What do you Get When You Scratch a Neo-Evangelical?

Last updated on: December 1, 2016 at 9:53 am by Kyle Roberts

What do you Get When You Scratch a Neo-Evangelical? 2016-12-01T09:53:02-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Molly Worthen’s The Apostles of Reason: The Crisis of Authority in American Evangelicalism, is a lively and fresh look into the strategic morphing of early 20th century fundamentalism into the conservative, white Protestant movement known today as evangelicalism, or by its more technical term, “neo-evangelicalism.”

By BPL [CC BY 2.0] via Wikimedia Commons

“Neo-evangelicalism” was the term adopted by leaders of this movement who wanted to distance themselves from the perceived cultural backwardness of their fundamentalist forebears (ala the fire-breathing version of preachers like Billy Sunday – image above) while retaining most, if not all, of their theological fundamentals as central to Christian orthodoxy.

Worthen argues that at the heart of this movement (neo-evangelicalism) lies the “crisis of authority” (thus the subtitle of her book). Neo-evangelicals have consistently gathered themselves around an unflenching conviction in God’s special, authoritative, and written revelation. This conviction has usually gone by the name inerrancy, a presupposition that because God does not (even cannot) make mistakes, the Bible can’t contain errors either. (Though evangelicals don’t always agree on what constitutes an error).

What makes ne0-evangelicalism unique from, pre-modern views of revelation is that, well, it is thoroughly modern. It basically adheres to Enlightenment assumptions about the possibility for certainty. We can know things, objective facts, just by looking clearly at them. And the Bible, of course, is a veritable storehouse of divinely revealed, objective “facts.” The facts of all facts, because deposited there by God. So, apply the right method, and you’ve got Truth at your fingertips.

The problem, then, is how such a view of authority works its way out in the real world, when there is no single ecclesial council or authoritative church tradition to determine what the presumed error-less Bible actually says, or what it means. It’s one thing to claim inerrancy as a quality of the text (which is a highly dubious claim); it’s another thing to come to any sense of agreement about what the text is saying and how it guides theology and life in the present. An inerrant text doesn’t guarantee an inerrant interpretation.

This problem is especially acute in a diverse (in some ways), organic, loose coalition of theologians, churches, denominations, schools, and other institutions, having no single overarching structure to bind it together and to determine the implications of and boundaries of that authoritative, inerrant Bible.

The other problem, as Worthen explains it, is this: evangelicals wanted to distance themselves (culturally, though not necessarily theologically) from fundamentalism. So, of their thought leaders pursued academic respectability and cultural influence. They went to elite schools, studied with the most highly regarded professors. But this pursuit for academic respectability often brought them into conflict with their fundamentalist theological convictions.

The “authority” of reason, science, the academy, etc., would always have to give way to the authority of the Bible, or what God had supposedly straight-forwardly and propositionally revealed–there for any to see who have the eyes to see (or at least the correct method and motivations).

At the base of that collision lies the secret of understanding the anxiety still bubbling up within evangelical institutions.

Worthen writes,

Scratch a neo-evangelical and underneath you would likely find a fundamentalist who still preferred the comforts of purity to the risks of free inquiry and collaboration. Their efforts did not calm evangelical anxieties over the place of the Bible in modern life. Instead, they institutionalized them….

They designed their colleges and seminaries to protect the faithful, not as schools with the confidence to invite all comers and entertain any challenge.

Understanding this anxiety about authority is the right place to start when trying to understand American evangelicalism today, at least in its institutional and ecclesial forms. Worthen’s book may be the best single guide.

Previous Post

November 21, 2016

The Surprising Evangelical Switch from Virtue to Consequences

Next Post

December 2, 2016 Into the Light of Christmas: From Ordinary to Extraordinary, from Facts to Meanings

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz