“The Gods Favor Those Who Conquer”: On the Myth of Redemptive Violence (Walter Wink)

Last updated on: February 19, 2016 at 10:30 am by Kyle Roberts

“The Gods Favor Those Who Conquer”: On the Myth of Redemptive Violence (Walter Wink) 2016-02-19T10:30:39-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The gods favor those who conquer.

The Conquest of the Amorites, by James Tissot (via WikiCommons)

Walter Wink’s now-classic book, Engaging the Powers, begins with a definition of what he calls the “Domination System,” which captures the way that the “Powers” (economics, politics, power arrangements, etc.) operate in the majority of social arrangements throughout the history of the modern homo sapien.

Wink explains that at the very root of the Domination System lies “the myth of redemptive violence.” This myth is “the original religion of the status quo, and is the “first articulation of ‘might makes right.'” (16). This myth asserts that order comes through chaos only by means of violence. Salvation (redemption) comes through the exertion of strength, military might, strategic victory over others.

The gods favor those who conquer.

We find this myth operating in much of the biblical material (God conquers the enemies of Israel, thus proving that God is the God of them and not of the others). We find it at the core of virulent nationalisms–often disguised as harmless patriotism.

We find it at work throughout much of the history of religion, Christianity obviously included. Wink writes,

The myth of redemptive violence thus uses the traditions, rites, customs, and symbols of Christianity in order to enhance the power of a wealthy elite and the goals of the nation narrowly defined. It has no interest in compassion for the poor, or for more equitable economic arrangements, or for the love of enemies. It merely uses the shell of religion–a shell that can be filled with the blasphemous doctrine of the national security state. Emptied of their prophetic vitality, these outer forms are then manipulated to legitimate a power system [the Domination System] intent on the preservation of privilege at all costs.

Why then do large masses of the nonprivileged submit to such a myth? Why, for example, do blue-collar workers, who are among those most victimized by the ruling elite, continue not only to support their oppressors but to be among their most vociferous fans? The answer is quite simple: the promise of salvation.

Salvation, Wink explains that salvation comes through “identification” with the powerful other, or what Ernest Becker calls identifying with the charismatic Hero through transference.

Overwhelmed by the giantism of corporations, bureaucracies, universities, the military, and celebrities, individuals sense that the only escape from utter insignificance lies in identifying with these giants and idolizing them as the true bearers of their own human identity. (29)

But Dr. Wink, is there any way out of this Domination System? Can the “myth of redemptive violence” be exposed, undone, overcome?

Yes, there is, but it is difficult. To face the fear of enemies would finally require us to acknowledge our own inner evil, and that would cost us all our hard-earned self-esteem. We would have to change, laboriously, struggling daily to transform or redeem our shadow side. We would have to see ourselves as no different in kind from our enemy (however different we may be in degree). It would mean seeing God in the enemy as we learn to see God in ourselves–a God who loves and forgives and can transform even the most evil person or society in the world. Such insight would require conversion from the myth of redemptive violence to the God proclaimed by the prophets and by Jesus…

We could no longer justify unchristian means to preserve at all costs the hollow shell of a “Christian civilization” that has, in effect, been filled with the creed of redemptive violence.” (30)

Image Source

For more theology posts and discussion, like / follow Unsystematic Theology on Facebook

Previous Post

February 18, 2016

"The Pope v. the Donald": Two Contrasting Eschatologies?

Next Post

February 23, 2016 On Facing Suffering: James Cone, Kierkegaard, and the Blues

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz