Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Unequally Yoked

Receiving Fraternal Correction from Non-Catholics [Saints Bookclub]

Last updated on: June 15, 2015 at 3:50 pm   by Leah Libresco

Receiving Fraternal Correction from Non-Catholics [Saints Bookclub] 2015-06-15T15:50:14-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In 2015, I’m reading and blogging through Ronald Knox’s collection of sermons on Christian exemplars, Captive Flames: On Selected Saints and Christian Heroes.  Every Monday (kinda), I’ll be writing about the next portrait in the book, so you’re welcome to peruse them all and/or read along.

(Nic McPhee / Flickr)

(Nic McPhee / Flickr)

In this week’s chapter of Captive Flames, Roland Knox discusses the stories of King David and St Edmund of Abingdon in parallel, as a lens on how Catholics should live as exiles in the world and how they should root themselves.  It’s certainly a topic I’m interested in!  But I disagreed strongly with Knox’s characterization of the spirit in which this Benedict Option-like life should be lived.  Knox wrote:

It is possible nowadays, thank God, for laymen to take a direct and public part in spreading the faith.  But, even apart from that, we Catholics do not live as our grandfathers used to live, in a sort of water-tight compartment, separated from the world around us.  We mix freely with Protestant neighbours, and either we shall influence them or they us.  If we are not strongly fortified in the practice of religion, their unbelief will tell upon our faith, their low standard of morality will infect and degrade our consciences.

Maybe this is part of the problem of generalizing from saints to regular folks.  It’s ridiculous for me to assume that other people will degrade my conscience rather than me degrading theirs, simply because I’m a member of the church I think it most likely to be true.  That’s a claim about the superiority of the Church, not about me.

I frequently receive productive correction or moral examples from non-Catholics simply because you don’t have to be right about everything to notice when someone else is being wrong about some particular thing.  Our blind spots with regard to our own behavior are large enough that pretty much everyone who reads through the Evil Overlord List and reads this piece of advice (“One of my advisors will be an average five-year-old child. Any flaws in my plan that he is able to spot will be corrected before implementation.”) winds up chuckling ruefully, thinking of past errors.

There’s reason to welcome the moral claims other make about me — I don’t accept them uncritically, but I try to at least get curious.  I find it often helps to treat moral correction and questions the way Orson Scott Card suggests a writer should handle beta reader feedback in his How to Write Science Fiction and Fantasy.  I don’t have the quote at hand, but he says that readers are pretty much always right when they say part of a story doesn’t work for them, and rarely right when they tell the author how to fix it.  (I think I’ve seen other authors give this advice, too).

Everyone has a conscience, naturally (though imperfectly) directing our attention to the good, so when my actions make someone else pause, confused or hurt, that’s pretty valuable data.  Sometimes I’m still right, and this is a moral error that the other person is making, sometimes we have different beliefs about the physical world but we’d agree ethically if we resolved them and we should both try to figure out what’s going on, sometimes I’m doing the right thing, but I’m not conveying some important piece of context and, absent that, other people are right to oppose me, and sometimes I’m just plain wrong!

In last week’s chapter, Knox implied that just-plain-heretics can still be good beta readers of a Catholic’s choices, since sometimes sects try to strike out on their own because they think the Catholic church isn’t living up to Catholic ideals.  That’s the right-about-the-problem, wrong-about-the-solution kind of help that beta readers tend to provide.

So, ultimately, I found Knox’s chapter frustrating this week because I think there’s plenty of room to warn Catholics not to “lose their saltiness” without implying that the people they move among are necessarily corrupting.  I’d expect folks who took this passage too much to heart to be too defensive against external threats and not-vigilant-enough against internal ones (at the scale of an individual church or conscience).

Spiritual Practice

Knox bookclub

Previous Post



June 13, 2015

Talking to Theologues + A Book Giveaway

Next Post



June 16, 2015 What To Do When You're Struggling With Catholicism


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Proverbs say about a soft answer?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It brings wealth It is useless It starts a fight It turns away wrath

Related posts from Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Starving Laypeople of Devotion in Church

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

Aunt Alberta And Being Right (but the boring...

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

The Virtues of Sad Songs (a piece for...

Unequally Yoked

Catholic

The (Extra) Mercy of My Conversion

Unequally Yoked

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube