Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

UU Collective

Why Does a Super-Nice Word Like “Spiritual” Make Humanists All Itchy?

Last updated on: October 22, 2015 at 9:20 am   by David Breeden

Why Does a Super-Nice Word Like “Spiritual” Make Humanists All Itchy? 2015-10-22T09:20:24-06:00 David Breeden

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here is what Plato had to say about the body and the soul:

Does not purification consist in this . . . in separating as much as possible the soul from the body, and in accustoming it to gather and collect itself by itself on all sides apart from the body, and to dwell, so far as it can, both now and hereafter, alone by itself, delivered, as it were, from the shackles of the body? (Phaedo)

Body and soul. Separate. The body impure . . . the thing that drives our poor, innocent souls to sex, selfishness, and overindulgence. The soul, that eternal, heaven-hungry thing; that incredible, detachable, part of ourselves that will live in bliss forever . . . IMG_0096if only it can first conquer and then separate from that nasty, nasty body. 

That’s the thinking that drove the Western World all through the reign of Christendom. It fills the parking lots of  mega-churches to this day. Reinforcing that body/soul dichotomy is why the early Christians worked so hard to stamp out the philosophy of Epicurus, whose philosophy would nowadays be called secular moral realism, a naturalistic worldview. 

The dualists did a good job. The term “Epicurean” still has negative connotations. 

For Plato and the Platonists, it’s all about a disembodied soul and the next world. For Epicurus and the Epicureans, it’s all about the connection of body and consciousness in this world, now. This very old argument between two very different world views is why the word spiritual makes so many Humanists nervous. It implies the continuation of an age-old argument in the Western tradition, that of separating the physical from the spiritual, head from heart. For the past two-and-a-half millennia, naturalists have lost the fight. (But who’s bitter?)  Naturalists are still here insisting that there is no separation between our thoughts and our bodies, that all our thoughts are embodied thoughts necessarily.

And when we die, as Epicurus put it, our atoms disperse.

I don’t know who’s correct—or even if the question is an either/or—but entertaining clear dichotomies clarifies thinking. And this dialectic brings into bold relief the bigger question—the basic question of religion or philosophy—How should I live my life?

Am I living my life in order to prepare for the next one by keep my soul pure, or to get it pure again? Or are my thoughts and actions part of a physical continuity—a self—that will cease when what we call life ceases?

Basic questions each of us does well to answer as best we can. Seriously: how should I live my life? How well do my commitments actually match my goals?

What do I owe to my self, to my soul, to humanity, and to world?

Epicurus focused the question this way:

You are not master of tomorrow, yet you postpone your happiness. Life is wasted in procrastination. 

If human beings do indeed have a detachable soul, Plato was most likely right about what to do: get as far away from that body as possible. 

However, the naturalist Epicurus taught that in order to live a good life, we have to stop and think about it. Think it through. Look at the bigger picture. Humanists also get itchy around the word “spiritual” when it comes before “practice,” but whatever you call it, we all need it. 

The Epicureans and the Stoics and the Buddhists were all very suspicious of what we nowadays call self-talk. This inner dialogue very clearly creates our attitudes about our lives, yet is the self-talk constructive, or even coherent, for that matter? 

Might it be lying to us?

For these meditative traditions, that is the point of daily practice—getting hold of our self-talk and giving it direction.

At its essence the spiritual exercise of meditation is about taking some time out of time to have a deep conversation with yourself, an inner dialogue. Meditation enables us to talk with ourselves, and, the most difficult challenge of all—in meditation we sometimes actually LISTEN to ourselves and find our arguments convincing!

You are not master of tomorrow. How about sitting down and having a talk with yourself about that?

Evangelism

Faith Development

Healing

Mortality

Religion

Spirituality

Unitarian

Universalist

Values

#humanism #soul

Previous Post



October 21, 2015

Things that get in the way

Next Post



October 29, 2015 Words, Words, and the Word Was With . . .


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #9/11 Abortion Class community conflict Digital Life Diversity Divorce Environmental issues Evangelism Faith Development Foregiveness Garden glbt Gratitude Grief Healing health care Holidays Hospitality Interfaith LGBT Issues Military Service Mortality Orlando Parenting Peace Politics Power Prayer Racism Relationships Religion Scripture Senior citizens Sermons simplicity Social Justice Spirituality Sports Sustainability Uncategorized Unitarian Universalist Values Women's Issues World Community Worship

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who danced with all his might before the LORD as the Ark was brought to Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Samuel David Nathan Jonathan

Related posts from UU Collective

New Visions

#Charlottesville and Getting Real

UU Collective

New Visions

On the Suppression of Knowledge

UU Collective

New Visions

#Epicurus and Atomic Moderation

UU Collective

New Visions

Steal Your Fire, Drink Your Tea

UU Collective

TRENDING AT PATHEOS New Visions

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all New Visions blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube