NFP: Common Concerns About It

Last updated on: April 19, 2017 at 10:35 pm by voxnovablog

NFP: Common Concerns About It 2017-04-19T22:35:25-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In this section I will address the questions, concerns that I hear most frequently about NFP. *Parts of my answers are taken from my blog and my response on Catholic-Converts.

1. NFP is just Catholic birth control. Call it whatever you want, but the results are still the same: no kids.
I hear this from atheistic feminists (at feministing.com) and from devout Catholics alike so I thought I would address this first. I find this analogy a little confused and here is why. If a person dies in his sleep and another is smothered in his sleep, you have two dead people, but clearly there is a difference in how they died.

First, as we read from Pope John Paul II’s speech, there is an intrinsic difference between contraception and NFP. Contraception changes the very nature of sex, ie, the couple literally becomes closed off to one another and participate in a gnostic form of life, the literal separation of the self, while NFP respects human sexuality.

These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, “every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible” is intrinsically evil . . .(CCC2370)

Second, NFP CAN be abused IF the couple does not prayerfully discern God’s will. “From this it follows that they are not free to act as they choose in the service of transmitting life, as if it were wholly up to them to decide what is the right course to follow. On the contrary, they are bound to ensure that what they do corresponds to the will of God the Creator. The very nature of marriage and its use makes His will clear, while the constant teaching of the Church spells it out(HV 10.)” So, the Church places a MAJOR emphasis on the discernment process, which means couples must educate and pray about their decisions and make sure they are God based.
The Church Herself does not define what “well-grounded reasons” are, mainly because they leave that up to the couple and God. But, from a comment in the combox and from my own blog, I have heard parents of large families complain they hear negative comments about their family size from NFPers. The Church says “Sacred Scripture and the Church’s traditional practice see in large families a sign of God’s blessing and the parents’ generosity (CCC2373).

Third, NFP can be abused if the couple’s intent is self-centered and not God centered, so the burden is placed on the couple to discern God’s will in their decisions.

2.)Why is it that NFP limits sex to that time of a woman’s cycle when she is, biological speaking, least inclined to want to have sex?
I would say first, NFP can be effectively used to conceive a much wanted child or it can be used to delay a much wanted child. So, I assume from the question the person is delaying a child.
Choosing not to have sex when both want to have sex is difficult. It is for this reason that Pope Paul VI has this to say about NFP:

The honest practice of regulation of birth demands first of all that husband and wife acquire and possess solid convictions concerning the true values of life and of the family, and that they tend towards securing perfect self-mastery. To dominate instinct by means of one’s reason and free will undoubtedly requires ascetical practices, so that the affective manifestations of conjugal life may observe the correct order, in particular with regard to the observance of periodic continence. Yet this discipline which is proper to the purity of married couples, far from harming conjugal love, rather confers on it a higher human value. It demands continual effort yet, thanks to its beneficent influence, husband and wife fully develop their personalities, being enriched with spiritual values. Such discipline bestows upon family life fruits of serenity and peace, and facilitates the solution of other problems; it favors attention for one’s partner, helps both parties to drive out selfishness, the enemy of true love; and deepens their sense of responsibility. (HV 21)

Is it difficult? Yes. But this is exactly why NFP CAN open peoples’ hearts for more children because it is so difficult and spouses rationalize that maybe getting pregnant is not the worst thing to happen. But if the couple does indeed have reasonable reasons to not have kids, then the denial of sex and the self-mastery needed to deny it makes them holier people.

3.)If the real difficulty with birth control is the intent to have sex without conceiving children (instead of, say, the use of technology as opposed to natural means), then why is NFP allowed at all? After all, the ultimate intention (to avoid conception from that particular sexual encounter) seems to be the same?
As Maria stated in the combbox, the issue of birth control and NFP is not one of intent, although NFP can be bad if the couples’ intent is to reject children. The issue with any form of contraception is that it makes sex a lie. It changes the very nature of the sexual act, which from a Christian perspective is supposed to be 100% self-giving to the spouse. It is so integral that the Church says every single sexual act HAS to be honest. And what is honesty? Honesty is not going into a sexual act preparing for war. That’s right. Every time a person uses a barrier between herself and her partner, whether it is a physical barrier or a chemical barrier, and chooses to have sex, he is saying with his words, “I love you and give myself to you” but his body is saying “Except for this part of me.” The Church demands Her people not split body and soul, but rather unify them as God willed them to be unified. Even if you and your partner don’t say its “war” your bodies cannot not lie. You are placing a barrier between yourselves that IS a real barrier.

There is something even more insidious that happens with contraception and that is that sex is divorced from children. By its VERY definition, “CONTRA-CEPTION” is negative. You go and have sex and use something negative. “Against Conception.” Our secular world calls this “protection” or “control.” So a child no longer is a natural, logical outcome, but rather a “thing” to be planned and a “thing” to be ordered. This is so serious the Church calls “Contraception” as a part of “The Culture of Death.” In its 1992 ruling in Casey vs Planned Parenthood, the Supreme Court sounded like the Catholic Church when it said that contraception has changed the very nature of sex. People have sex and don’t want a child. So when a child is conceived, it no longer is a natural, logical product of two loving people, but a thing or a “product of conception” that MUST be destroyed if the parent so chooses.
NFP respects the natural order. It does not divorce sex from children. It does not split the unity of the person. It does not separate spouses and their vows. And ultimately, it honors God as the author of all.

4)A big question for us, however, is what constitutes a serious reason for delaying pregnancy? How serious does the reason have to be?
First off, in the Vatican translation of H.V. the Holy Father uses “serious (changed from reasonable) reasons.” The Church does not define what these reasons are or could be. It does NEED to be said, no one HAS to use NFP. There are many Catholic and non-Catholic families who do not have health issues or whatnot and they choose to let God worry about the details. This is perfectly acceptable and even encouraged by the Church, as the quote from Question 1 shows.

The Church does say that since marriage is a Sacrament, and since the spouses form a 3 way community–husband,wife,God–the spouses are supposed to pray over their needs and wants within marriage. I guess I feel that if people are wanting to please God, they will do what is right within their marriage. And the good news is, unlike most contraceptions, spousal decisions can be changed from one month to the next. This is not a one time fixed decision, like sterilization.

I d0 take great comfort in knowing that the health of both spouses is recognized as important by our Holy Father, 0r external circumstances, whatever that means. The point is the Church teaching is reasonable and respectful of issues that can affect a couple. I know there are many Catholics out there who believe NFP is to be used in very rare circumstances, but my feelings on this if the Holy Father himself did not define what these reasons are, than laity should not become Popes themselves and fill in the blanks. I think the Pope wisely trusted couples to know their own needs and situations.

5)Is one morally obligated to have as many children as one can (i.e., either physically or financially)? I only ask because the community in which I currently find myself has the attitude that if you go so many years (I think they say 3) without having a child, then you’re failing in your marital vocation. This strikes me as extremely odd, as somewhat utilitarian, and as making marriage merely a means to an end rather than an end in itself. What are your thoughts?
First, I find this so offensive and here is why. It is no one’s business outside of your wife, or husband and God on how many kids He gives you. No one.
Second, EVERYONE assumes that if you do not regulate fertility people will have a ton of children. This is just not true. Most Westerners are marrying in their late 20s and early 30s. Age affects fertility. Breastfeeding affects fertility. Diet affects fertility. Obesity affects fertility and 30 some % of Americans are obese.
Third, many couples experience secondary infertility, which means they have a child already, but cannot get pregnant again.
It seems like the people in your community are placing themselves in the position of God and judging families on how many people are produced. There is woman in town here who has one born child. She & her husband have suffered 4 miscarriages since. One lady in their parish constantly tells her “how selfish it is not to have more kids.” What?! The lady obviously does not know about their miscarriages, but is it ANY of her business?
The ? you have, though, is whether we are morally obligated to have as many kids as possible. I would direct you to Pope Paul VI’s response and the Catechism’s response. The couple has to discern God’s will in their marriage. Some people may never have children because they are infertile. Others may only be given a few children, while others are called to have large families. I think it is important that the Pope recognizes, too, the psychological conditions of the spouses. I suffered from post-partum depression, like MANY women, after my first child. This makes me very nervous if I should have more kids again. I think of Andrea Yates. She clearly suffered from severe post partum psychosis with her earlier pregnancies. Every couple has their own issues, hence the reason Pope Paul VI did not offer a checklist for spouses.

I hope this helps. If you are not satisfied with the responses, feel free to comment.
**Note: A commenter feels that I have not properly characterized HV. He

Catholic Social Teaching

Previous Post

June 9, 2007

The Lesson of Franz Jägerstätter

Next Post

June 9, 2007 Is THAT Your Only Comment?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, how many lampstands does John see?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Twelve lampstands Ten lampstands Four lampstands Seven golden lampstands