After Orlando, the #1 Rule of Religion Must be Love

Last updated on: June 13, 2016 at 11:56 am by Kyle Roberts

After Orlando, the #1 Rule of Religion Must be Love 2016-06-13T11:56:59-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Following the immediate shock and grief of the terror and tragedy of Orlando, the media discussion has turned to the causes. How–and why–would someone carry out such a heinous act?

Screenshot via YouTube

Should we attribute this evil to mental/emotional instability, to militant religious fanaticism, to extreme homophobia, or simply to an unleashing of raw unabashed hatred? And what role does the ridiculous laxity in gun regulations (ease of access) play in how we assign culpability?

The question that’s received the most attention so far is whether the Orlando terror was mainly about religion (militant Islam, ISIS) or mainly about hate/homophobia.

The answer is surely: Yes. This is about religion and about hate. It’s about hate using religion. It’s about religion using hate.

Hate is one of the most powerful human emotions we have. It can destroy us from the inside out.

Religion is one of the most powerful cultural phenomena we have. It can inspire us, it can embolden us to work for justice and for the good of others. It can also destroy us from the insight out. It can make use of hate, to draw lines between people. It can make use of hate to spawn violence and destruction.

Augustine, in On Christian Doctrine, his tract on the interpretation of the Bible, wrote about the primacy of love in the Christian religion. The end goal of interpretation of Scripture is the same as the end goal of Christianity, he said: the love of God and the love of neighbor (which means all people).

For Augustine, the criterion we should use to determine whether we have correctly interpreted the Bible–and whether we are rightly practicing Christian faith–is love. Does an interpretation instill more love for God? More love for neighbor? Even if a reader has incorrectly identified the original meaning of the text (i.e. the author’s original intention), so long as the interpretation leads to more love, that end result covers over the flaw in interpretation. Love covers over a multitude of sins (even interpretive sins).

Because love is the goal, love is always also the criterion.

Anyone committed to religion today, whether as practitioners, leaders, or theologians, should have as their #1 goal the love of God and love of neighbor. These two loves do not conflict! Love must be our criterion for determining whether we are doing Christianity right; it must be the criterion for determining whether we are doing religion right.

Like human emotions (love and hate), religion is very powerful and it’s very precarious, too. It can subtly and quickly shift from life-giving to life-taking. It can be used for death or for life.

Life is short and we don’t have much time to waste. Let’s double down on our commitment that love be the rule, that love be the criterion.

Previous Post

June 9, 2016

Richard Beck Wants to Bring the Devil Back (Sort of)

Next Post

June 15, 2016 "You Are Accepted": What a Strange Idea (Paul Tillich)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz