Brueggemann’s Prophetic Imagination and the “Book that Breathes”

Last updated on: February 17, 2016 at 4:37 pm by Kyle Roberts

Brueggemann’s Prophetic Imagination and the “Book that Breathes” 2016-02-17T16:37:41-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Walter Brueggemann is a rare bird. He’s a biblical scholar, an Old Testament theologian, with an acute sensibility for the contemporary significance of that ancient text.

Walter Brueggemann, used by permission

He seems to have imbibed the spirit of the prophets–ingesting and applying their “prophetic imagination” to problems and challenges of our time. His close attention to the ancient text seems to have given him a freedom to speak between worlds–with words of encouragement and inspiration and with words of incisive criticism.

In other words, he doesn’t seem easily beholden to ideological commitments, but displays both respect for the seriousness of the Bible (and the “authority of Scripture”) and realism about the humanity reflected in and through it–both in its original formation/formulations and in subsequent traditions of interpretation.

As I began to more systematically work through some of the conflicts and problems in the Bible and in the definitions of “biblical authority” I had inherited, Brueggemann was one of the theologians to which I turned.

I discovered his collection of essays in The Book That Breathes New Life and found there a treasure trove of measured, thoughtful, and yet incisively prophetic reflections on the Bible. He writes there both about the concept of authority (and the myriad ways that concept is misused and misunderstood) as well as about contemporary issues in the theological and biblical interpretation of the Old Testament.

He brilliantly models holding the tension of respect for the Bible and realism about its limitations. He explains how the Bible can be so disparately read and applied. It works well as a tool for ideological power and oppression as well as a instrument for righteous critique and liberative empowerment.

The Bible is a strange book; or rather, it is a collection of writings that open up a “strange new world”–to use the familiar Barth phrase of which Brueggemann is so fond. But for that strange new world to be the provocative, empowering, prophetic world that it can and should be, the reader must have cultivated an imagination that is capable of engaging it and hearing it on its terms, more than on the reader’s.

In a time of deep and increasing polarization, Brueggemann challenges us to see that ideological commitments themselves cannot give us access to the life-giving “new world” that the Bible can open up for us. For that, we need a prophetic imagination–an “alternative consciousness”–that is opened up for us by the intersection of Scripture, Spirit, and interpretive community.

But Brueggemann himself puts it better than I can in his preface to the recent edition of Book That Breathes:

In the end, scripture is not a contest to see who can prevail in interpretation. It is, rather, an address that offers a “newness” and a “strangeness” that are out beyond all of our pet projects. It is urgent, even if difficult to remember that it is “The word of the Lord” and not our world. The “world” given us in the text, moreover, is not our world but God’s new world into which we ourselves invited as sojourners and eventually as citizens. The offer is a homefulness amid our deep, shared homesickness. It is, however, home on terms other than our own!

Tripp Fuller, of Homebrewed Christianity fame, interviewed Brueggemann recently. The whole thing is worth a listen. Furthermore, you can hear him present at the Enfolding Theology conference in Redondo Beach, CA, March3-5.

Image Source

For more posts and discussion on theology and society, like/follow Unsystematic Theology on Facebook

Previous Post

February 12, 2016

The Problem of Certainty and "Making a Murderer"

Next Post

February 18, 2016 "The Pope v. the Donald": Two Contrasting Eschatologies?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz