We Need a Theology of the Cross Now More than Ever

Last updated on: February 16, 2015 at 10:47 pm by Kyle Roberts

We Need a Theology of the Cross Now More than Ever 2015-02-16T22:47:53-05:00 Kyle Roberts

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Martin Luther distinguished a theology of glory from a theology of the cross. A theology of glory looks to avoid suffering and sacrifice, and takes “victories,” accomplishments, and political or social stature to be signs of God’s favor. A theology of glory is comfortably nestled in Christendom, with all the comforts and pleasantries it provides. A theology of glory works well when things are going well. A theology of glory can be a marvelous way to assure the self-assured and to confirm a life of ease. It skips the

artwork by Dan Addington

cross–and the deep, difficult, and mysterious questions raised by the cross–and goes right to the resurrection, assuming all is well. But a theology of glory can have a sordid side, too. It can motivate people to respond to evil in kind. It can lead to quick impulse responses; an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. Under the theology of glory, suffering (particularly, my suffering) seems out of place. Therefore, my suffering must be overcome at all costs. It is better that you, or they, suffer instead. The theology of glory stands behind the very theology of kingdom (read: Empire) that Jesus came to disrupt and transform.

The theology of the cross understands that suffering is a part of life. It does not rush past the cross to get to the resurrection. Instead, it recognizes that before resurrection comes, we live in Holy Saturday; on this side of the resurrected body, the restored cosmos, and the eternal city. The theology of the cross does not take the absence of suffering as a sign of God’s favor. Instead, it wrestles with the profound unknowing that characterizes so much of this life. It struggles with the apparent absence of God (the hiddenness of God) even, some would add–though I cannot go that far–the death of God.

Today’s theology of the cross has little interest in the metaphysical features of the “onto” God of classical theism, with all the “omnis” (omniscience, omnipresence, omnipotence) and all the “ims” (immutable, impassible, etc.). The God of the theology of the cross is a God who enters fully into the suffering of the world, who is defined not so much by the “omnis” and “ims” as by the “ins” and the “withs.” That is, a God who with is through our pain, who suffers with us as on the cross and who is in our suffering and in the brokenness of the world, even now.

The theology of the cross is not given to countering might with mightier, or strength with stronger, or violence with more violence. The theology of the cross underlies a response of lament and brokenness, solidarity and patient struggle.

As we struggle to comprehend the atrocities done by ISIS, with their deeply misguided (yes, and evil, no doubt) apocalyptic and horrifically violent eschatology being played out in real time, as they attempt to usher in the end of the world and the establishment of their reign through the spilling of blood (a theology of glory, if ever there was one), perhaps Christians should deeply consider what insights the theology of the cross has for us today. This is not to say that the use of violence to counter or perhaps even eradicate ISIS will not be necessary to protect the lives of so many innocents and to end the terror. But the use of violence will not–it cannot–be driven by a theology of the cross. And as I hear some of the reactions on social media and elsewhere (and as I reflect on my own instinctual reactions), we would be wise to recall the witness of the theology of the cross. This may be the best way to not play into the hands of evil, who want–even who *need–*an adversary to continue to fuel their own endeavors of violence and to heighten their apocalyptic urgency. Can the church, by drawing on this deep well, offer up an alternative way of reacting to this horror? Might it, paradoxically enough, be a better way to undo its power (as incredible as it may seem)?

Because the temptation is to return to our usual responses to violence and terror (responding in kind), we need a theology of the cross now more than ever.

Uncategorized

ISIS

Martin Luther

theology of the cross

Previous Post

February 13, 2015

Coakley's 'Prayer Based' and 'Incorporative' Model of the Trinity

Next Post

February 18, 2015 My Mom Will Get Her Brain Back: A Reflection on Ash Wednesday

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2020 November 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 December 2018 July 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz