Breaking Strains for Robots and Women

Last updated on: June 11, 2015 at 4:37 pm by Leah Libresco

Breaking Strains for Robots and Women 2015-06-11T16:37:35-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The ever-excellent cultural critic Alyssa Rosenberg has written a great essay today titled “Want to understand what it means to be a woman? Look to robots.” The gist:

I haven’t seen anyone acknowledge the obvious point that so much of pop culture is making, and has been making for more than half a decade: Robots are an excellent metaphor for contemporary womanhood. Women are expected to declare ourselves flawless, but no matter how much we claim our perfection, we’re still forced to offer evidence for our own humanity.

She works through a couple examples, from music videos, to tv, and film about the kinds of strength that women (and robots) are allowed and when those strengths are treated as suspect, and I had two music videos to add as an addendum to that list.

First up, Christina Perri’s “Human”

It’s gorgeously shot (and the behind the scenes video, where Perri talks about covering her tattoos for taping, and seeing her body as it hasn’t been for years, is pretty interesting). And here’s how the lyrics go:

I can turn it on
Be a good machine
I can hold the weight of worlds
If that’s what you need
Be your everything

I can do it
I can do it
I’ll get through it

But I’m only human
And I bleed when I fall down
I’m only human
And I crash and I break down
Your words in my head, knives in my heart
You build me up and then I fall apart
‘Cause I’m only human

The singer is as strong as she needs to be to handle the demands and requirements of others, but the one bonus feature is that she’s not strong enough for herself. All the forms of vulnerability described in the last stanza quoted above build up to describing the power that someone else has over her. Her strength can’t really be threatening, since it’s ultimately under the thumb of the person who “build[s] me up and then I fall apart.”

And the weird thing about the song is that that particular form of weakness sounds like a selling point and a promise. Even though there’s a mutual dependency alluded to in her character’s ability to “hold the weight of worlds” what she describes for herself is breaking/bleeding/crashing and what she promises is convenience and companionship. Her strength is meant to be so naturally lent and accepted that it would never look like weakness to need it.

The other vid I like on this topic isn’t as obviously robot-related, but, in “Why Don’t You Love Me?” Beyonce’s costumes and dancing are so aggressively stylized that the come off as on the fembot construction, and, as Silvana points out on Tiger Beatdown, the lyrics put an emphasis on construction and performance, even if all the circuits involved are wetware. Quoth Silvana:

The video, however, is a lot more interesting since, with Beyoncé playing the role of “B.B. Homemaker,” it is openly mocking a lot of the ideals and tenets of womanhood.” I’d go much further than that. I’d say that the song and the video together form a radical critique of femininity, full stop. Because this is what femininity is about: making yourself appealing to men by adhering as closely possible to cultural ideals of perfect womanhood. Her lyric is not “when I am so damn easy to love,” but “when I make me so damn easy to love.” It’s effort, it’s a construct, it is something she does and not something that she is. It is performative.

…

Which is basically what it’s like to be a modern woman. We perform femininity, and not only does it not succeeding in bringing about the desired result, I think it’s actually counter-productive to our real goals. Particularly when we’re talking about relationships

Asking for the wrong kinds of strength, being reassured by strange sorts of weaknesses is, as Silvana points out, the kind of thing that damages a relationship as well as the person facing the odd or contradictory requests. It can be hard for guys to figure out what to desire, if they’re working from (pardon the computer metaphor) a training set of bad examples. It’s a good idea to highlight positive ones and the kinds of heightened bad ones that make the wrongness of our defaults more apparent.

Uncategorized

sex and sexuality

Previous Post

June 10, 2015

A Dominican Invitation to Witness [Saints Bookclub]

Next Post

June 12, 2015 7QT: How Composing, Covers, and Costumes Work

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the meaning of the word "Golgotha"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peaceful Garden City of Bread River of Blood Place of the Skull