Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

UU Collective

Home
New Visions
Greenery Without People: The Future of Post-Religious Community

Greenery Without People: The Future of Post-Religious Community

Last updated on: February 12, 2015 at 8:19 am by David Breeden

Greenery Without People: The Future of Post-Religious Community 2015-02-12T08:19:53-07:00 David Breeden

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I don’t get it about the natural world.
Like, greenery,
without people in it, is supposed
to do what?

~Charles Smith

How to do religious community in a post-religious world . . . . As a senior minister in an urban congregation, it’s something I think about every day.

For most urban North Americans, the choice of (non)religious community is as profuse as the choice of breakfast cereals, frozen pizzas, or any other consumer good. We can even find pizza and religious community online.

Despite our interconnecting electronic webs, however, we human beings are still very much tribal animals. There is national allegiance; political affiliation; sports teams; race; religion; which generation you are; which popular or unpopular singer you listen to; which Beatle you like, or if you’ve heard of the Beatles; choice in attire; which computer company you buy from . . . an endless list of genetics, geography, time, choices, and fate. Besides all that, there are many who do not have any of those choices, which in most cases is not a choice.

Then there is the non-urban. “Where do you go to church?” is still a definitive question in much of rural America. The answer to that question defines where a person is on the social scale, and even if someone figures into social calculations beyond the category “outcast” at all.

It’s complicated.

The choices I look to and attempt to nourish are explicitly urban and post-religious. I meet fewer and fewer people who have been damaged by religion in childhood. Fewer and fewer people who feel any compunction to sign onto any particular religious tradition. Fewer and fewer people who find much beyond historical interest in older interpretive systems.

One advantage I have is that my congregation, First Unitarian Society of Minneapolis, declared itself explicitly humanist and post-religious ninety-nine years ago. When questions about how to “do” prayer or child dedications or weddings or funerals come up, I can point to a long a rich history of secular ceremonies. That’s because the congregation has remained “religious” in its humanism, meaning we celebrate life passages communally and still have Sunday morning services, which we have long called “assemblies.” In this “religious” orientation we are much like Ethical Culture Societies and the newer phenomenon of Sunday Assemblies.

Will these post-religious congregations survive? That’s still an open question. Which is why, looking at the empty rooms in the building during the week, I think of alternative ways of filling them. Small atheist groups. Secular humanist groups. Secular Twelve-Step programs. Advocacy non-profits of various types that align with the mission of the congregation.

My suspicion is that the “butts in pews” measure of congregational success is fast approaching its end. Saving that model is not the point, any more than saving a building has a point other than as a place for people to gather into a tribe dedicated to purposes other than consumerism and identity politics.

The question I ask myself is: What is it we offer to world? My answer is, a post-religious, post-Eurocentric, post-colonial ethics that provides meaning and purpose to individuals, humanity, and the world we live in.

The poet Charles Smith says,

I don’t get it about the natural world.
Like, greenery,
without people in it, is supposed
to do what?

People. Gathering in support of each other. People thinking about the way we do things and what we do. That’s what matters.

A building without people in it is supposed to do, like, what?

Previous Post

February 11, 2015

Is Sex Necessary?

Next Post

February 19, 2015 Apocalypse: What Death Cults Really Want

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #9/11 Abortion Class community conflict Digital Life Diversity Divorce Environmental issues Evangelism Faith Development Foregiveness Garden glbt Gratitude Grief Healing health care Holidays Hospitality Interfaith LGBT Issues Military Service Mortality Orlando Parenting Peace Politics Power Prayer Racism Relationships Religion Scripture Senior citizens Sermons simplicity Social Justice Spirituality Sports Sustainability Uncategorized Unitarian Universalist Values Women's Issues World Community Worship

Select a Month August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the first miracle Jesus performed according to John's Gospel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Walking on water Feeding the 5000 Turning water into wine Raising Lazarus