What the hell is Southern Baptist leader Al Mohler fired up about now?

Last updated on: November 1, 2014 at 11:33 am by Don M Burrows

What the hell is Southern Baptist leader Al Mohler fired up about now? 2014-11-01T11:33:05-06:00 Don M Burrows

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

mohler

My friend John Shore sure stirred a hornets’ nest when he dared to imagine a Christianity without hell in in his recent post What Christianity without hell looks like.

Actually, to be more accurate, he stirred a nest of Southern Baptists, specifically the one feathered by Al Mohler, the denomination’s go-to pseudo-intellectual on, well, everything.

I’ve written before about Mohler’s penchant for having no clue what he’s talking about. Many times.[1] Anyone possessing a dollop of critical thought is capable of spotting the glaring problems in his arguments.

Mohler’s shtick is really just a variation of the Southern Baptists’ favorite creedal theme: If you doubt or question any part of what we teach, you might as well flush all of Christianity down the basement drain in the fellowship hall.

Mohler’s biggest fret, of course, is over “Biblical authority,” which is a doctrine, and not, in fact, a reasonable conclusion arrived at by those who have studied the Bible academically. For Mohler, “Biblical authority” consists of “being faithful to the inerrancy and infallibility of Scripture,” which is, again, a doctrine — a doctrine that Southern Baptists and other conservative evangelicals care very much about, but not one believed by the vast majority of Christians worldwide.

Mohler takes Mr. Shore to task for his “hermeneutic,” and explains for his readers that “hermeneutics” are “the science or the discipline of interpreting the Scripture.” Related to the name of the Greek god of communication, Hermes, hermeneutics is a fancy word for interpretation. But it’s hardly in and of itself a “science” or “discipline.” It’s just a word to describe a specific model of reading—which can be literally anything. A homophobe spitting rage as he reads a gay-themed Archie comic book is practicing the “science” of hermeneutics.

We do have a real and legitimate science and discipline for studying the Bible, complete with its own scholarly auspices, which include regional and national meetings, peer-reviewed journals, academically refereed monographs and the like: this is the discipline of Biblical Studies. But, of course, Mohler’s take on “Biblical infallibility” is far outside the scope of even many conservative Biblical scholars.

Incapable of addressing before his flock the glaring disconnect between pretending to knowledge of the Bible and actually possessing knowledge of the Bible, Mohler jumps aboard the infallibility tube-sled for a quick trip down his very own (and very icy) slippery slope: he accuses Mr. Shore of “hermeneutic nihilism,” and of making the Bible “whatever you say it is,” the (absurd) idea being that without looking through the lens of the Southern Baptist doctrine of infallibility, it’s impossible to understand the actual text of the Bible.

So here we have the intellectual mouthpiece of a denomination whose approach to Scripture falls far outside consensus scholarship on the Bible asserting that Mr. Shore is guilty of abandoning critical criteria for studying the Bible—when, in fact, it is the institutions of Mohler’s own denomination that willfully and categorically reject any and all criteria of Biblical criticism accepted in scholarly institutions and academies around the world.

This is not just dripping with irony. It’s gushing with it.

Like Mr. Shore, I, too, would like to see a Christianity without hell. I’d also very much like to see a Christianity without Al Mohler.

^ Other posts about Mohler on the UC blog include Al Mohler Fit the Battle of Jericho and Inerrancy Came Tumblin’ Down, Dr. Albert Mohler versus musician Michael Gungor: Who is on the verge of theological peril? and What would Jesus make of Southern Baptist leader Al Mohler’s argument for the death penalty? For more about the development of the whole theory of hell, see our Black Saturday, Hades, and the Beginning of Hell.

About Don M. Burrows
Don M. Burrows is a former journalist and current college preparatory school teacher. Don holds a Ph.D. in Classical Studies from the University of Minnesota. A former Christian fundamentalist, Don is now a member of the United Church of Christ and contends most firmly that the Bible cannot be read or explored without appreciating its ancient, historical context. Don lives in Minneapolis with his wife and two young children. Don blogs at Nota Bene and can also be found on Facebook.

Previous Post

October 29, 2014

Atheist and Christian argue about hell. Guess who wins?

Next Post

November 4, 2014 Mary Curran Hackett's novel provides "Proof of Angels"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Christian History Christian Issues Christian Spirituality Current Events Fundamentalism Islam John Shore LGBT Movie Reviews Poetry Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz