Paul Ryan’s Disavowal of Trump’s Racist Comment Rings Hollow

Last updated on: June 7, 2016 at 11:40 am by Kyle Roberts

Paul Ryan’s Disavowal of Trump’s Racist Comment Rings Hollow 2016-06-07T11:40:20-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, who has been slow to coming around in support of Donald Trump’s candidacy, has clearly rounded the bend.

Image by Gage Skidmore, CC0 2.0, via Flikr

However, today Ryan disavowed Trump’s recent firestorm comments about U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel. In those comments, Trump suggested the judge’s Mexican heritage makes him unfit to preside over the ongoing Trump University case.

The Ryan highlights:

“I disavow those comments … I regret those comments that he made.”

“Claiming that a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment.”

“It’s absolutely unacceptable.”

But with Trump as the Republican nominee, Ryan must throw his support behind him, come hell or high water. Politics is so often about ideology, about tribal loyalty, and about power, after all. So,

“But do I believe Hilary Clinton is the answer? No, I do not.”

“I think they’re [Trump’s comments] wrong. I don’t think they’re right-headed.”

But at the end of the day, this is about ideas. This is about moving our agenda forward.”

I’m going to defend our ideas, …I’m going to defend our agenda. what matters to us most is our principles and the policies that come from our principles and our ability to give the people of this country a better way forward.

We believe we have a better likelihood of passing that [with Trump] than we would with a president Clinton.

It’s fascinating to observe Ryan struggling with the cognitive dissonance here. We all must do it, to some degree or other, in some way or other. But when it’s on the public stage like this, it’s quite something to behold.

But still, one must ask the question why an admittedly racist comment could be disavowed and yet at the same time, not considered to be pertinent to the “ideas’ and “agenda” and “principles” and “politics” that are to be defended? Shouldn’t anti-racism be part of agenda, core to hose principles that will “give the people of this country a better way forward”?

If so, why is Trump’s candidacy really the best answer to our problems, Mr. Ryan?

The disavowal rings hollow.

Previous Post

June 6, 2016

Is Free Will an Illusion? (Scientists Say...)

Next Post

June 7, 2016 Martin Luther on the Importance of Inviting Death Into Our Presence

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz