Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Global Warming: Not a Partisan Issue (Part 1)

Global Warming: Not a Partisan Issue (Part 1)

Last updated on: June 7, 2007 at 2:24 pm by voxnovablog

Global Warming: Not a Partisan Issue (Part 1) 2007-06-07T14:24:00-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Too much hype has been going on around the media and the Catholic blogosphere in regards to global warming. The potential effect of increased human activity on climate change carries many consequences that quickly turn this issue into a political one. One of the main ramifications is the possible increased regulation of fossil fuel production and consumption, which for a carbon-based global economy, can heavily affect economic activities as we know them today.

As Catholics, we cannot fall into political partisanship, but fulfill our divine responsibility in protecting the environment. Sadly, we have seen the former in main Catholic blogs, rather than an informed approach and a genuine interest in the issue. The starting point for all of us in this issue is to understand what is global warming, its potential causes, and a path forward. This is what I attempt to include in this post, which will be divided in two parts: the first will deal with the basics of the earth’s energy balance and the greenhouse effect and the second will touch on the results of the latest study published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Disclaimer

As a Chemical Engineer, I had to take several courses on chemistry, kinetics, thermodynamics, mass transfer, and organic and physical chemistry, so I know a thing or two about these things. I will touch mainly on energy balances on this post, which I happen to deal with every day in my job responsibilities. However, I’m not a metereologist or a climatologist and they are the ones who have the final word. Hence, I will talk about their data and conclusions on my second post. What I present here and on this post are not my personal views, but I would still encourage you to do your own study and read reliable scientific sources on the topic that do not have any political affiliation and that deal with the different positions on global warming.

Put Al Gore aside

We have written much about the Holy See’s position on global warming (here and here) and the Nuncio’s call to Catholics to take personal responsibility in this issue by working less, spending less, and wanting less. Firstly, let us learn the mechanics of the earth’s heat balance and then let us dig into the available data and determine whether human activity is a direct cause of global warming. In order to begin the discussion, let us forget about Al Gore for a second. We have mentioned how Christian truths contained in Catholic teaching, and in this case, the concern of caring for God’s creation, can be found in ideals of the liberal wing just as they can be found in the conservative wing. As a result, we should not start talking about what Gore “thinks,” but what the challenge of global warming represents for us as Christians.

Thermodynamics 101

Before we start talking about how greenhouse gases trap heat and, in return, heat the Earth, let us talk about energy balances. As we were taught to memorize in Engineering, the first law of thermodynamics states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but only transformed. What does that mean? Basically, it means that energy simply does not disappear into thin air—it is transformed. For instance, when you run for a mile, you will sweat and emit body heat. You are not creating that energy (heat), but transforming the energy stored in your body in the form of nutrients (calories) into motion (mechanical energy), and then into heat, which finally is released into the atmosphere. Of course this is a small contribution of energy, but for our purposes, just understand that the energy goes somewhere to be transformed into another form of energy–it does not just disappear.

Think of a large concert hall where you are by yourself, because you got there early to watch the show. The air conditioner in the hall is set at 70 deg F and it turns on and off in order to maintain that temperature and right now you are feeling quite comfortable. Minutes later, more people start to come in and before you even know, the hall is filled with over a thousand people. The air conditioner is still set at 70 deg F, but now you need to take the concert brochure out and turn it into a fan, because you are getting a bit hot. What is happening in this hypothetical situation is that the air conditioner is now turning on more often in order to keep the temperature down, due to the increased body heat emitted from the increased number of people. It feels hot now, because the A/C has a limited capacity (in BTUs) that can “remove” the energy (heat). Therefore, if a thousand more people enter the concert hall, you will feel even more uncomfortable, because the air conditioner capacity is not large enough to keep up with the increased generation of energy in the hall even if it remains on the entire time. Hopefully, if the engineers of the concert hall did their job correctly, they designed the air conditioner big enough to handle the maximum capacity of people in the hall.

The Earth’s Energy Balance

Similar analogy of the concert hall and the air conditioner applies to the earth. Think of the the atmosphere as the air conditioner and the concert hall as the surface of the earth. However, the atmosphere, different from the air conditioner, does not release cool air, but filters radiation from the sun instead, preventing the earth’s surface from getting too warm.

The earth has a natural energy balance that allows life to exist. We know now from history that whenever that energy balance is affected in any way, the earth surface cools or warms up, which has led to ice ages, for instance, and explains why certain species have disappeared, such as the dinosaurs. The controversy around global warming is that in the past this energy balance has been affected by natural elements and that the subtle warming the earth is experiencing now may be affected by an unprecedented new element: human activity.

Similar questions arise as with the air conditioner and concert hall example. In theoretical terms and for the sake of the analogy with the given example, we can ask: Is the atmosphere designed with enough “capacity” to handle the increase in energy generated by natural processes and human activity?

What is the “greenhouse effect”?

The surface temperature of the sun has been estimated to be anywhere from 5600-6000 deg C (10,000-11,000 deg F). Think of those pictures you used to see in your grade school textbooks of the sun sending radiation to the Earth. If you still have any doubts of how hot radiation from the sun can be, stand out in the sun in the summer time at noon for about an hour somewhere in the Gulf coast or if you can make it to the Equator, even better. In any case, thanks to the atmospheric layers, the surface of the Earth does not see extremely high temperatures radiating from the sun even if sometimes it feels like it is 200 deg F outside! Think of the atmosphere as a filter, or even a shield. The atmosphere reflects some of that radiation coming from the sun back to space, but the rest of it is absorbed in the atmosphere or makes it through to the surface of the earth. Just as we mentioned that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, but transformed, natural processes on the surface of the earth (e.g. water vapor from oceans or other bodies of water) generate heat that rises to the atmosphere. On this second step, the atmosphere does the same thing than with the radiation coming from the sun: it lets some portion of the radiation pass through into space and the rest is absorbed by the atmosphere. Let us recapitulate:

1. Radiation comes from the sun to the earth.
2. The earth’s atmospheric layers reflect some of the heat coming from the sun into space and the rest goes through to the earth surface.
3. Natural infrared radiation generated on the earth’s surface rises to the atmosphere.
4. This radiation either passes through the atmospheric layers into space or is absorbed.

Now our attention turns to that infrared radiation coming from the Earth that is trapped in the atmosphere. Keep in mind, that this is a natural process and that this infrared radiation is a normal part of the earth’s thermodynamic balance. That same trapped heat in the atmosphere warms up the gas molecules which in turn, release heat back to the earth—these gases are called “greenhouse gases.”

What are greenhouse gases?

The atmosphere is made up of a combination of gases: 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and the remaining 1% is composed of carbon dioxide, methane, hydrogen, and inert gases such as argon, neon, helium, and neon. The extent to which certain gas molecules alter the balance of incoming and outgoing energy between the Earth and the atmosphere is called Radiative Forcing. The gases that have a greater positive radiative forcing tend to warm the Earth’s surface, whereas those gases with a negative radiative forcing tend to cool the earth’s surface. Of the gases that make up the atmosphere, carbon dioxide has the highest radiative forcing, which means that it tends to warm the surface of the earth the most.

There are three major greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), water vapor (H2O), and nitrous oxide (NO2). If you remember your chemistry and biology correctly, you will know that these gases occur naturally on the earth and are even byproducts of natural processes such as combustion, photosynthesis, fermentation, and more. What is the big deal then around greenhouse gases? The issue at hand is that we are seeing concentration levels of these gases in the atmosphere—especially carbon dioxide—in unprecedented levels and scientists believe that this is due to increased human activity, because of its exponential increase in post-Industrial times (see Figure from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).

For Christians around the world, the question becomes: if we are seeing that concentration levels of CO2 have increased dramatically since the Industrial Revolution and we are being told by scientists that this can cause an increased heat release to the earth… do we sit and say that this is all a myth constructed by the far Left? Or do we attempt to understand the problem at hand and do something about it?

On Part 2:
– Conclusions from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Catholic Social Teaching

Previous Post

June 7, 2007

Marriage - contract or sacrament?

Next Post

June 7, 2007 Should Catholics Follow The Utopian Vision of Modern Democracies? Part III-1 Some Reflections on the Founding Fathers of America

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Ahab's wicked wife, notorious for her cruelty?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Athaliah Michal Abigail Jezebel