Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Unfundamentalist Christians

What’s So Confusing About Grace?

Last updated on: September 6, 2017 at 6:50 am   by Dan Wilkinson

What’s So Confusing About Grace? 2017-09-06T06:50:07-06:00 Dan Wilkinson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

whats-so-confusing-about-grace

The answer to the question posed by the title of Randal Rauser’s new book, What’s So Confusing About Grace? is “just about everything,” especially if you grew up, as Rauser did, in the North American evangelical subculture of the 80s and 90s.

Rauser’s spiritual memoir recounts his lifelong struggle to understand both the foundational and the superficial issues of Christian faith (the two are easily confused, as is made amply evident throughout the book).

Beginning with his conversion to Christianity at the age of five, Rauser takes us through seasons of certainty and doubt as he examines issues like salvation, hell, grace, good works, the Bible, the Church, and Christian doctrine. He “tells that story of moving from the naive innocence of a child’s faith, on through layers of doctrinal and ethical complexity, wrestling with the fear of ultimate failure, and finally arriving at an abiding trust in the God who is infinitely greater, wiser, more merciful, and more loving than I could ever be” (xii).

Equal parts humorous, sobering, and thought-provoking, Rauser explores the big issues of Christianity by honestly recounting the often self-deprecating anecdotes of his youth. He discusses hell through the story of an ill-fated gingerbread cookie, and exposes the hypocrisy of the notion that loving Jesus requires eschewing anything “secular,” which led him to smash his Peter Gabriel cassette tapes on the pavement. But he also offers more serious fare by tackling questions like: why does God allow so much pain and suffering? Can a serial killer be a Christian? How should we understand the violent texts of the Bible?

Though Rauser often leaves the most difficult questions unanswered (that’s why they’re so difficult, after all), he also provides wisdom about how to negotiate the pitfalls of conservative evangelicalism. After highlighting the problematic nature of a literal reading of the Bible, Rauser offers this interpretive principle:

“Gradually I moved away from the Literal Principle. But what interpretive approach is there to replace it? This is a question as complicated as the biblical library itself. And a satisfactory answer must address the nuances of distinct literary genres, the historical contexts in which various text were written, and the theological themes guiding each text…. But I do have a principle which I think can at least replace the Literal Principle as a general orientation to reading the entire library of Scripture. I call it the Jesus Principle and it goes like this: read the Bible in light of the life and teachings of Jesus. To put it another way, read the Bible with your Jesus glasses on. Finally here is my favorite version of the principle: read the Bible in a way that makes you more like Jesus.” (131)

And, just as reading the Bible through the lens of Jesus offers a workable biblical hermeneutic, Rauser gradually comes to realize that understanding Christianity through God’s unending, unbounded love is the only resolution to his quest to cram all of Christianity into a nutshell:

“Indeed, I kept at it for years with an endlessly evolving account of salvation: befriending Jesus; praying a sinner’s prayer; accepting and observing four (or five or six) spiritual laws; avoiding mortal sins and fatally errant beliefs. The list goes on and on. Ironically, the more I tried to simplify the Gospel, packing it into its own little nut, the more complex and unwieldy it became.” (292)

It won’t be spoiling the book to reveal Rauser’s conclusion about what lies at the heart of the gospel:

“Jesus loves me. And you. And by the way, he also loves our enemies. The truth is that he loves all of us, the good, the bad, and the ugly. And that’s not all. He loves every single square inch of the creation too. And he calls us to discover that love, to live in it, and to live it out to a broken and hurting world for the glory of God the Father.” (293)

Rauser readily admits when he doesn’t have the answers, and good-naturedly pokes at his younger self when he thought he did. This account of his spiritual growth over the last forty years is a wonderful demonstration of how doubt need not destroy faith, but can instead cause it to blossom.

Find out more about What’s So Confusing About Grace? here, or purchase it on Amazon here.

 


Dan WilkinsonDan Wilkinson
Dan is the Executive Editor of the Unfundamentalist Christians blog. He is a writer, graphic designer and IT specialist. He lives in Montana, is married and cares for two cats.

Book Reviews

grace

love

memoir

Previous Post



September 1, 2017

Conservatives Double-Down on Archaic Views on Sexuality, Bigots Sing Their Praise

Next Post



September 8, 2017 More Than a Follower


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Christian History Christian Issues Christian Spirituality Current Events Fundamentalism Islam John Shore LGBT Movie Reviews Poetry Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Here I am, send me!"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaiah Peter Moses Elijah

Related posts from Unfundamentalist Christians

Progressive Christian

Discovering "Biblical Truths"

Unfundamentalist Christians

Progressive Christian

Bible Nation: The United States of Hobby Lobby

Unfundamentalist Christians

Progressive Christian

Dear Resistance

Unfundamentalist Christians

Progressive Christian

Faith in the Fog: Love as Our Compass

Unfundamentalist Christians

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube