Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
The Making of the Modern Social Mind

The Making of the Modern Social Mind

Last updated on: May 17, 2007 at 6:19 pm by voxnovablog

The Making of the Modern Social Mind 2007-05-17T18:19:00-05:00 voxnovablog

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I love teaching humanities classes at a local college here in Texas. This semester, In addition to our departmentally mandated text book, I assigned Sophocles’ Theban Plays, Plato’s Euthyphro, Crito, Meno and Phaedrus, and Boethius’ Consolation of Philosophy. In the past, I have assigned Plato’s Symposium, Anselm’s Proslogion and selections from Thomas Aquinas’ opera. In short, I try to complement our historical survey, which covers prehistory to the fourteenth century, with primary sources penned during the very era we are studying. I assign works that I feel ought to be read by anyone who wants to claim any real familiarity with the history of Western civilization (I lecture briefly on the Presocratics, Aristotle, Augustine, the Victorines, Abelard and Suger).

What strikes me is how very foreign so many of the basic concepts found in these texts are to my students–concepts such as fate, providence, communalism, being and the synergy between religion and government. This is not due to any shortcomings on the part of my students (when I entered college, I, too, was adrift in these waters), but due to the intellectual revolution of modernity which played itself out not only in science, political theory and religion, but also in living societies themselves. In short, ideas–even the most esoteric–affect the workings of the world.

What my students provide me with is the insight that the modern world, which in itself is no monolith, is markedly different than that of the ancient and medieval periods. It seems that the natural orientation of attitude toward the world, that is, our daily, unadulterated worldview, is largely a product of modernity, albeit not exclusively so. Even those of us who study the history of ideas must modify, as it were, the orientation of our thinking in order to grasp at the concepts and living order of “pre-modern” life in Western society.

At this point, I am fully aware of my post’s susceptibility to postmodernism’s “incredulity toward meta-narratives,” but nevertheless I press on.

What is this modern mindset that has conditioned our contemporary world? All I can do at this point is to sketch an historical picture of the questions, inquiries and findings that provided the shift (not a break!) in thinking. I leave it to you to fill in the gaps that I will inevitably leave.

Watershed moments
We can, perhaps, list four historical moments that remapped the intellectual and culture landscape cultivated during the medieval period:

1. The (re)discovery of ancient Greek and Roman texts
2. The invention of the printing press
3. Martin Luther’s challenge to Catholic ecclesial authority
4. The fissure between Church and state

These four moments were successive and related, though I hesitate to declare them causally so. But if we are to isolate a sort of cause of the modern mind, perhaps we can find no better candidate than the discovery of original Greek and Latin texts.

During the high Middle Ages, many ancient texts were acquired through relations with Muslim intellectuals who possessed several Arabic translations of Plato, Aristotle and the neo-Platonists (to name only a few). While there were some Greek manuscripts extant, the transmission of the bulk of the Aristotelian and neo-Platonic corpora was transmitted to the Latin West via Arabic sources. By the close of the 14th century, original Greek and Latin manuscripts were discovered, prompting many scholars to immerse themselves in the classical languages (medieval Latin and ancient Latin differed greatly in terms of structure, vocabulary, idiom and pronunciation). The invention of the printing press would eventually make these manuscripts more widely available outside centers of learning and research, extending education and study beyond the monastery and medieval university walls and into the hands of the individual.

The discovery spawned much excitement among the European elite, which eventually developed into an intellectual trend, so to speak. One of the chief characteristics of the Renaissance was the idea that a recovery of the styles of the ancients would prompt a rebirth of the classical age that would bring about ideal social and intellectual conditions. If the “Middles Ages” could be by-passed, it was thought, the two eras which flanked them could somehow merge conceptually and, less likely, practically. When one considers this paradigm of thought, it is no surprise that a young Martin Luther, caught up in this naive Zeitgeist, would call for a return to some ancient, more primitive style of Christianity in opposition to what he perceived to be the ossification of faith and the tyrannical jurisdiction within the medieval Church. Of course, the caricatures of early Graeco-Roman life constructed by Renaissance scholars and the caricatures of apostolic Christianity constructed by the Protestant Reformers would be exposed and dashed by the historico-critical studies of 19th century German historians.

By the time of Descartes, a more sober view of classical learning emerged. It was no longer thought possible to somehow resurrect the intellectual and social life of antiquity. However, what did seem possible was not so much a recovery as an emulation of the manner in which the ancients thought. That is, one could philosophize just as the great Plato and Aristotle had. This would, of course, entail jettisoning the theological and philosophical legacy forged by the likes of the Cappadocians, Augustine, Boethius, Anselm, Aquinas, Bonaventure, Scotus, and even Ockham. By cleaning the intellectual slate, so to speak, it was thought that one could perhaps mimic the style of a Plato or an Aristotle without entertaining some romantic notion that life in modern Europe could somehow embody life in ancient Greece, Macedonia, Carthage or Rome. Likewise, any outside authority such as the Church or society was held in suspicion, for they risked contaminating and obscuring the individual’s pursuit of truth.

Intellectual trends
What emerged in intellectual circles was a concentration on the re-creating, re-imaging, re-imagining and re-constituting of the world through the efforts of the individual. Three general characteristics of this worldview or thought-form are:

1. I know with relative adequacy that there is an external world “outside” me, but I know with absolute certainty that the self (i.e. that “I”) exists. All knowledge, therefore, will proceed from this certainty of myself or at least accompany this certainty.

2. When I talk and make judgments about the world, I make no reference to the world apart from my own ideas, taxonomies, (meta-)narratives and perceptions of the world. It is not that the world simply exists, it’s that I understand the world to exist according to my own understanding.

3. The narrative history of humanity is a chronicle of self-interested, autonomous individuals interacting with one another and resolving conflict.

The attempt to re-connect this new concept of “individual”, which is not coextensive with the concept of “person” (which also includes social reality), results in socio-political models that ultimately aim to serve the individual(s) rather than the person(s) or the whole community. It is no surprise that this individualism, divorced from both community and Church, bred such phenomena as free market capitalism, utilitarianism, secularism, and religious non-denominationalism. Indeed, how can any of these phenomena survive without their underlying and unifying foundation in individualism? The response to individualism in politics and economics over-corrected rather than re-directed: communism, the atheist State, collectivism and totalitarianism.

Even Catholics who embrace one or more of these phenomena that spring from Enlightenment individualism cannot help but distort and mutate the fundamental creativity of the human person, morphing a true creativity that is essentially priestly and divine into an illusory creativity that is marked by individual effort at constituting reality in one’s own image. Indeed, I wonder if these same Catholics who posit divine creativity in man as “wealth creativity” have sought the intellectual roots of these phenomena in Calvin, Hobbes, Spinoza, Locke, A. Smith and J.S. Mill, all of whom were without Catholicism as a touchstone. An honest attempt at philosophical and economic genealogy would likely dispel the myths that these phenomena, at their deepest roots, are in any manner or measure commensurable with Catholic faith.

And so when we think of the making of the modern Western mind, we cannot help but characterize it in terms of a theoretical individualism that is awkwardly re-connected/re-inserted into practical communal living. Is it any wonder that our modern (contemporary) ideas of society, religion and economics are so vastly different and foreign from those ideas of Christ and the early/medieval Church? Is it any wonder that many self-described orthodox Catholics equally struggle to break from these inculcated Protestant/modern ideas, confusedly championing individualism in economics and politics on the one hand, and a robust Catholicism on the other?

Pope Benedict, it seems to me, in his two marvelous little volumes, Christianity and the Crisis of Culture and Values in a Time of Upheaval, sketches a sure path out of individualism by raising the Catholic consciousness above the murmurs of individualism disjointedly tied to communion. Unless we are willing to be critical of our own ideas, we shall remain forever circumscribed by them. The unwillingness to criticize presuppositions and recognize contextual influences found in Enlightenment rationality extends into its social and economic heirs (e.g. free market capitalism, utilitariansim). This hesitancy or dogmatism (take your pick) causes many of the adherents to take for granted that the socio-economic constructs of Adam Smith, David Hume or J.S. Mill are the greatest humanity has ever forged or, at least, it are “better” than anything else. This prideful economic rationalism, which uncritically takes for granted the legitimacy of individualism and economic liberalism, refuses to ask from whose vantage point is such an assertion being made. It takes no account of social embeddedness, relying instead on rationalist evaluation of ideas. Worst of all, it is devoid of biblical realism and its sober and chastened view of human nature. As Pope John Paul II wrote in his last book, Memory and Identity: “A certain concept of freedom, which has widespread support in public opinion at present, diverts attention from ethical responsibilities. Appeal is made today to freedom alone. It is often said: what matters is to be free, released from all constraint or limitation, so as to operate according to private judgment, which in reality is often pure caprice. This much is clear: such liberalism can only be described as primitive. Its influence, however, is potentially devastating.”

The common good, which drove the political theologies of the great St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, cannot be eclipsed by the towering and imposing concept of “individual liberties” as if rights or liberties can somehow be bestowed without regard to personal relation within a community. And yet, this is precisely what has occured in the political and economic theories of Western liberalism. When concern for common good is secondary–or even altogether banished from discourse–it matters little whether or not individual liberties are subject to the rule of totalitarianism or liberalism. As Pope John Paul II relayed in the same book, “We must ask how this common treasury of the human race, the treasury of so many different cultures, can be built up over time, and we must ask how best to respect the proper relationship between economics and culture in deference to the overwhelming power of one-sided market forces. It matters little, in fact, whether this kind of tyranny is imposed by Marxist totalitarianism or by Western liberalism.”

The discovery of the “individual” during the 12th century and the assertion of “individual rights” of the 18th century have illumined human nature. However, we must realize that individualism and its remainders in unbridled capitalism and utilitarianism fundamentally lacks a coherent and consistent metaphysics of the human person, which not only skews the social perception of “person” into “individual,” but also dissolves “common good” into a mere limit concept on individualism. What is sorely needed, even among Catholics, is a metaphysics of the person that extends out from reason and faith and into practical action.

Personalism

Philosophy

Policraticus

Previous Post

May 17, 2007

Ten Principles of Catholic Social Doctrine (Part 1 of 2)

