Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

UU Collective

Home
New Visions
Bingo (and Religion) Exists and Is Everywhere About Us

Bingo (and Religion) Exists and Is Everywhere About Us

Last updated on: April 14, 2016 at 6:25 am by David Breeden

Bingo (and Religion) Exists and Is Everywhere About Us 2016-04-14T06:25:32-06:00 David Breeden

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A RELIGIOUS NON-COMBATANT

For some reason, when some folks discover I’m a humanist, they seem to think I want to argue about religion. I don’t want to argue about religion. As far as I’m concerned, religion is a lot like bingo: you’re interested or you’re not. Some people grow up in families or communities that virtually require interest. Some develop an interest for one reason or another.

Some, like me, were interested once upon a time due to circumstance but lose the interest as they mature or move to other places. Others just don’t see bingo.

I really don’t want to argue about religion any more than I want to play another bingo game. But, like bingo, I understand that religion is a thing for a lot of people. Bingo and religion—they’re categories.

IT’S A GAME

The twentieth century philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein thought a lot about language and how it works. To get a handle on how we think in language, Wittgenstein considered this whole category that we call “games:” Bingo. Chess. Tennis. Tic Tac Toe. Baseball. And on . . . We understand that all these games fall under the general category “games,” but what do they all have in common? How do we know that bingo and basketball are both games?

After all, some games we play with a pencil; some we play with a ball. Some we play with those tiddlywinks things. For some games we wear particular sorts of clothing.

Some play games for fun; some play games for a living. What do all games have in common?

Well, so, “games” is an abstraction, isn’t it? We can even find what we might call an “essence” of games, perhaps. That’s another thing Wittgenstein tried to figure out: what, if anything, is the essence of “games.”

Over time I’ve tried to solve Ludwig’s conundrum concerning what all games have in common. For my money, the philosopher Bernard Suits got closest. Suits has been called the “gamer’s philosopher.” He defines games as, “the voluntary attempt to overcome unnecessary obstacles.” Allow me to repeat that: “the voluntary attempt to overcome unnecessary obstacles.”

BINGO EXISTS AND THIS IS WHAT IT REQUIRES OF YOU

What can we make of the category called “religion”? Wittgenstein avoided that one. But it’s what I get paid to do. (I don’t get paid to argue about it.) So, I ask: what is the essence of the category “religion”?

OK, here goes: Religions tend to make truth claims; truth claims such as—“god exists and this is what god wants . . .” But that doesn’t sum up the category “religion” does it?

Ask some, and you’ll hear about the category “religion” requires one god or another. Others will say that some sort of truth claim concerning the supernatural is required. Yet, some religions, like Buddhism, for instance, don’t make claims about gods or the supernatural. Well . . . what do we make of that?

Might Bernard Suits be on the right track with his definition of games, “the voluntary attempt to overcome unnecessary obstacles”? The category “religion” might be described as something like “the voluntary attempt to overcome inevitable obstacles . . .”

Life, like golf, has it’s sandpits, right? And tiddlywinks has its . . . tiddles.

Perhaps Ludwig Wittgenstein did have something to say about religion, despite himself, however. He did say this:

One could say “every view has its charm,” but that a would be false. The correct thing to say is that every view is significant for the one who sees it as significant (but that does not mean, “sees it other than it is.” Indeed, in this sense, every view is equally significant. (“Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough,” emphasis added*.)*

Oh, dear. Ludwig is getting seriously close to relativism there, isn’t he? But here’s the thing: bingo is significant to me if I see it as significant, correct? And, like religion, some people are required to play particular games, like it or not. (Volition is the hole in the definition that B. Suits offers—a Western and class bias.)

Which is my point—religions, like games, are a matter of taste, at least for the fortunate ones on our shared planet. Why wouldn’t they be? How couldn’t they be?

No, I don’t want to argue about religion. Bingo lovers unite, and all that. But why fight about it? If it works for you, bully for you. Bingo!

Previous Post

April 12, 2016

A spiritual responsibility for a moral tomorrow

Next Post

April 14, 2016 Y'all Means All: Veto a Bad Bill

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #9/11 Abortion Class community conflict Digital Life Diversity Divorce Environmental issues Evangelism Faith Development Foregiveness Garden glbt Gratitude Grief Healing health care Holidays Hospitality Interfaith LGBT Issues Military Service Mortality Orlando Parenting Peace Politics Power Prayer Racism Relationships Religion Scripture Senior citizens Sermons simplicity Social Justice Spirituality Sports Sustainability Uncategorized Unitarian Universalist Values Women's Issues World Community Worship

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The parable of the Good Samaritan is found in all four Gospels.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE