Does the Church Change Its Social Doctrine?

Last updated on: May 21, 2007 at 7:21 pm by voxnovablog

Does the Church Change Its Social Doctrine? 2007-05-21T19:21:00-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Lately, there has been considerable misunderstanding and debate about Catholic social doctrine. Perhaps the greatest cause of confusion is the fact that many people misunderstand its application and particular use as representing some sort of universal, acceptable norm. For example, many Catholics rightfully point out that in certain times and places, the Church found it possible to accept the use of the death penalty; however, because of this, many Catholics think this is a universal approval of the death penalty. They are confused when Popes speak out against the death penalty, and the response we see from them demonstrates this confusion: “The Church once approved the death penalty; now it speaks out against the death penalty. The Church’s teaching has changed. Throughout most of Church history, the death penalty has been approved; now it is not. Therefore, we see the Church’s current practice is different from what it has said in tradition. Why is this so? Why can’t I just follow tradition? And isn’t it true that I can disagree with the Pope? It is clear, he is offering his private interpretation here, an interpretation I disagree with and goes against Catholic tradition.”

One of the central problems in this line of argument is, as was said above, from the fact that they turn a particular into a universal. They do not understand the actual universal rule which the Church rightfully appropriates according to the needs and abilities of the age it finds itself in.

What do I mean by this? Let us once again look at the question of the death penalty. Fundamentally, we find the Church says it is wrong to take human life – any human life. Indeed, life is sacred, and we must recognize and respect the dignity of all human persons. Taking a life is always an evil, and we must avoid evil at all costs. However, there are other evils we must consider. The welfare of society and the people living within it is what government is for; and a government must be free to exercise itself according to this objective. It must do so in justice, bringing the most just society it can produce. However, the ability of a government to bring about this justice and to preserve the good peace of society differs at differing times and places. When it has its hands tied, with only a few means to halt the actions of a person in a murderous rampage, it must use what means it has to protect the greater good of society, and this sometimes can mean the use of capital punishment. This does not mean capital punishment should be seen as a good in such a situation; rather, it is the reverse, it is a necessity and its use must be seen, not as a time of joy, but a time of sorrow. However, when it can halt the murderous rampage of criminals in other, non-violent means, then the use of capital punishment is not a necessity, and therefore, inexcusable.

In a similar fashion to what has been said about the death penalty, we can find that most of Catholic social doctrine must be practiced in various ways, and they will differ from one another according to the time and place they are being practiced. Moreover, as with all truth, our understanding of Catholic social doctrine continues to be improved; when more of these particular situations are encountered, they require us to elaborate the universal principles which guide our activity. Because our understanding will become greater over time, this will also require a greater, more precise application of those principles.

Pope Benedict expresses this idea beautifully in Jesus of Nazareth. Before Christ, the Torah was understood by the Jews as being their universal moral guide. In this, they were correct. However, they did not understand the proper use of the Torah. Jesus declared nothing new; he did not come to do away with the law and the prophets, but to “fulfill them.” But his fulfillment was to show the proper universal norm by which the Torah should be understood. Indeed, this law was to be the rule of love. Moreover, this rule of love is best understood and explained by our relationship with a person, that is, Jesus , because he is is truth incarnate. (cf. Pope Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth. Trans. Adrian J. Walker. New York: Doubleday, 2007; p.114).

Just as we find many now misunderstanding particular manifestations of the universal rule as a universal rule, we find this was also the case in the ancient world. The Pope points out that the Torah itself contained both casuistic laws (which were legal arrangements dealing with very particular cases), and apodictic laws, or “metanorms” which are the universals we are looking for (ibid, 123-125). One of the problems we find behind the legalistic application of the Torah was the fact that the two categories were often confused and believed to be as if they were one and the same.

In the fashion that Jesus was able to show the universal laws behind the casuistic laws of the Torah, so now we find Catholic social teaching is working to find the apodictic laws behind the living practice of the Catholic faith over the last two thousand years. This means Catholic social teaching is indeed changing, not in essence, but in our understanding of it. Thus, as the Pope says:

Jesus stands before us neither as a rebel nor as a liberal, but as the prophetic interpreter of the Torah. He does not abolish it, but he fulfills it, and he does so precisely by assigning reason its sphere of responsibility for acting within history. Consequently, Christianity constantly has to reshape and reformulate social structures and ‘Christian social teaching.’ There will always be new developments to correct what has gone before. In the inner structure of the Torah, in its further development under the critique of the Prophets, and in Jesus’ message, which takes up both elements, Christianity finds the wide scope of necessary historical evolution as well as the solid ground that guarantees the dignity of many by rooting it in the dignity of God. (ibid., 126– 27).

The Church teaches and proclaims its message in all times, but it does so according to the needs and abilities of the people living in those times. Its core is one and the same, but its way of addressing and incarnating that core differs from age to age; its social teaching must be understood as a practice of skillful means, of upaya. Its core does not change, but people must, in wisdom, discern what that core is; then they will not confuse its particular application as being what it is in fact. Then they will understand why its central core is founded upon the law of love, and why St Augustine said, “Love, and do as thou wilt.”

Catholic Social Teaching

Death Penalty

Henry Karlson

Previous Post

May 21, 2007

New Address: www.www.patheos.com/blogs/voxnova

Next Post

May 22, 2007 World Digest

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the sign God gave to Noah as a promise to never flood the earth again?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fire Dove Rainbow Lightning