The Paradox of Fundamentalism

Last updated on: June 28, 2016 at 7:24 pm by Dan Wilkinson

The Paradox of Fundamentalism 2016-06-28T19:24:41-06:00 Dan Wilkinson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

error

Earlier this week on the Unfundamentalist Christians Facebook Page we linked to John Shore’s post “Is hell real?” What are we, six-year-olds?

In response, several of our readers offered their thoughts on the fundamentalist understanding of hell and salvation:

Ryan J.: They say if I don’t believe in it [hell] or don’t believe it’s eternal, that apparently I’m going to go there.

Stacey N.: That is something I honestly don’t get. It’s like, you can tell someone what you believe — that you’ve done the Sinner’s Prayer thing, you’ve been down the Roman Road, but somehow, if you’ve poured over scripture and don’t think your friends who haven’t are going to BURN FOREVER — I guess that means you’ve “lost your salvation” or never had it and jumping through the right hoops means nothing?

And then our Social Media Manager, Christy Caine, added her own brilliant breakdown of the fundamentalist mindset:

It doesn’t make sense, this paradox that you point out. But they refuse to acknowledge the paradox and as other intelligent people have made the point: you cannot remove by logic ideas that were not placed there by it.

Fundamentalists and many (most?) conservative religious people hold a binary worldview: black and white thinking, this or that (but never both), all or nothing, there is no gray.

So, even though they can say with confidence “in order to become a Christian you need to do X, and you’ve done X,” another part of their belief is that Christians have to believe the Bible is the inerrant word of God and if you reject any part of (their interpretation of) scripture, then you reject the whole thing.

When you point out this contradiction to them, in their binary worldview, the cognitive dissonance does not compute. They get flustered and end the conversation, because clearly you are trying to trick them and only people influenced by the devil would try to confuse them like that.

These folks cognitively can’t handle paradox, they go straight to “File not found.”

And rather than do the difficult mental work of trying to sort through things that don’t make sense, they insulate themselves from the discomfort of challenging their deeply held notions which are so intimately tied to their sense of self and who they are — they avoid thinking about it at all.

It is an ego/psyche self-protective mechanism, and I’ve seen them do it over and over and over again. It is the beauty of psychology that it works, and one can see the evidence of it all around. The concrete thinking and the binary worldview are integral parts of the conservative/fundamentalist mindset, and without effort on the individual’s part to challenge those ways of thinking that thinking will never change.

These same folks also often shun higher education and choose to surround themselves with like-minded individuals, cutting off those with whom they disagree. This worldview is taught, learned and handed down generation after generation, and, for them, it represents the only possible reality. There is no other way of seeing the world because “How could there be?”

For those who have been able to exit this cycle, we see clearly how this tribalist worldview threatens the very fabric of the country.

Christy’s analysis brings to mind the words of M. Scott Peck, who offers a way out of that cycle in The Road Less Traveled:

To develop a broader vision we must be willing to forsake, to kill, our narrower vision. In the short run it is more comfortable not to do this — to stay where we are, to keep using the same microcosmic map, to avoid suffering the death of cherished notions. The road of spiritual growth, however, lies in the opposite direction. We begin by distrusting what we already believe, by actively seeking the threatening and unfamiliar, by deliberately challenging the validity of what we have previously been taught and hold dear. The path to holiness lies through questioning everything.

Sadly, the hallmark of fundamentalism is to question virtually nothing about that viewpoint, including the notion of hell as a place of eternal conscious torment for anyone who fails to embrace their narrowly defined ideology.

Dan Wilkinson

Dan is the Executive Editor of the Unfundamentalist Christians blog. He is a writer, graphic designer and IT specialist. He lives in Montana, is married and has at least two cats.

Fundamentalism

fundamentalism

hell

Previous Post

August 31, 2015

Clobbering the Confusion About 1 Corinthians 6:9-10

Next Post

September 3, 2015 Why I Support Kim Davis

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Christian History Christian Issues Christian Spirituality Current Events Fundamentalism Islam John Shore LGBT Movie Reviews Poetry Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz