Did Christ Die for Non-Human Animals?

Last updated on: April 26, 2017 at 8:21 am by Kyle Roberts

Did Christ Die for Non-Human Animals? 2017-04-26T08:21:52-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Good Friday reflections on the cross usually focus on the significance of Christ’s death for humans.

Hieronymus Bosch, “The Garden of Earthly Delights” Public Domain, WikiCommons

Christ died for you and for me. Or even, Christ died for the world–with the world taken in an abstract sense or as a cipher for all human beings.

But why shouldn’t the “world” include all living creatures? Why shouldn’t it include non-human animals? Your dog, your cat, your parrot? The chipmunk tunneling under your house?

In short, if human beings are in need of Christ’s atonement, so is all of creation. All creation stands in need of healing, of redemption, of reconciliation.

Perhaps the apostle Paul implies this in Romans:

I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. For the creation waits in eager expectation for the children of God to be revealed. For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God.

We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time.

Doesn’t “creation” include all of life, every living thing–every species, including the 98% which are now extinct? The reconciliation of the cosmos in Christ is a total reconciliation.

In Christ and Evolution: Wonder and Wisdom, Celia Deane-Drummond includes an interesting discussion of the application of the meaning of the atonement for non-human animals.

If we take evolution seriously then we have to take death and suffering seriously in our theology. Furthermore, we should recognize that the usual qualitative distinction drawn between human beings and all other animal life is mainly unfounded. We can posit quantitative difference (sliding scale differences) between some capabilities of human beings (intelligence, moral reasoning, etc.), but that doesn’t that human beings possess those things while other animals do not.

Deane-Drummond acknowledges that to speak of “morality” in non-human animals is complicated and controversial. She offers the distinction of a “three-dimensional” morality in humans and only a “two-dimensional” morality in other animals, insofar as “they are unable to anticipate harms and goods to the same extent as humans” (166).

Nonetheless, her point is intriguing: all animals–not just humans–stand equally in need of the liberation of creation, of God’s transforming and redeeming grace.

She doesn’t advocate a traditional penal substitutionary theory of atonement, but rather something more like a redemptive and transformational atonement, one in which the problem addressed by the cross isn’t sin against a holy God, but suffering, death, and evil in need of healing. Christ enters nature to heal it from within and the cross represents Christ sharing in the suffering of the world, but for the purpose of healing it in God’s love.

In this sense, cross and resurrection go hand in hand.

I love Moltmann’s suggestion that all living creatures will be included in the new creation. All will be resurrected to new life in God.

In The Coming of God, he writes,

The eschatological field of human hopes and fears, longings and desires, has always been a favorite playground for egocentricism and anthropocentricism, and for the exclusion of anything strange and different. But true hope must be universal, because its healing future embraces every individual and the whole universe. If we were to surrender hope for as much as one single creature, for us God would not be God.

So to the question: Did Christ die for non-human animals, too? I answer a hopeful “Yes!”

Previous Post

April 6, 2017

Four Ways to Interpret the "Rock," the Foundation of Jesus' Church

Next Post

April 15, 2017 The Resurrection Revealed Jesus as Divine (Pannenberg)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz