On Fred Thompson and making excuses for the Democratic Party

Last updated on: July 26, 2007 at 1:12 pm by voxnovablog

On Fred Thompson and making excuses for the Democratic Party 2007-07-26T13:12:00-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In a post below, Morning’s Minion equates Fred Thompson’s lobbying efforts to help “rescind a rule prohibiting abortion counseling at federally funded clinics” to “a nameless Democratic politician supported rescinding the aforementioned rule in the legislature,” and then asks: “Is there much difference between this person and Thompson on these moral grounds?” MM thinks not, but I respectfully disagree.

First, let’s examine the facts. Fred Thompson did the lobbying work in question in the early 1990s. But since that time, Thompson’s views on abortion have obviously evolved a great deal. Indeed, during his time in the Senate, Thompson’s record on ‘Culture of Life” issues was exemplary. And unlike other presidential candidates, Thompson’s evolution on the abortion took place when he was not even contemplating a run for the presidency.

Second, the notion that Thompson’s past lobbying efforts forever define him on the issue of abortion is patently ridiculous. What matters are the policy positions a person holds, and whether the voters find those views credible. But even if one questions Thompson sincerity on the issue of abortion, that is a far cry from the democrats seeking the presidency, all of whom proudly support abortion on demand. Indeed, the Democratic Party is so tied to the proabortion lobby that it cannot even bring itself to condemn partial-birth abortion, which the late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan accurately described as “infanticide.”

It seems to me that there is a great deal of effort being made by some folks on this blog, and elsewhere, to convince their fellow Catholics that because the Republican Party is often less than perfect (or ineffective) on abortion and other “Culture of Life” issues this somehow provides “proportionate reasons” to vote for proabortion democrats. One of the central arguments these folks make is that just because you vote for a person who holds proabortion views does not mean that you are necessarily supporting any subsequent proabortion legislation that person ultimately votes to enact. And while that may in fact be true, I find it hard to believe that anyone who takes seriously the Church’s non-negotiable teaching on the evil that is abortion could possibly consider voting for a candidate who is clearly in the pocket of the proabortion lobby (like say all of the dems running for president). As I explained to a gentleman in a recent email exchange:

I understand that many faithful Catholics find it beyond distasteful to vote for Republicans. In fact, as someone who has been active in Republican politics for some time now, I often find it distasteful myself. But it seems to me beyond debate that the GOP is far better on “life issues” than the dems, where there is no room for dissent (e.g. abortion). The same can not be said with regard to much of the Church’s more “progressive” social-justice teachings on poverty, labor rights, etc., where there is a great deal of room for debate on the best means of achieving the goals/aspirations/teachings of the Church. Or even war, where different folks can come to different conclusions about what constitutes a “just war.”

I am also not convinced with the “voting for the candidate and not the law” distinction you are making. The bottom line is that candidates who are elected ultimately do vote in favor or against laws, and if a faithful Catholic knows in advance that the person he/she is voting for will almost certainly vote in a way that is in direct contravention of fundamental Church teaching, I think it is the height of folly to believe that there won’t be moral implications for such an act. That voter may not be intending evil, but he/she is certainly acting with little regard as to whether it will happen, and that’s not something I would want to account for before a holy and righteous God one day. It is for this reason that I abandoned the “how to define torture” debate, and just decided that if an act even comes close to constituting torture, I want no part of supporting it . . . .

Now, none of is this is to say that the GOP is the “party of God,” or that it is impossible for a faithful Catholic to ever vote for a democrat. Indeed, one of the main reasons the democrats regained control of Congress was as a result of running pro-life candidates for office. And as someone who has voted for GOP candidates most of his life, I consider this to be a welcomed political development. Indeed, I would love nothing more than for both parties to show an equal amount of respect for those who hold “Culture of Life” views, and for these issues to be completely taken off the table by the democrats rejecting their collective “Culture of Death” mentality. But to date, the leadership of the Democratic Party has made it clear where its allegiance lies, and it is clearly with the proabortion lobby. And while some believe that the five non-negotiables identified by Catholic Answers during this past presidential election are in fact negotiable, I would like to go on record as dissenting from that viewpoint. If a Catholic votes for a proabortion candidate when there is a clear pro-life alternative, knowing that the candidate will almost certainly support “Culture of Death” legislation, then there are no “proportionate reasons” that would justify voting for that individual. The bottom line is that some issues really are of far greater importance than others, and the notion that a Catholic can vote for a radically proabortion candidate simply because of his solid environmental track record is absurd. I would caution Catholics who are even thinking of voting for such an individual, be it Hillary Clinton or Rudy Giuliani, to take their obligation to support a “Culture of Life” seriously, and to reject any suggestion that it is ever acceptable to vote for a pro-death candidate when there is a pro-life alternative.

One other point: The political backstory behind the effort to justify voting for proabortion democrats is, of course, the success Republicans achieved in the last presidential election cycle, with George Bush winning the Catholic vote over the “Catholic” democratic candidate, John Kerry. This is why there is a mad rush by some to manufacture “proportionate reasons” that would allow Catholics, who would otherwise vote for the Democratic Party, to return to their “natural” political home. Fwiw, I don’t think this will happen any time soon unless the GOP is foolish enough to nominate Rudy Giuliani.

Previous Post

July 26, 2007

Chris Hedges at Adbusters

Next Post

July 26, 2007 On Voting and Making Excuses for the Republican Party

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for using the term "General Conference"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptists Presbyterians Lutherans Seventh-day Adventists