The Evangelical Shift on Death Penalty is a Good Sign

Last updated on: October 21, 2015 at 8:59 am by Kyle Roberts

The Evangelical Shift on Death Penalty is a Good Sign 2015-10-21T08:59:24-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) by no means speaks authoritatively for all evangelicals. No one speaks authoritatively for all evangelicals. But the NAE does represent one of the few strong voices for evangelicals on ethical and public policy concerns and does attempt to speak on behalf of and lobby for evangelical concerns.

Death Row Cell, Old State Penitentiary Idaho, Flickr (Christopher)

So it’s notable that the NAE has recently announced a change of perspective on capital punishment to include an explicit voice of concern against the problems increasingly noted with the death penalty. They summarize those problems in that announcement as such:

Unfortunately, all human systems are fallible. Nonpartisan studies of the death penalty have identified systemic problems in the United States. These include eyewitness error, coerced confessions, prosecutorial misconduct, racial disparities, incompetent counsel, inadequate instruction to juries, judges who override juries that do not vote for the death penalty, and improper sentencing of those who lack the mental capacity to understand their crime.

In the first decade of the 21st century, 258 wrongfully convicted people have been exonerated due to the introduction of DNA evidence. Twenty of those were serving time on death row, and another 16 had been convicted of a capital crime but not sentenced to death.

The statement goes on to acknowledge that many evangelical leaders have mounted a “biblical and theological case either against the death penalty or against its continued use in a society where biblical standards of justice are difficult to reach.” This is a very important point: It’s one thing to call for “justice” to be done; it’s quite another thing to understand what it means, exactly, for justice to be done. In the rush to accomplish justice, we too often end up creating even more injustice. This is why I argued recently that the death penalty is an illustration of the fact that our view of justice is too thin, too narrow, too retributive.

There’s no telling what the shift in evangelical perspective (or at least the expansion of explicitly endorsed perspectives) will do for a change in policy. Will these increasingly anti-death penalty voices in the evangelical voting block and evangelical public theology have real sway in finally abolishing the death penalty? One can only hope and pray that it will.

Previous Post

October 20, 2015

For the Ecological Crisis, it's All (Moral) Hands on Deck

Next Post

October 22, 2015 Why Does Road Rage Happen? (Scientifically Speaking)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz