Human Dignity and Life Matters

Last updated on: May 23, 2007 at 8:48 am by voxnovablog

Human Dignity and Life Matters 2007-05-23T08:48:00-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As a Catholic, I stand for the affirmation of life, and that means all life; I affirm the dignity of each human person, given to them at the point of their conception; it is a dignity which never ends, not even at the point of death. Indeed, many people seem to forget this – human dignity extends into eternity; just as it is easy for many to disregard human dignity at the point of conception, it seems even easier to disregard human dignity after death. After all, the person is no longer alive, what does it matter now? Such a position, however, implies a rather nihilistic understanding of the world, because it seems to accept that there is some sort of personal annihilation once one reaches the point of death. As a Catholic, I cannot and will not agree; we pray for the souls of the dead and we pray with the communion of the saints; death is not the end, but only a beginning.

This is not to say death is a good thing; it is a point of personal discord, a disruption of one’s proper sense of being (we are called to be incarnate; human personality reaches its fulfillment in the flesh, not separated from it). In death, while human dignity continues, certainly there is a victory of sorts (however temporary) for the forces which contend against such dignity. Each death represents a continuation of the fall; each death represents the assault of Satan against heaven; each death represents the attempt of Satan to destroy God, because in the death of each human person, another example, another person made in the image and likeness of God, has been obliterated from the face of the earth. Death is the greatest force and tool of the devil.

“By death he conquered death, and to those in the tombs, he granted life.”

Indeed, death, the greatest force against God, founds its end – in the death of God incarnate, in the death of Jesus. In his death, the purpose of death has been met – death, aimed at wiping out the image and likeness of God, aimed at deicide, finds its purpose fulfilled. Death met the Lord of life, and killed him; but the victory was hollow, for in his acceptance of death, Jesus, God, brings about the final end of death.

Death has been met by the God of life, and it has been overcome. However, its legacy continues. The victory is in eternity; its legacy is in time. As temporal beings, we encounter it here, on this side of eternity, where it continues to represent the Satanic attack against God and the dignity of life. In this encounter, we must continue to represent the force of life, the force of human dignity; we must not accept the culture of death in any of its manifestations.

Sadly, this is easier said than done. Rare is the individual not influenced, in some fashion, by the powers of death. Indeed, we see death before us; we know we must encounter the fullness of its strength, and succumb to its pull. We will die; it is something we cannot prevent. This fact, however, brings with it a siren cry: “If we will all die one day, what does it matter when? What does it matter in how we die? What does it matter if this person dies today instead of next year? The end is just the same?” Of course, the end is not the same, because in the extra years of life, in the extra years of developing the fullness of our human personality, we are free to manifest more of the image and likeness of God within us.

The siren, however, still calls out to us; it often manipulates us, and chooses our battles for us. The culture of death might give a small battle for us to fight, one which we can win, but they do so to divert our attention. The leaders of the pro-life movement, I feel, have often been manipulated in this fashion. Let us look at one such battle, and question the implications of the pro-life victory to see if it really is the victory the pro-life movement thinks it is.

One of the great horrors in our age is the so-called “partial-birth abortion.” No one who is sane can look at it and believe it is anything but a monstrous act performed upon a baby. It should never be allowed to be, and with that, I agree with the pro-life movement. However, for years, it seems to be the major thrust of the pro-life movement’s political debates and battles have been to stop “partial-birth abortion.” Again, I agree it must be stopped, but I do not think the implications of this battle and how it has been waged has been properly understood. The pro-life movement, by focusing upon the fact that the baby is more or less, already born, has given great political weight and victory to the forces of death. How is this so? Because they base their arguments upon the logic of those who support abortion: they say, with those who support abortion, birth has a fundamental effect on the dignity of the human person. The focus on the baby being more or less born implies an acceptance that there is something different about killing a person after they are born than before they are born. By creating laws against “partial-birth abortion,” this difference is then further established in the legal system, and put in place, not by those who support abortion, but by those who oppose it.

The leaders of the pro-life movement lack the wisdom needed to actually challenge the culture of death. They have, for the most part, sold themselves to that same culture: they accept its principles, and argue within them. What I said above about “partial-birth abortion” can be said about many other issues. In part, the problem lies with the politicization of life; the leaders of the pro-life movement often imply the solution can only be political. While it is true there is the need for a political aspect to the movement, the focus on politics itself diverts the attention of the pro-life movement. Many involved with the pro-life cause think all they need to do is vote for the right politicians and they have done their part! Of course, when it is shown no politician really represents the fullness of the pro-life cause, they find it is possible to excuse this inconsistency from the politicians. Do they not realize the politicians see this? The politicians realize the lip-service given to the pro-life movement by many of its followers, and so they do the same: give lip service during campaigns, but then after elected, only give as much back to the movement as the people themselves put in. For the politician, it becomes a nice way to get votes; for the voter, it is a nice way to feel they satisfy their conscience; but neither, it seems, really understands the value of life, and until the voter moves beyond the political spectrum and into the world at large, this is where things will remain.

Previous Post

May 22, 2007

Sterile Nation, Sterile Hearts

Next Post

May 23, 2007 Karol Wojtyła (John Paul II) on Self-Giving

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many chapters are in the book of Romans?

Select your answer to see how you score.

18 16 12 21