Can gentleness save evangelical apologetics?

Last updated on: February 16, 2015 at 8:51 am by Dan Wilkinson

Can gentleness save evangelical apologetics? 2015-02-16T08:51:59-06:00 Dan Wilkinson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

willard1 “Apologetics itself has become a problem. It has become a problem in both its content and its spirit.” So says the late Dallas Willard in a new book about apologetics, The Allure of Gentleness: Defending the Faith in the Manner of Jesus, (HarperOne, $26.99).

In a series of talks that were compiled and edited by Willard’s daughter Rebecca Willard Heatley, Willard argues for an approach to Christian apologetics that isn’t solely based on argument, evidence and reason, but also is characterized by gentleness.

He seeks to temper the often combative and acerbic nature of apologetic discourse with a humble, generous, open and loving approach, wisely realizing that apologetic arguments “will all be wasted unless the allure of gentleness pervades all that we do.”

Willard covers much of the usual apologetic ground, discussing knowledge, truth, reason, faith, doubt, God’s existence, divine hiddenness, hell, cosmology and the problems of pain and evil. But, though framed by a good intent, Willard’s arguments are often cut from the same well-worn cloth of most modern evangelical apologetics.

Despite setting out to correct Christian apologetic’s problems of content and spirit, Willard’s approach often perpetuates them. For example, while discussing Christian ethics, Willard says that

Richard Robinson was one of the leading atheist philosophers during the latter part of the twentieth century. He died in 1996, and he knows better now … [emphasis added]

The idea that Robinson “knows better now” was probably intended as merely a humorous interjection, but it’s precisely that sort of thoughtless smugness which pervades so much of Christian apologetics. Willard speaks of having confidence in the Christian faith, but an off-handed diminishment of a deceased interlocutor goes beyond confidence into the realm of arrogance. Alluring gentleness this is not.

Later in the book, Willard argues for the reliably of the Bible, saying that “as God gave the scriptures, in their original form, they were absolutely perfect.” He acknowledges the circular nature of arguing for biblical reliability based on what it says about itself, instead saying that “the Bible, taken merely by the recognized standards of historiography, is demonstrably a reliable historical record,” so that Christians can say that “we know the Bible is true, because the standard canon of historiography authenticated it.”

Such an argument is either naïve or disingenuous. All but the most ardent fundamentalists will readily admit that there are numerous historical challenges to the biblical account. At best, we can’t verify the historical authenticity of many biblical accounts and at worst, the biblical accounts sometimes get the history completely wrong. But regardless of how one understands the historicity of scripture, it is demonstrably false that “the standard canon of historiography [has] authenticated it.”

If Willard is unable to approach the Bible honestly, if he’s unwilling to acknowledge the real difficulties and doubts that confront the Christian faith, then I question the significance of his entire apologetic undertaking. Gentleness in apologetics is a noble goal, ignorance and obfuscation are not.

I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with apologetics. It’s good to seek to understand the reasons for our faith and to be able to explain them to others. Sadly however, apologetics, as practiced by many Christians, including Dallas Willard, continues to be an exercise in easy answers and self-reinforcing arguments.

I wholeheartedly agree with Willard that “apologetics itself has become a problem … in both its content and its spirit.” Unfortunately, those problems persist.

Dan Wilkinson

Dan is a writer, graphic designer and IT specialist. He lives in Montana, is married and has two cats. He blogs at CoolingTwilight.com.

Book Reviews

apologetics

dallas willard

Previous Post

February 11, 2015

Denied a birth certificate and SSN# by her fundamentalist parents

Next Post

March 2, 2015 How (and why) Adam and Eve evolved

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Christian History Christian Issues Christian Spirituality Current Events Fundamentalism Islam John Shore LGBT Movie Reviews Poetry Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz