Motu proprio and Selective Reading

Last updated on: July 6, 2007 at 9:54 pm by Policraticus

Motu proprio and Selective Reading 2007-07-06T21:54:00-05:00 Policraticus

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have a few scattered thoughts on the Liturgy that I’d like to convey in two posts this evening, mostly engendered out of my anticipation of Pope Benedict XVI’s motu proprio Summorum Pontificum.

Selective Reading?

I am frustrated. And what follows is my opinion, and my opinion alone.

This motu proprio has created quite a stir in the Catholic blogosphere, which I suppose is a good thing. No doubt, many will be eager to read this new document from Pope Benedict XVI due to its content and implications. But I cannot help but wonder if many of us who are papal loyalists are selective readers. I mean, many of us claim to think with Benedict XVI, yet few of us exhibit any indication that we actually read the works he produces. This is to say that it is not apparent to me that very many prominent Catholic bloggers have any real familiarity with the Pope’s socio-political perspectives beyond what they read in distilled Catholic news articles (reading books does take away precious time from blogging!).

I recall back in April 2005 when Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger was elected to the papacy. There was palpable excitement stemming from self-described “conservative” circles in the Church. The liturgy and doctrine were anticipated to undergo major overhauls. This pope, we were told, will crack down on theological dissidents and liturgical knaves. Even many of those who do not consider themselves “conservative” theologically were initially concerned, but for other reasons. The Vatican’s court theologian and academician ascends to the papal throne to iron out theology and prune the abuses of the Liturgy.

But then something happened. Pope Benedict XVI got, well…political.

First, a few scattered books of essays appeared that were still on the presses either just before or during the time when Ratzinger became Benedict: Truth and Tolerance, Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures, Values in a Time of Upheaval. Social commentary, political analysis, moral evaluation of law–all under the unflinching eye of the Christian tradition. Pope Benedict XVI had already given a taste of what his papacy would most directly address. Regrettably, yet perhaps not surprisingly, I have seen very little attention given to any of these books in the blogosphere.

Second, the Pope’s first encyclical comes out. In our contemporary times, the inaugural encyclical typically sets up a sort of programmatic for the pontificate. Thus came Deus Caritas Est, which reaffirmed the primacy of the Christian conception of caritas before the construction of a unique and extraordinary social vision that explicitly engages the remainders of Marxism and the ubiquity of the capitalist ethic in the West today. The blogs where furiously preparing the reception of this great encyclical, and then…very little. But what did stick out from what little respectable coverage this encyclical received on Catholic blogs was how easily the radicality of the social message of Benedict XVI was downplayed, almost passed off as a sort of neo-liberalism much in the same fashion as Fr. Neuhaus shamelessly did with John Paul II’s great social encyclical, Centesimus Annus.

Third, the Pope publishes a project dear to his heart: an extended meditation on the person of Christ entitled Jesus of Nazareth. With the exception of very few bloggers, this book has not been discussed widely (Chris Blosser found a hand-full of bloggers who touched on the book, but only about three actually went into any detail). But the majority of Catholic bloggers who did address the work tended only to emphasize some stringent critique of biblical exegesis of the 20th century. This critique, of course, is not to be found in the work itself, which makes me question whether these bloggers actually read the small 14-page section where Benedict XVI takes a scant inventory of scholarly portrayals of the biblical Jesus (what about the other 350+ pages???) where he is both critical and appreciative of modern methods of biblical exegesis. Jesus of Nazareth is much in keeping with Deus Caritas Est where Benedict XVI does not content himself with rehashing those sentimental or narcissistic elements of the Catholic faith often made famous by TAN publications. Rather, Benedict XVI draws out many social and political ramifications of the Christ event. But, of course, these ramifications were largely ignored.

Fourth, an English translation of Benedict XVI’s 2004 work, Europe: Today and Tomorrow, came out in the Anglophone world alongside Jesus of Nazareth. This book completed a sort of “trilogy” of Benedict’s socio-political takes on Europe and the West, following Turning Point for Europe? and Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures. And the word from the blogosphere…[chirp, chirp]

And yet, this motu proprio, set to be published in less than 24 hours, will no doubt occupy Catholic blog-land for sometime to come, and rightly so. But why are Catholic bloggers in general, and the bigger blogs in particular, so silent on the truest concerns of Pope Benedict XVI? Selective reading is a disservice to the individual who wants to fully grasp the mind of a major thinker. With the modern day phenomenon of rapidly disseminated information on the internet, should we not expect some of the more popular and prominent blogs to be more intellectually honest? Is it wrong for me to hold them to this standard due to their popularity and influence? Perhaps some of them have fallen prey to a virulent strain of media-ism. In the words of Pope Benedict XVI on the effect of the media on many people: “One has the impression that one knows everything and can pass judgment on everything. But his could mean the loss of the ability to perceive the deeper dimensions of existence.” Does not this diagnosis characterize many sectors of the Catholic blogosphere that rely too heavily on news reports for their information on Catholicism today?

One of the reasons we started this blog was to fill this gaping void in the Catholic blogosphere. Whether we get 100 or 10,000 visitors a day, I hope we do not deviate from our task by commercializing ourselves in order to make money or spending our entire day searching for news articles to regurgitate while neglecting the riches of Catholic literature and especially the dazzling works of Benedict XVI.

No, I do not think this blog is in any way “better” than other Catholic blogs. But I do detect a willingness among its contributors and its readers to really think with ideas, to affect society positively, and to read the works of this Pope! There are some blogs that perhaps do a better job than this one. But one thing you will find here is intellectual honesty, even if we are actually wrong, and no short-changing our readers with mini blog-bites that amount to nothing more than insular gut-reaction.

Quite often, when we have relayed Pope John Paul II’s and Pope Benedict XVI’s social ideas, we’ve been collectively labelled as “liberal.” But given the dearth of responsible and informed commentary on the social ideas of the past two popes in the blogosphere, perhaps due to neglect of their most important books, is it any wonder why many other bloggers look at Vox Nova as “left-leaning”? It is a very said situation when otherwise well-intending Catholics fail to recognize the wisdom of their own leader. It would be too audacious for me to suggest that Vox Nova can fix this problem alone. Rather, along with many of the blogs we’ve linked to in the sidebar, we’ll continue to be one of the few blogs concerned with discussing the whole Benedict XVI…well, at least as much of him as shows up in print!

Thank you to those bloggers who have taken the time to read Pope Benedict XVI’s works and have shared their knowledge with all of us. I have learned a great deal from you, and I look forward to continuing to do so. And most of all, thanks for illuminating what it means to be a Catholic charged with transforming the secular world from within. After all, that seems to be the programmatic of this current pontificate: reshaping and perfecting society through caritas.

Blogs

Catholic Social Teaching

Liturgy

Policraticus

Pope Benedict XVI

Previous Post

July 6, 2007

Iraq War: the Disproportionate Evils That Just Keep Coming

Next Post

July 7, 2007 Pope Benedict XVI likes the Novus Ordo

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the Roman emperor when Jesus was crucified?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Caligula Tiberius Nero Augustus