Next Post

May 17, 2007 Excommunications on the Fly

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2019 A Consistent Ethic of Life Aaron Weldon Abortion absurdity Abuse Scandal Academics Adoption Advent Africa agreement/disagreement with Church teaching Alexander Schmemann Alexham Alterity America Amnesty International Anarchism angels Anglicanism Animals Annual Statistics Anthony Anxietas Apocalyptic Apophatic Appalachia Aquinas Art Atheism Atonement Augustine Authority Baptism Beauty Bible biblical criticism biblical scholarship Bioethics Bishops Black Catholics Black Theology Blackadder Blogs Books Breastfeeding Brett Salkeld Buddhism Bush administration Byzantine Catholic Calvinism Canada Canon Law Capital Punishment Capitalism Caryll Houselander Catholic Blog Awards Catholic Blogging Catholic League Catholic Social Teaching Catholic Worker Movement Catholicity CFL Charity Children Chris West Christ and Culture Christian Democracy Christian Unity Christmas Christology Church Church Doctrine Church History Climate Change Cohabitation Colbert Collegiality Communion Communism Comparative Theology Competition Conferences conscience conscience rights Consequentialism Consistent Life Ethics Consumerism Contraception Contrition Conversion Converts Coptic COVID-19 Creation Critical Thinking Cross Cuba Culture Culture of Death Culture of Life Darfur David Cruz-Uribe David Wheeler-Reed Death Death Penalty Democracy Demons Desert Fathers Devil Dialogue dignity Disability Disarmament discernment Discipleship discrimination Dissent Distributism Division Doctrine Domestic Church Dorothy Day Double Effect Doubt Down syndrome Driving Early Church Easter Eastern Churches Ecclesiology Economics Economy Ecumenism Education El Salvador Election Election 2020 Ellul Embryonic Stem Cell Research Empire Energy Enlighenment Environmentalism Ephraim Radner Episcopal Church epistemology Equality Eschatology Ethics Eucharist Europe Euthanasia Evangelization Evil Evolution Excommunication F.X. Durrwell Facism Facts Fair Trade Faith Family Fashion Feddie Feminism Feminist theology Fertility Fetal Rights Fiction Film Finances First Things flags Folk Religion Food Foreign Affairs Forgiveness Frank Sheed Free Speech Freedom gay & lesbian persons Genocide George W. Bush George Weigel Gerald L. Campbell Girard/Mimetic Theory Global Warming Globalization Gnosticism Good Friday Grace Gratitude Greed Grey Cup 2009 Guadalupe Guest Post Guest Posts Gun Control Gustave Martelet Habitat for Humanity Hans Urs von Balthasar Harry Potter Hate Speech Health Health Care Healthcare Heather King Hebrew Bible Henri de Lubac Henry Karlson Herbert McCabe Heresy HHS Mandate Controversy History Holidays Holiness Holy Spirit Homiletics Homily Homosexuality Hope Hospitality How Far Can We Go? How Far Can We Go? Human Person Human Rights Humanae Vitae Humility Humor Hunger Hunting Identity Idolatry Ignacio Ellacuría Imagination Immigration In Memoriam Income Inequality Inculturation Indigenous People Individualism Inklings Intellect Interdependence Internet Interpretation Interviews Introduction Iraq War Islam Israel Jain James Alison James Martin Jazz Jesus Christ Jews Joe Biden Joe Hargrave Johann Baptist Metz John Allen John Henry Newman John Paul II John the Baptist John XXIII Jonathan Josef Pieper Joseph (the husband of Mary) Joseph Bernardin Joseph Ratzinger Josh Brumfield Journals Joy Judgment Just War Justice Kari Lundgren Karl Rahner Katerina Ivanovna Kenya Keynes Kingdom of God Kyle R. Cupp Labor Language Latin America Law Leanne Ogasawara Legion of Christ Leisure Lent Liberalism Liberation Theology Libertarianism Libya Lies Life life & dignity & responsibility of the human person Literature Little Way Liturgical music Liturgical Year Liturgy Living Simply Living Wage Local Church Lombard Lord of the Rings Louis Dupre Love M.Z. Magic Magisterium Mark DeFrancisis Mark Gordon Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Jr. Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masculinity Matt Talbot Matthew Fish Matthew Levering McCain Media Memorial Day Mennonites Mental Illness mercy Michael Iafrate Middle East militarism Miroslav Volf Mitt Romney Modesty Moral Theology Morality Mormonism Morning's Minion Mother Teresa Music Muslims Natalie Nate Wildermuth Nationalism Native Americans Nature Nazis Neuhaus New Evangelization New York City News NFP nihilism Nonviolence Not Abortion Nova's Ordo Nuclear weapons Nuns Obama Occult Old Age Opus Dei Ordination ordination of women original sin Orthodoxy Oscar Romero Other Voices Pacifism Palestine Palin Papacy Papal Peace Messages Papal Social Encyclicals Particular Affections Partisanship Patriotism Paul Paul Ryan Paul VI Peace Pentimento persecution Personalism Phantastes Philosophy PKD Planned Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Policraticus Politcal Apathy Politics Poll Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Pope John Paul II Pope Leo XIV Population Postcolonialsim Poverty Power Prayer Preaching Predictions Predictions for 2012 President Barack Obama priestly formation & discernment Pro-Life Progress Prophetic Witness Proportionalism Public Diplomacy Public Policy Question Quotes Rachel Maddow Racism Radical Catholic Mom Radical Catholicism Raymund Schwager Real Catholic TV Real Presence Reconciliation Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Religion religious freedom Responsibility Ressourcement Resurrection Rick Garnett Ridiculous Crap You Never Thought You'd See Robert Barron Roe v. Wade Roman Curia Rome Russia Sacraments Saints Salvation History Sam Harris Sam Rocha Same-sex Marriage Saskatchewan Roughriders Satire School of the Americas Science Scripture Seamless Garment Second Vatican Council Seeing Sex sexual violence Sexuality Sia Sin social justice Social Security Socialism Society of Jesus Sofia Loves Wisdom Solidarity Sophia soteriology Soutenus Spirituality Sports St. Dismas St. Joseph Stanley Hauerwas Statistics Stimulus Suffering Sunday Reflections Supernatural Supreme Court Symbolism Syria Taxing Technology Terrorism The State The Tea Party The Trump Administration Theological Anthropology Theology Theotokos Thomas Merton Throwaway Culture Tim Muldoon Tim Riley Tim Tebow Time Titian Tolkien Torture Toys Trade Traditionalism Transgender Transportation Transubstantiation Trinity Truth TV U.S. Affairs Uncategorized Unions unity among people who disagree US Catholicism USCCB Usury Utilitarianism Utopia Valentine's Day Vatican Vatican II Veterans Vicarious Suffering Video Violence Virgin Mary Vocations Voluntary Associations Voluntary Poverty Voting Vox Nova vox nova blog war War and Peace War Strategy Wealth Weirdness Welfare state Women Women Priests Work Woundedness Youth

Select a Month June 2026 May 2025 February 2025 January 2025 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 July 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 November 2021 September 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How did the apostles choose Matthias to replace Judas?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They cast lots Peter appointed him By Vote By the Holy Spirit