Pietism is the “One and Only Consequence of Christianity” (Kierkegaard Says)

Last updated on: December 11, 2016 at 3:45 pm by Kyle Roberts

Pietism is the “One and Only Consequence of Christianity” (Kierkegaard Says) 2016-12-11T15:45:40-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yes, indeed, pietism (properly understood, not simply in the sense of abstaining from dancing and such externals, no in the sense of witnessing for the truth and suffering for it, together with the sense that suffering in the world belongs to being a Christian, and that a shrewd and secular conformity with this world is unchristian)–yes indeed, pietism is the one and only consequence of Christianity. – S. Kierkegaard

Johann Arndt’s True Christianity

I’m looking forward to participating this Tuesday in a upcoming colloquium on pietism.

There will be a session on the History of Scandinavian Pietism in the A.M., followed by the keynote address (to which I’ll be responding) by Efrem Smith, CEO of World Impact, and long-time leader in the Evangelical Covenant denomination. In the afternoon, there will be a session on Pietism, Gender, and Contemporary Christianity. (See Chris Gehrz’s blog for the full schedule)

Very briefly and crudely, pietism was a movement of continental European Christians (beginning in Germany with Lutherans, and expanding from there) who wanted to shift emphasis away from the dry, doctrinal precision-oriented nature of Lutheran Orthodoxy and toward a praxis and experiential-oriented Christianity — one which prioritized both inward spiritual depth and external action (and social activism) in response to the life and teachings of Jesus.

In short, it was a movement concerned with active discipleship.

Kierkegaard once called Pietism, “the one and only consequence of Christianity.” He was careful to point out that he wasn’t inspired by the legalistic and moralistic manifestations of Pietism (no drinking, dancing, etc.). These preoccupations were perversions of Christianity. Rather, it was the heartfelt inwardness that was linked to the earnest attempt to follow Christ, even in the face of “collisions” with the world. That’s the Pietism he wanted — and that should inspire us still today.

Previous Post

December 10, 2016

If Augustine's Theory of the "Fall" is Right, What About Righteous Noah?

Next Post

December 15, 2016 Inerrancy: A "Comforting Gauze that Conceals Ugliness" (Worthen)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz