one is more important than the life of another. A difficult state of affairs, to be sure, but the exception undermines the foundation of a true “Pro-Life” stance. And, finally, the third circumstance amounts to euthanasia if actually carried out, i.e. the unborn person has defects which would make living, under such circumstances, improbable and, thus, it is acceptable to take the life of the child.

This portion of my comments are already much too long and I would hope that it would be unnecessary for me to outline why such stances are inconsistent with a truly “Pro-Life” world view. My main desire was to show that Romney, as opposed to the radio host and “conventional wisdom”, is correct—the Mormon church, in its official documents, are not consistently against abortion and one could, hypothetically, be a “good Mormon” and hold (what amounts to be) a weak and impractical “Pro-Life” position.

Thoughts on the Interview as a Whole

First of all, I might say that Romney is more of a “politician” that I was hoping. My wife and I do not have television, so it is rare for us to have the opportunity to see how people act. While the radio host forced the conversation into a pseudo-debate concerning the Mormon church’s stance on abortion and continually (albeit implicitly) questioned Romney’s understanding of the Mormon faith, the underlying opportunity for me, as a voting-Catholic-American, was to see how this politician would react to sincere (though mistaken) questions. My opinion is that he was condescending, sarcastic and disrespectful. While someone might respond to me saying that he was simply reacting to the host’s initiatives, I would say that the host isn’t running for Office.
Second, my initial reaction is that he seems to be personally consistent with regard to the “Pro-Life” question. He stated that he was once Pro-Choice (which, as displayed, is not entirely in opposition to Mormon doctrine), and that, once Governor, he became “Pro-Life”; he declared that Roe v. Wade should be overturned and that the decisions with regard to abortion law should be left up to the States; and he seems to have a more strict and tenable “Pro-Life” stance, i.e., he didn’t say that he thought that circumstances should make abortion a viable option.[11]

That being said, I do have one main concern about the consistency or credibility of his abortion view: If Roe v. Wade should be “over turned”, why should any decision concerning the issue be left to the States? Should a decision regarding murder in general be left to the States? Or theft? Or rape? In other words, is Romney here subjecting the issue to the decisions of government (at worst), or “majority vote” (democracy) at best? And if that is the case, then why not allow the issue to be a Federal one? Romney appears to be inconsistent here.

Could He Win the Presidency if He Received the Nomination?

While I have my personal concerns regarding his Pro-Life stance, I would also have to acknowledge the fact that the vast majority of voters in this Country will here “over turn Roe v. Wade” and make Romney out to be a strict “Pro-Life Conservative”. That being said, can Romney win a Presidential nomination in today’s culture when he is making it known that he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade?

No. I don’t think so.

The majority of Americans fall somewhere between the polar extremes of the two great misnomers: “Pro-Choice” and “Pro-Life”. There are many who believe that there are circumstantial allowances (rape, incest, deformity, life of mother, etc.) that make it necessary to keep a law protecting a (limited) right to abortion as an option on the part of the mother. There are others who would be outright opposed to abortion in the third trimester, but not the first or, possibly, the second trimester, etc.

However inconsistent such views are, one must acknowledge the reality that most people are in this “grey camp” when it comes to the abortion question: they are hesitant to allow abortion, and they are hesitant to make it completely against the law.

As such, I do not think that Romney could win against the likes of Obama or Clinton if he were to win the Republican nomination. I think that the vast majority of Americans will find such a view impractical and dangerous (that is, overturning Roe v. Wade), even if some people (like myself) feel that abortion should be completely banned.[12]

A Humble Reminder to All Catholics and Christians in General

While the main thrust of the topics herein have evolved around abortion, I would like to end by humbly reminding all people that there is much more to politics and our responsibility to vote than the issue of abortion.

While I in no way wish to diminish the importance of the subject, I strongly feel that most “good Catholics” are “one-issue-voters” and do not allow themselves to feel the tension that they should feel when thinking about all the issues together. For example, I think that Catholics voting next year would do well to consider some of the following:

1. What Can the President Actually Do? — What practically can a President do when it comes to the issue of abortion in this Country? Can the President actually overturn a Supreme Court decision? Depending on the answer to the question, the issue of abortion will take on a greater or minimized role in your decision when it comes time to vote.

2. The Questions of “Life” Transcend “Abortion” — To stick with the issue of “life”, Catholics should ask themselves how other “life issues” come into play. Too often Catholics will reduce the issue of “life” to “abortion”. There are other issues to consider: war, capital punishment, poverty, crime, drugs, nuclear policy, etc. etc. etc. While it is true that abortion is inherently different than “war” or “capital punishment” in that there is no circumstance that makes abortion “just”, there are, nonetheless, other “life issues” to consider. And many of these issues can be immediately affected by who the President of the United States is.

3. “Human Dignity” as an Interpretive Theme, as Opposed to “Human Life” Alone — Finally (though I could bring up other issues…) I would like to say that “human dignity” offers a more complete interpretative theme when it comes to time to vote. Issues such as health care, boarder control and illegal immigration, social security and social programs, such as welfare, come into play. These too must be considered by any voting Catholic.

Personally, I am pleased that the 2008 election debate is well underway… having started 1.5 years before the election! If gives us all ample opportunity to weigh the arguments, see who is consistent over the long run, and decide who we (perhaps with hesitation) decide to vote for.

I hope it is a long, painful and frustrating process for you all, as (in my opinion) it must be for any Catholic in our American democracy!

—

[1] In a separate tapped interview that the host played during their discussion, Romney is quoted as saying that being “Pro-Life” means that “…I would like to see over time, and as soon as possible, I would like to see Roe v. Wade allow the States to make their own decisions with regard to abortion”.
[2] Discussed having to deal with embryo cloning, etc. as the Governor.
[3] Technically titled “The Church of Jesus Christ of Ladder Day Saints”
[4] I have recently been enthralled with these discussions as found in Pope Benedict’s writings, such as Values in a Time of Upheaval, among others.
[5] The interview is worth listening to for the off air comments alone, especially the last five minutes.
[6] General Handbook of Instructions, 11-4, qtd. in Inside Mormonism—What Mormons Really Believe, by Isaiah Bennett (San Diego: Catholic Answers, 1999), pg. 141 (=IM).
[7] I have always been alarmed when Catholics or other Christians uncritically acclaim that the President is “Pro-Life”. On his official campaign website when running for office, he stated that he believed that abortion was wrong, except in cases of rape and incest, etc. While there are some who feel that I am “majoring in the minors” by pointing out this “nuance”, I would strongly disagree. The “Pro-Life” stance is not simply a banner to wave in front of the “Religious Right” of America—it is an uncompromisingly consistent believe that human life begins at conception and, as a human, the unborn child has certain “inalliable rights”. First and foremost of those rights is the “right to life”.
[8] My own emphasis added.
[9] IM, 143-144.
[10] IM, 144.
[11] It should go without say that I am simply reacting to what was said during the course of the interview.
[12] Further, I remind people to question below (without providing my own answer to the question) whether the President could, in all reality, do anything about Roe v. Wade to begin with.

Abortion

Politics

Ressourcement

Previous Post

August 11, 2007

Latin America Refuses to "Choose"

Next Post

August 13, 2007 "We Must Use Our Eyes!"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I took a census that displeased God, resulting in a plague that killed 70,000 men. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Saul Solomon David Joab