Pannenberg on the Strange, Political Nature of the Kingdom

Last updated on: September 21, 2015 at 2:03 pm by Kyle Roberts

Pannenberg on the Strange, Political Nature of the Kingdom 2015-09-21T14:03:33-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In participation for my Christian Ethics class this semester, I read Wolfhart Panneberg’s (the late, great, German theologian) Ethics.

Wolfhart Pannenbert, image from Bundesarchiv via Wikimedia Commons

His introductory chapter, “Society and the Christian Faith,” is a interesting reflection on the uniquely political, even paradoxically political, nature of the Christian gospel. The kingdom announced by and enacted by Jesus, Pannenberg says, is one that is certainly political in content–though having a different shape than other dominant political expressions.

Much of the conundrums Christians and the church face now is due to our inability to grasp the paradoxical dynamic of the political nature of the kingdom of God. Our problems are also due to our inability to keep in mind the provisional nature of the church (and of the state) in relation to the kingdom of God and in the context of the complicated church-state dynamic. Here’s a segment from that chapter. Note: I’ve segmented one long paragraph into smaller chunks:

The Kingdom of God which the prophets promised and for which the Jews hoped is political in nature. It is the Kingdom of God, the Lordship of God himself, that will bring the final resolution of the task with which all political order is concerned, but on which all human forms of government are wrecked, the task of establishing peace and righteousness among mankind.

When Jesus announced that the Kingdom of God was near, and proclaimed its presence through performing his mission, it was this political hope that was at issue. This is often forgotten, but the political theology of our own day has rediscovered it and emphasized it.

This political Kingdom of God, however, became present in Jesus in a remarkably unpolitical manner. It did not bring about a reform or a revolution in the relationships of society, but it raised the question of the attitude of the individual toward God’s future, the coming of God’s rule. For and through the individual who already commits himself fully to God’s future, God’s rule has become present.

This is the basis for the respect accorded to the individual in the Christian religion and also for the distinctive position of the church toward the state. Both of these assume that human destiny is a political destiny that has not been realized in definitive form and that cannot be so realized through political action, through changes in the social order.

That is a conviction to which Christianity held fast even in its relationship to the Constantinian and post-Constantinian political order based on the Christian faith itself. Even a political order that is built on a Christian foundation is not the Kingdom of God. It remains provisional.

And for this reason the church maintains its independence even in relationship to a political order founded on Christian principles. The church, through its proclamation and by the fellowship of its worship, imparts even now to the individual the gift of participation in future salvation, the presence of the Kingdom of God, which has never attained definitive form in the political order, even though the expectation of God’s sovereign rule has political content. (Westminster, 1977, pp. 10-11)

Previous Post

September 17, 2015

Every Society is a "Religion" and a Stage for Heroism (Becker)

Next Post

September 21, 2015 Sad Day for the CCCU: EMU and Goshen Resign

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz