Concussion Tests and a Voting Mess [538]

Last updated on: May 31, 2015 at 10:36 am by Leah Libresco

Concussion Tests and a Voting Mess [538] 2015-05-31T10:36:33-04:00 Leah Libresco

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here’s the roundup of what I’ve been working on at FiveThirtyEight over the last week:

The ‘One Person, One Vote’ Case Relies On Statistics That Nobody Has

The plaintiffs are challenging the usual method (counting total number of people living in a district) and are asking that states use the total number of eligible voters instead. The trouble is, we don’t have robust statistics on the number of eligible voters. If the Supreme Court were to set new standards for districting, we would need to overhaul the nation’s statistics and surveys.

I was kind of surprised, once I started digging in, that we don’t have these numbers — just a series of fiddly approximations that probably don’t match our standards for election law. Even the more exhaustive attempts to figure out how many eligible voters there are throw up their hands at a certain point:

In a 2001 paper in the American Political Science Review, Michael McDonald and Samuel Popkin suggested two other possible factors to consider when estimating the total number of eligible voters. First, some states have residency requirements that might make people who have recently moved ineligible. Second, citizens can lose their voting rights if they are ruled mentally incompetent. McDonald and Popkin thought both of these factors were more trouble than they were worth to model: The researchers estimated that only 1 percent of the voting-age population failed to meet residency requirements and that only 0.1 percent were mentally incompetent to vote.

If the Supreme Court requires eligible voter estimates for districting, they may need to rule on whether McDonald and Popkin were right to exclude those groups — and on a host of other methodological questions — as the states scramble to commission constitutionally compatible surveys.

You can read the whole thing at FiveThirtyEight, and, if you like, you can head there by way of SCOTUSblog, which linked to my piece!

Then I wound up covering sports, through the lens of epidemiology:

We Don’t Know How Well The NBA’s Concussion Tests Work

So, if the tests are pretty accurate, why wasn’t Thompson identified as possibly concussed until after the game?

It’s hard to say, especially without information on the NBA-specific protocols, but sometimes tests are less accurate in real life than they are in a trial. Or a concussed player could just be unlucky; 5 percent or so pass a screening test in error.

If Thompson hadn’t mentioned that he felt ill, questions might not have been raised about whether the test failed. Players are a check on the test, but they may not feel free to speak up if they’re passed in error.

Continue reading at FiveThirtyEight…

And here’s a little bonus paragraph that didn’t really belong in the article (since the NBA does use baseline tests in their concussion protocols), but I was just interested personally in how well the tests did when you didn’t have a pre-concussion result to compare to:

Both the SCAT and the CCAT are best when administered as a before-and-after test, letting doctors compare the player’s post-injury score to a baseline from the beginning of the season. If a baseline isn’t available, both tests are a lot weaker. The SCAT sensitivity drops to 83% and the CCAT to 69%, making both much more likely to miss concussions.

And, if you’re wondering where you get concussable people to run tests on (the answer is not that the scientists thwak them on the head)… most of the studies I read for this piece were done on rugby players. Now there’s a grim warning about a sport — “Number one choice of scientists who need concussion victims!”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 26, 2015

Letting Prayer Lead from Self to Other

Next Post

June 3, 2015 Good Fights, Like Good Friendships, Are A Long-Term Promise

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 7 Quick Takes Apologetics Atheism Book Conversion Debate Tactics Debates Epistemology/Philosophy Housekeeping Ideological Turing Test Marriage Morality in Practice Parsing Catholicism Possibly Heretical Radio Reviews/Recommendations Sequence Index Spiritual Practice Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What disaster did Joseph predict would happen to Egypt?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Great fire Flood Plague of locusts Seven-year famine