Kicking the Samaritan: Christianity and the Anti-Muslim Backlash

Last updated on: November 19, 2015 at 6:37 am by Don M Burrows

Kicking the Samaritan: Christianity and the Anti-Muslim Backlash 2015-11-19T06:37:38-06:00 Don M Burrows

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

View image | gettyimages.com

By now, the anti-Muslim backlash we witness after every fresh terror attack is not all that surprising. Bigots will be bigots, and they are not known for complexity or nuance in the face of … well, anything.

What makes it more unsettling this time is that while in decades past the top Republican in the country has denounced Islamophobia, this time around Republican candidates for the presidency have fallen over themselves to be ever more hateful toward Muslims.

A full 23 governors (most of them Republicans) announced on Monday that they would not welcome Syrian refugees into their borders, while Jeb Bush noticeably departed from his brother’s more measured words and declared that we should screen people by religion – accepting only Christian refugees and not Muslim ones into America.

As if that weren’t bad enough, the Republican front-runner, Donald Trump, then mused on national television that we should look at shutting down mosques.

All of this from the party of “religious freedom.”

We could wax on about how hypocritical they are for thinking religious freedom means actively discriminating against gays or denying your employees birth control, as opposed to, you know, shutting down houses of worship. But their mentality seems far darker than mere hypocrisy.

Need it even be said in this day and age? To turn one’s back on refugees is the epitome of anti-Christian action.

When Jesus was asked what one must do to attain eternal life in the Gospel of Luke, he affirmed the answer that includes to “love your neighbor as yourself.” When asked who is one’s neighbor, he recounted the famous parable of the Good Samaritan.

The Good Samaritan story is so famous that the weight of its original telling is often overlooked. We talk about someone who stops to help a stranded motorist fix a flat as a “good Samaritan.” Or we say someone is a “Samaritan driver” if they’re particularly passive (i.e., a decent person) and allow people to pull out in front of them in busy traffic.

But forgotten is the fact that this parable was so poignant specifically because it suggested that a Samaritan could be “good” at all. Samaritans were outsiders whose religion and ethnicity were anathema to Jesus’s audience. Not only does Jesus paint the Samaritan as a “true neighbor” in conjunction with the question of who can attain eternal life, he also adds to the punch of such a notion by painting two presumably “good” people – a Levite and a priest – as not so good after all, for they felt no charity for the bruised and beaten bystander and took no pity upon him.

There is also a political element to the story: the man who is beaten and robbed is attacked by lestai. As I’ve written about before, this was a common term for a robber, but it also was used to refer to a violent revolutionary – it had many of the extreme political overtones that we might equate with “terrorist” today. So there’s a very real possibility that the violence in the Good Samaritan story could have been politically motivated, though the story doesn’t depend on that interpretation.

Regardless, even if you aren’t swayed by basic Christian (or just human) charity, then at least look at the math: there are 1.2 billion Muslims worldwide. Among the tiny fraction who carried out the nightmarish assault on Paris, only one of them has even (possibly) been connected with the recent wave of refugees.

Like the man attacked in the Good Samaritan story, these refugees are the frontline victims of fanatical terrorism. As many before me have pointed out, they are fleeing precisely because their homeland has been devastated by war. When refugees fled Europe in World War II, we romanticized their escape into Casablanca, one of the most renowned films of all time. But then, they were mostly white and Christian.

One can speculate about “what Jesus would do” with respect to contraceptives, gays, abortion, or sex education, but when it comes to relating to our Muslim neighbors — wherever they may be in the world — one need only read the Gospels and start acting like Jesus explicitly commanded us to.

About Don M. Burrows
Don M. Burrows is a former journalist and current college preparatory school teacher. Don holds a Ph.D. in Classical Studies with a Ph.D. minor in New Testament. A former Christian fundamentalist, Don is now a member of the United Church of Christ and can be found routinely advocating that the Bible cannot be read or explored without appreciating its ancient, historical context. Don lives in Minneapolis with his wife and two young children. Don blogs at Nota Bene and can also be found on Facebook.

Previous Post

November 16, 2015

How the Traditional Doctrine of Hell Undermines Christian Character

Next Post

November 19, 2015 Must Christians Believe in a Second Coming?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Christian History Christian Issues Christian Spirituality Current Events Fundamentalism Islam John Shore LGBT Movie Reviews Poetry Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz