Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

UU Collective

Home
New Visions
The Myth of Science Versus Religion

The Myth of Science Versus Religion

Last updated on: June 11, 2015 at 6:19 am by David Breeden

The Myth of Science Versus Religion 2015-06-11T06:19:24-06:00 David Breeden

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Getting the Metaphor Right

It was the German writer Heinrich Heine who imagined a battle of Hebrews versus Hellenes. Soon it began to be imagined as Jerusalem versus Athens. Nowadays we endlessly tease at the science / religion chasm. Endlessly we ask: is it a chasm? A great divide? Is it reconcilable?

Heine was looking to the recent European past, the Age of Enlightenment, in which the chief theorists had seen themselves as purveyors of light to a world darkened by religion. Diderot. Voltaire. Hume. As Diderot put it, “We preach wisdom to the deaf, and we are still far indeed from the age of reason.”

The Enlightenment thinkers created a narrative in which the ancient world—by which they meant Classical Greece and Rome—had risen to great heights of human achievement that were dashed by the rise of Christianity. The Italian poet and scholar Petrarch first conceived of the Dark Ages that followed in the wake of Christian supremacy over Europe.

“Enlightenment” was the antidote. This time, Reason would not fail . . .

This narrative has continued. Heine himself is remembered as a Romantic, throwing off the shackles of Reason to get in touch again with the human heart. With the US version of Romanticism, Transcendentalism, Ralph Waldo Emerson battled against the cold reason that had descended upon Unitarian thinking.

The first Humanist Manifesto of 1933 began explicitly: “The time is past for mere revision of traditional attitudes.”

And so the “battle” goes on. If in doubt, Google “science verses religion:” court cases; polemics; politicians; fuss and bother.

The “battle” is good for headlines and now “click bait,” but the battle of good and evil, light and darkness, that Petrarch and his grandchildren of the Enlightenment delineated is about politics, not philosophy or religion.

A Little Night Music

As a Humanist myself, I’m placed willy-nilly in a camp. I don’t think there are camps, however. For Enlightenment philosopher David Hume, a heresy trial and the gallows were real possibilities. In some parts of our planet, similar consequences still await. But, again, that’s politics, not religion and philosophy meeting in conversation.

In those places in the world where freedom of and from religion exists, most people choose to visit a physician. Most people go to auto mechanics rather than saying prayers over broken cars. We may chat with chaplains about suffering and death and dying, but we trust to physicians and psychologists when the rubber meets the road.

In that world, Humanism and a materialist world view do not stand in stark contrast or in opposition to religions, but as the non-metaphorical alternative, using “day language” as opposed to “night language,” as Michael Dowd, the evangelist for evolution, puts it. Yes, that’s still a light / dark metaphor, but not one of warfare. Merely the ebb and flow of human thinking on any given day.

The Enlightenment and its child, Humanism, were not discontinuous but part of the evolution of human thought. As a Humanist, I see religions of all stripes not as containers for truths but as interesting literature, and fascinating antique shops for wandering through, picking up the odd wool cards or cow bell. They are old interpretive systems that sought for answers that scholarship and science now answer in much more useful and effective ways. Still, late at night, there is that sudden noise . . .

As the German philosopher Emmanuel Kant put it: “We live not in an enlightened age but an Age of Enlightenment.” And so it goes.

(Still my favorite book on the Enlightenment is Peter Gay’s The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism.)

Previous Post

June 9, 2015

Anti-racism is essential for social change movements

Next Post

June 12, 2015 Anne Lamott and the Pee-Pee Tweet

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #9/11 Abortion Class community conflict Digital Life Diversity Divorce Environmental issues Evangelism Faith Development Foregiveness Garden glbt Gratitude Grief Healing health care Holidays Hospitality Interfaith LGBT Issues Military Service Mortality Orlando Parenting Peace Politics Power Prayer Racism Relationships Religion Scripture Senior citizens Sermons simplicity Social Justice Spirituality Sports Sustainability Uncategorized Unitarian Universalist Values Women's Issues World Community Worship

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your ____.

Select your answer to see how you score.

Heart Actions Mind Spirit